Amazon Timestream vs Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
1,323 views|1,226 comparisons
Microsoft Logo
5,755 views|2,528 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon Timestream and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google and others in Managed NoSQL Databases.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Cosmos should be cheaper. We actually intend to stop using it in the near future because the price is too high."
  • "There is a licensing fee."
  • "For the cloud, we don't pay for the license, but for the on-prem versions, we do pay."
  • "Cosmos DB is a PaaS, so there are no upfront costs for infrastructure. There are only subscriptions you pay for Azure and things like that. But it's a PaaS, so it's a subscription service. The license isn't perpetual, and the cost might seem expensive on its face, but you have to look at the upkeep for infrastructure and what you're saving."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB could be a bit lower."
  • "The cost is the biggest limitation of this solution."
  • "Azure is a pay as you go subscription."
  • "The RU's use case determines our license fees."
  • More Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Since it's a managed service, Azure backend handles scalability. From a user's perspective, we don't need to worry about scalability.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in terms of stability.
    Ranking
    6th
    Views
    1,323
    Comparisons
    1,226
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    1st
    Views
    5,755
    Comparisons
    2,528
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    494
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Microsoft Azure DocumentDB, MS Azure Cosmos DB
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Timestream is a purpose-built time series database service for collecting, storing, and processing time-series data such as server and network logs, sensor data, and industrial telemetry data for IoT and operational applications. Amazon Timestream processes trillions of events per day at one-tenth the cost of relational databases, with up to one thousand times faster query performance than a general-purpose database.

    Amazon Timestream efficiently stores and processes time-series data — data that measures how things change over time — by time intervals. As your data grows over time, Timestream’s adaptive query processing engine understands its location and format, making your data simpler and faster to analyze. Timestream also automates rollups, retention, tiering, and compression of data, so you can manage your data at the lowest possible cost. Timestream is serverless, so there are no servers to manage. It manages time-consuming tasks, such as server provisioning, software patching, setup, configuration, and data retention and tiering, freeing you to focus on building your applications.

    DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development. As a schema-free NoSQL database, DocumentDB provides rich and familiar SQL query capabilities with consistent low latencies on JSON data - ensuring that 99% of your reads are served under 10 milliseconds and 99% of your writes are served under 15 milliseconds. These unique benefits make DocumentDB a great fit for web, mobile, gaming, and IoT, and many other applications that need seamless scale and global replication.

    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    American Cancer Society, Exxon Mobil, Symantec
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Retailer8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise65%

    Amazon Timestream is ranked 6th in Managed NoSQL Databases while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is ranked 1st in Managed NoSQL Databases with 38 reviews. Amazon Timestream is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB writes "Removes bottlenecks related to databases in our application and works quickly because of reference keys". Amazon Timestream is most compared with Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon Neptune, Amazon DocumentDB, Google Cloud Bigtable and Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud, whereas Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is most compared with Amazon Neptune, Amazon DynamoDB, Google Cloud Bigtable, Amazon DocumentDB and Oracle NoSQL Database Cloud.

    See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.