Amazon QLDB vs MongoDB comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and MongoDB are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while MongoDB is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.5% mindshare in ND, compared to MongoDB’s 14.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

Amazon QLDB

Read 1 Amazon QLDB review

157 Views
157 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MongoDB

Read 81 MongoDB reviews

4,438 Views
3,151 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon QLDB

MongoDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon QLDB and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases.

To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,624 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon QLDB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MongoDB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (5th), Managed NoSQL Databases (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Amazon QLDB is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB is 14.7%, down from 25.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Balasubramanyam Kamarapu

Technical Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

A fast and affordable solution that is scalable and has a nice dashboard

The product enables the users to query results faster. It maintains all the versions of the changes done on a specific node. A traditional blockchain would take time, but Amazon QLDB is a bit faster. We have to do many operations in blockchain to read data, but QLDB comes with an easy syntax. The product provides a nice dashboard to view all the information.

Read full review

Uzair Faruqi

Head Of Analytics at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Transforms data flow with adaptable schema and smooth public cloud deployment

One of our business units uses MongoDB, and we developed an ETL pipeline that extracts data from MongoDB and transfers it into our data warehouse MongoDB is a NoSQL database that is similar to a document database. It offers flexibility in schema adaptation, allowing us to change the schema and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product enables the users to query results faster."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Overall, MongoDB has helped manage and analyze attachment data."

"MongoDB has many good replication features and good performance."

"We haven't had any issues with stability."

"It can handle a lot of files quickly."

"The initial setup isn't really that complex."

"I like the document storage feature. It's pretty simple."

"Migrating to MongoDB upgrades the IT environment and puts users in the NoSQL environment, which is faster."

"The installation is very stable."

More MongoDB pros

Cons

"The product should enable users to import data from various databases."

"Enhancing the documentation to make it more beginner-friendly is crucial."

"There should be better integration with other databases."

"I think it would be good to have more search options such as an index resource. This will provide more options and resources to do advance searches."

"You need integration with other tools to run the query in MongoDB."

"Simplifying the aggregation framework would be an improvement."

"There was a need for integrating relational database capabilities, however, MongoDB has introduced a relational converter that allows conversion between SQL and NoSQL."

"Its security features can be better. Sometimes, my higher authority says that we are not going to use MongoDB because it doesn't provide that much security for the RDBMS or relational data that we use for transactions. Instead of MongoDB, we will use Oracle Database because for a transactional service, you have to rely on RDBMS ACID properties. I would love to work on MongoDB by using my mobile phone. When I am working remotely or traveling and have some instances deployed on my server, I should be able to check through my mobile whether all the data is being pulled. GitHub has a similar feature, where it lets you read from the laptop, and you can also pull and push with your mobile phone. I would request MongoDB to provide such a feature. Basically, I want a mobile version for both iOS and Android versions."

"It would be much more useful if I have an admin user and a password."

More MongoDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not expensive."

"There are different licenses available to be purchased, such as individual, premium, or enterprise."

"There is an annual subscription for the use of this solution."

"We use the open-source version, which is available to use free of charge."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"This is an open-source solution."

"It's open-source."

"There is an enterprise license and it could be cheaper. We are using the free open source version."

"MongoDB is a free solution. We wanted to have high availability and the subscription cost was quite expensive because the basic one is free and then when you want to have some other replications or other features you will need to pay money. Overall the solution is expensive."

More MongoDB pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon QLDB?

The product enables the users to query results faster.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon QLDB?

The product is not expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon QLDB?

The product should enable users to import data from various databases. It would be a nice additional improvement. It should also provide more instances.

See all answers

What do you like most about MongoDB?

MongoDB's approach to handling data in documents rather than traditional tables has been particularly beneficial.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB?

We pay approximately 2,000 euros per month for MongoDB.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB?

I'm not sure about the documentation or the knowledge bases available for MongoDB because I don't interact with it at that level, but I would say it's minimal and could be improved. I am not experi...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

InfluxDB vs MongoDB

Compared 13% of the time

Couchbase vs MongoDB

Compared 9% of the time

Cassandra vs MongoDB

Compared 8% of the time

Milvus vs MongoDB

Compared 8% of the time

Qdrant vs MongoDB

Compared 5% of the time

More MongoDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

July 2025

Download Amazon QLDB product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB

July 2025

Download MongoDB product report

Also Known As

Amazon Quantum Ledger Database

No data available

Overview

Amazon QLDB is a fully managed ledger database that provides a transparent, immutable, and cryptographically verifiable transaction log ‎owned by a central trusted authority. Amazon QLDB tracks each and every application data change and maintains a complete and verifiable history of changes over time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

MongoDB is a flexible and scalable NoSQL database solution that efficiently handles both structured and unstructured data. It is known for its ease of use, JSON capabilities, and efficient data handling, making it ideal for developer-friendly environments.

MongoDB stands out with features like sharding, geospatial indexing, and its open-source nature. Users find it fast and appreciate its seamless integration into different applications. Despite being powerful, it remains straightforward to set up and use, bolstered by a clustering and aggregation framework that enhances its functionality. While generally appreciated for its cost-effectiveness and broad application compatibility, there is room for improvement in security, enterprise integration, and the creation of more robust training and documentation resources. Enhancing performance and adding support for traditional relational database concepts could also prove beneficial.

What are MongoDB's most important features?

Scalability: Efficiently manages growing data volumes.
Flexibility: Supports structured and unstructured data with ease.
Sharding: Distributes data across multiple servers.
Geospatial Indexing: Enables location-based data handling.
Open-source: Wide community support and customization.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overall database management expenses.
Ease of Use: Simplifies database setup and maintenance.
Developer-friendly: Accelerates application development with supportive tools.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to evolving business requirements.

MongoDB finds widespread application across industries like healthcare, logistics, and telecommunications. It efficiently powers IoT platforms, data analytics, and document management systems. Its schema flexibility and JSON storage capabilities make it ideal for real-time processing and multi-server databases, essential for handling large-scale data volumes in modern applications.

MongoDB

Sample Customers

accenture, digital asset, health direct, klarna, osano, realm, smaato, splunk, wipro, zilliant

Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.