We performed a comparison between Amazon Virtual Private Cloud and AWS Batch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Compute Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product’s firewall is very good."
"The solution is secure."
"The product can be used to isolate environments."
"Amazon Virtual Private Cloud isolates networks and offers robust network security. It also adds two network security layers."
"It is very simple to define a network, connect subnets, and set up routing"
"You can get a direct link to AWS to your data even if you are a large organization with a huge data center."
"We can set up our own data center."
"It is a good solution."
"We can easily integrate AWS container images into the product."
"There is one other feature in confirmation or call confirmation where you can have templates of what you want to do and just modify those to customize it to your needs. And these templates basically make it a lot easier for you to get started."
"AWS Batch's deployment was easy."
"AWS Batch manages the execution of computing workload, including job scheduling, provisioning, and scaling."
"Billing and technical support should be better. There is a steep learning curve as well."
"It is a bit difficult to find things because you don't have a single pane of glass or dashboard for every resource."
"There could be better documentation for specific services."
"The performance insights and VPC flow logs should be in the form of GUI or dashboards. The solution needs to work on integration with the transit gateway and multiple accounts."
"They could improve the platform's ability to establish VPN connections to interact with resources outside the network."
"The solution could improve its price."
"This solution is not fully compatible with every vendor that we use regarding firewalls and networking equipment. They provide you with the option and details on how to configure this on your premises but it would be good to have an easier way to do this."
"The tool is not scalable."
"The solution should include better and seamless integration with other AWS services, like Amazon S3 data storage and EC2 compute resources."
"The main drawback to using AWS Batch would be the cost. It will be more expensive in some cases than using an HPC. It's more amenable to cases where you have spot requirements."
"When we run a lot of batch jobs, the UI must show the history."
"AWS Batch needs to improve its documentation."
Amazon Virtual Private Cloud is ranked 7th in Compute Service with 31 reviews while AWS Batch is ranked 3rd in Compute Service with 4 reviews. Amazon Virtual Private Cloud is rated 9.0, while AWS Batch is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Amazon Virtual Private Cloud writes "Easy-to-use product with good access control features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS Batch writes "User-friendly, good customization and offers exceptional scalability, allowing users to run jobs ranging from 32 cores to over 2,000 cores". Amazon Virtual Private Cloud is most compared with , whereas AWS Batch is most compared with AWS Lambda, Apache Spark, AWS Fargate, Oracle Compute Cloud Service and Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling. See our AWS Batch vs. Amazon Virtual Private Cloud report.
See our list of best Compute Service vendors.
We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
