Amazon RDS and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB are both leading platforms in the database services category. Amazon RDS seems to have an advantage in terms of high availability and scalability due to its multi-availability zone feature, while Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB shines with its global distribution and low-latency access, particularly for NoSQL databases.
Features: Amazon RDS offers a fully managed database service for MySQL, Oracle, and SQL Server with automated backups and easy scalability. Its multi-availability zone feature ensures no downtime, providing reliable service. It supports various database engines and automated CI/CD tools, aiding microservices architecture. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is a multi-model NoSQL database with global distribution and low-latency access. It supports multiple APIs and data models, offering high scalability and features like automatic failover and seamless integration with microservices, making it a versatile solution for modern applications.
Room for Improvement: Amazon RDS could improve by enhancing shell access for troubleshooting, adding features for alternative databases like Db2 and NoSQL, and offering more intuitive cost management. Technical support pricing and Microsoft product integration could also improve. Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB faces pricing, indexing, and complex query support challenges. Improvements in cost management, integration capabilities, and optimization techniques are needed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Amazon RDS and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB provide wide deployment flexibility on public cloud platforms. RDS supports on-premises setups, while Cosmos DB is preferred for public cloud deployments. Amazon RDS faces critiques for high technical support costs and variable response quality. In contrast, Microsoft Azure's support is consistent but costly, affecting user satisfaction. Deployment and support experiences differ, reflecting varying user priorities and operational needs.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon RDS uses a pay-as-you-go model with BYOL options, deemed cost-effective due to reduced management overheads and increased agility. Conversely, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB provides a flexible pay-as-you-go model and reserved unit pricing, aligning costs with capacity. Its complex pricing and higher costs for some workloads pose challenges, though reserved unit discounts can mitigate these. Both solutions reveal trade-offs between upfront costs and long-term returns.
Getting an MVP of that project would have taken six to eight months, but because we had an active choice of using Azure Cosmos DB and other related cloud-native services of Azure, we were able to get to an MVP stage in a matter of weeks, which is six weeks.
You can react quickly and trim down the specs, memory, RAM, storage size, etc. It can save about 20% of the costs.
When I have done comparisons or cost calculations, I have sometimes personally seen as much as 25% to 30% savings.
The documentation is quite good.
The official AWS technical support for Amazon RDS is helpful, providing 24/7 assistance for all business support cases with tools such as the health dashboard and AWS trusted advisor.
Premier Support has deteriorated compared to what it used to be, especially for small to medium-sized customers like ours.
The response was quick.
I would rate customer service and support a nine out of ten.
Its automated scaling, both in storage and instances, is vital as it eliminates manual interventions.
Despite being a strong feature, scalability could be improved due to the lack of full functionality in autoscaling.
The system scales up capacity when needed and scales down when not in use, preventing unnecessary expenses.
We like that it can auto-scale to demand, ensuring we only pay for what we use.
We have had no issues with its ability to search through large amounts of data.
Amazon RDS is very stable when deployed correctly across different zones with the right configurations.
It is a stable product overall, with very few issues.
We have multiple availability zones, so nothing goes down.
Azure Cosmos DB would be a good choice if you have to deploy your application in a limited time frame and you want to auto-scale the database across different applications.
I would rate it a ten out of ten in terms of availability and latency.
Simplifying migration for those transitioning from on-premises to cloud environments.
Having native Change Data Capture (CDC) support would be beneficial, allowing for seamless integration with Kafka without relying on external technologies like Debezium.
Enabling performance insights to view query formats where the bottlenecks occur, identifying the fixes, slow queries, and missing indexes.
We must ensure data security remains the top priority.
You have to monitor the Request Units.
The dashboard could include more detailed RU descriptions, IOPS, and compute metrics.
While Azure provides great services, long-term plans on AWS are 20% to 30% cheaper.
I find the pricing of Amazon RDS fair, as AWS operates on a pay-for-what-you-use model.
I rate the price for Amazon as eight on a scale from one to ten.
Initially, it seemed like an expensive way to manage a NoSQL data store, but so many improvements that have been made to the platform have made it cost-effective.
Cosmos DB is expensive, and the RU-based pricing model is confusing.
Cosmos DB is great compared to other databases because we can reduce the cost while doing the same things.
Amazon RDS provides data encryption using services like KMS, crucial for securing high-sensitive data and meeting compliance requirements such as HIPAA or PCI DSS.
Database management is effective in Amazon RDS because it offers automated backups, high availability, read replicas, and support from multiple database engineers, while also providing security, monitoring and metrics, scalability.
Amazon RDS makes it easier for me to manage databases compared to traditional databases like MongoDB or local host servers.
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is its real-time analytics capabilities, which allow for turnaround times in milliseconds.
Performance and security are valuable features, particularly when using Cosmos DB for MongoDB emulation and NoSQL.
The performance and scaling capabilities of Cosmos DB are excellent, allowing it to handle large workloads compared to other services such as Azure AI Search.
Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS) is a web service that makes it easier to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. It provides cost-efficient, resizeable capacity for an industry-standard relational database and manages common database administration tasks.
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is a globally distributed, multi-model database service providing scalability, user-friendliness, and seamless integration, suitable for managing large volumes of structured and unstructured data across diverse applications.
Azure Cosmos DB is renowned for its scalability, stability, and ease of integration, offering robust support for multiple data models and APIs. Its capacity for handling unstructured data efficiently and providing real-time analytics makes it ideal for applications requiring high performance and global distribution. With features like automatic failover and integration with Microsoft products, users benefit from cost optimization and secure data handling. Enhancement opportunities include simplifying queries, improving documentation, and expanding backup and analytics functionalities.
What are the most important features of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?Azure Cosmos DB is frequently used in sectors like web, mobile, IoT, and analytics. It supports applications as a key-value store, processes real-time data, and enables global scalability with low-latency access. Its big data management capabilities and integration with Azure services enhance its utility across industries.
We monitor all Database as a Service (DBaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.