Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Android SDK vs Bitbar comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Android SDK
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.9
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbar
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
11th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (27th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Mobile App Platforms category, the mindshare of Android SDK is 22.9%, down from 26.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbar is 3.2%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile App Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Zain Omer - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable and scalable product that offers ease of coding and designing to build applications
There isn't a need for any improvement in Android SDK since they provide users with two or three updates in a year, making it quite stable. The security part in Android SDK depends on how you build an application using the tool so you can apply some security to your application. The reason why Temenos Quantum is the best security tool is because it uses a middleware named Fabric, so the APIs are connected from Fabric to Temenos Quantum. The middleware offered by Temenos is really strong. If I compare the security offered by Android to that of Temenos Quantum, Android will lose in terms of security. You can create a secure application with Android SDK. The amount of security offered by Android SDK is less when compared to Temenos, making it an area of concern where improvement can be made. I don't think Android SDK needs to add any features because they give updates frequently.
reviewer1288116 - PeerSpot reviewer
A testing platform with a good API for apps, but pricing is complicated
I like that the AI Testbot is a near-zero code application for testing. For this use case, the function is good. The services are robust. Game testing and the API for apps are also good. From the perspective of pricing, licensing, ease of use, integration with other applications, impact complexity, and integration with other tools, we're pretty much very satisfied.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Near Field Communication feature is its most valuable feature."
"Android SDK is very scalable, secure, and fast...It is a completely stable solution that has been working for many years."
"I have found the functions related to the services to the community for applications to be the most valuable."
"The best thing about Android SDK is its extensive graphics compared to iOS."
"Supports mobile and IOT devices."
"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a stable product."
"The look, ease of use, sturdiness, and reliability are excellent."
"Android SDK's best feature is its ease of use."
"Ability to use different frameworks."
"Game testing and the API for apps are good."
 

Cons

"Android SDK could use some new features, for example, picture-in-picture."
"Google has a monopoly on tools for Android app development, so Android SDK is the only choice available."
"The security implementation is the only area of concern in Android SDK where a bit of enhancements can help."
"The amount of security offered by Android SDK is less when compared to Temenos, making it an area of concern where improvement can be made."
"It would be nice to get fewer updates."
"There are security issues in the Android platform."
"We encounter compatibility issues between the product and the device from the manufacturer."
"The development environment of Android SDK could improve."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Many countries, even those with fewer resources, prefer using Android SDK because it is cheap."
"I am using the free version of Android SDK."
"It is an open-source platform."
"Android SDK is essentially an open-source product on which anybody can work."
"Android SDK can be cheap and can go high in terms of prices, and it all depends on who the customers are and what kind of application you want. One application may cost 5,000 USD and can go up from 1,00,000 to 2,00,000 USD."
"The pricing is complicated. It's in the middle."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
13%
Real Estate/Law Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Android SDK?
The Near Field Communication feature is its most valuable feature.
What needs improvement with Android SDK?
We encounter compatibility issues between the product and the device from the manufacturer. There are some limitations on Google Play Store availability as well. These particular areas need improve...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Testdroid
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Rovio, Paf, Supercell, NITRO Games, Seriously, AVG, Google, Bosch, Yahoo, Microsoft, Yandex, Mozilla, eBay, PayPal, TESCO, Cisco WebEx, Facebook, LinkedIn, skype, Subway
Find out what your peers are saying about Android SDK vs. Bitbar and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.