Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Apica comparison

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Read 11 Apica reviews

655 Views
361 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Apica and Amazon OpenSearch Service are used in different IT solutions. Amazon OpenSearch Service seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive features, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Apica is praised for monitoring capabilities, real-time data analysis, and ease of integration. Amazon OpenSearch Service stands out for comprehensive search features, scalability, and advanced functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Apica needs better reporting tools, more detailed analytics, and some users believe enhancing these would add value. Amazon OpenSearch Service can improve on configuration complexity, user documentation, and overall user guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apica receives positive feedback for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Amazon OpenSearch Service is seen as more complex to deploy, but its comprehensive support is valued once in use.

Pricing and ROI: Apica is noted for cost-effectiveness and quick return on investment. Amazon OpenSearch Service is perceived as more expensive but delivers high value through advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Apica Report (Updated: April 2025).

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Apica

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon OpenSearch Service

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

20th

Ranking in Log Management

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Apica

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

16th

Ranking in Log Management

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Operations Analytics (5th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Amazon OpenSearch Service is 1.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Apica is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

VijayKumar27

Software Engineer at The American College

Effective as a vector store, serverless architecture but there aren't enough security features

The pricing aspect is a concern. The service is way too costly. For the past month, I used only 30 to 40 MB of data, and the cost was $500. AWS could improve pricing. Even being serverless, it incurs charges during idle times. For just holding data, you need to create a list. AWS should add an option to make data idle, so it won't include computing charges. They charge for OCU units based on the time the serverless solution is up, not on indexing or retrieval speed. Once the service starts, it starts getting billed. It would help if there were an option to limit computing. When using it as a database, storing data without frequent fetching would save computing costs.

Read full review

Noorul Mustafa Khan

Senior Associate Vice President at Wells Fargo

Validates content and perform login functionalities on front-end applications

First of all, it will depend on the type of application. If it's a web application, I would recommend implementing it in your lower environment first and checking for functionality. If you are satisfied, then push it to the higher environments. Apica has detected server-related issues and various web application-related issues promptly, alerting us in a timely manner. This allowed us to implement automation within our processes, ensuring comprehensive performance monitoring from failure detection to recovery. It was pretty easy to learn. I attended a couple of sessions with team members. They provided knowledge transfer, which took about a week. After that, I was able to onboard the company. However, for minor issues, I would still contact them. If you're a quick learner, it could take just a couple of weeks to get the hang of it. You can integrate Apica architect into your system because they provide APIs. With these APIs, you can utilize Apica where and when it's needed. For instance, you can create your own microservices to automate tasks or integrate it with tools like Postman. This flexibility allows you to embed Apica into various automation processes or any other functionalities you require. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This service already sorts data like vectors. They have classified the storage pre-defined."

"Amazon OpenSearch Service provides a managed database solution, so we don't need to manage everything ourselves."

"We retrieve historical data with just a click of a button to move it from cold to hot or warm because it's already stored in the backend storage"

"Amazon OpenSearch Service has enhanced our organization's ability to store and search large amounts of data efficiently."

"The business analytics capabilities are the most important feature it provides."

"I would definitely recommend Amazon OpenSearch Service to other professionals due to its fast and reliable search capabilities."

"The customer service is excellent, rated nine out of ten."

"APICa allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."

"Our application SREs do script checks in such a way that closely mimic our customers' actions using the platform. Because there are so many different ways and options to be able to configure checks to closely mirror your applications' capabilities, it provides a lot of optionality for teams to create the right type of check that can notify when there are any issues. At the end of the day, we want our monitoring tools to be able to catch any outage before our customers do. This is where Apica Synthetic does a great job."

"The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery."

"It helps with releases because we monitor them in staging. We can tell if something is critically wrong before it gets into production, e.g., if it was load related or function related and also what was different in the dev stage. It then alerts us straightaway inside of our production monitors once it has been released. Therefore, it has improved how we run our systems since we monitor multiple environments."

"There are several features that are really good. The first one is the flexibility and the advanced configuration that Apica offers when it comes to configuring synthetic checks. It provides the ability to customize how the check should be performed and it is very flexible in the number of synthetic locations that it can use. It allows us to run scripts from different locations all over the world, and they have a really good number of these locations."

"Anyone can understand the solution easily because it doesn't require a specific scripted language."

"The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integrate with other tools with a separate execution environment. The tool is also easy to use."

"We see the benefit almost every day. It allows us to be alerted whenever there is a store that is not responding properly around the world. We do have a network operation center (NOC) who receives these alerts, immediately checking if everything is okay."

More Apica pros

Cons

"The pricing aspect is a concern. The service is way too costly. For the past month, I used only 30 to 40 MB of data, and the cost was $500. AWS could improve pricing."

"The price is fair yet leans towards the expensive side. I'd rate it five out of ten with respect to capabilities vs. cost."

"It would be beneficial to have some level of customization available in the managed service, tailored to the specific use cases of the end users."

"We faced documentation challenges during integration after migrating from Elasticsearch to Amazon OpenSearch Service. Better documentation on integration, query handling, and a more user-friendly UI could enhance the product."

"They can enhance data visualization."

"One improvement I would like to see is support for auto-scaling."

"It is difficult to create a script using ZebraTester."

"The having to install an application on your desktop to utilize something like ZebraTester is a little cumbersome. It would be nice to see that become a web-based application. Having the documentation a little more accessible, and easier to digest by people who are just learning how to use the framework, especially when it comes to more complex or more edge-based cases would be really helpful to have."

"When it comes to the way the internal agent is installed, because you can install an application on a server, I would love to see the application Docker-ized. If you could install internal agents using Docker or using containers, it would be easier for us to manage them and spin up internal agents."

"Alerting needs improvement. It's a little noisy. It needs some better options. Currently, they have an issue, when you set up a synthetic monitor, you can set up where it's monitoring from, a data center that Apica owns."

"Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently."

"Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow."

"We have been focused on reducing polling times for synthetic checks. We have gone from 10 minutes down to five minutes for a pretty broad swath, but there is some appetite to reduce that further, which could be an improvement."

"The tool does not provide automatic correlation features."

More Apica cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."

"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."

"Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."

"I am sure that Apica's price will be lower than LoadRunner."

"I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides."

"The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."

"License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

34%

Computer Software Company

11%

Media Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon OpenSearch Service?

We retrieve historical data with just a click of a button to move it from cold to hot or warm because it's already stored in the backend storage

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon OpenSearch Service?

Amazon OpenSearch Service is a bit costly compared to self-hosted Elasticsearch due to the managed service pricing.

What needs improvement with Amazon OpenSearch Service?

I did not delve deeply into Amazon OpenSearch Service, so I am unable to suggest specific improvements. However, we faced documentation challenges during integration after migrating from Elasticsea...

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

Grafana Loki vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Comparisons

Compared 30% of the time

Datadog vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 17% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Amazon OpenSearch Service

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon OpenSearch Service Competitors

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 26% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 19% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 17% of the time

Grafana vs Apica

Compared 14% of the time

AlertSite vs Apica

Compared 13% of the time

More Apica Competitors

Product Reports

Amazon OpenSearch Service

May 2025

Download Amazon OpenSearch Service product report

Download Apica product report

May 2025

Also Known As

No data available

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

Overview

Amazon OpenSearch Service is often used for log analysis, real-time application monitoring, and searching large datasets. Users benefit from its scalability, ease of use, and AWS integration, appreciating its capability to handle high data volumes while providing efficient search functionalities.

Many users choose Amazon OpenSearch Service for its powerful search and indexing capabilities, real-time analytics, and strong integration with AWS services. Key highlights include minimal downtime, detailed documentation, and efficient data processing. Scalability and automatic scaling are standout features, enabling users to manage high data volumes seamlessly. However, there is a call for improved integration, enhanced stability, and better support. Some users find the setup and configuration process challenging and desire more customization options for security features.

What are the key features of Amazon OpenSearch Service?

Scalability: Automatically scales to accommodate data growth and workload fluctuations.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides up-to-date insights and monitoring for applications.
Integration with AWS: Easily integrates with other AWS services, enhancing workflows.
Powerful Search Capabilities: Fast and efficient search and indexing functionalities.
Detailed Documentation: Comprehensive guides and resources to assist users.
Security Features: Flexible security options to protect data and manage access.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Quick data processing and minimal downtime.
Scalability: Ability to handle increasing data volumes without manual intervention.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface and management tools.
Reliability: Consistent performance with robust support for data management workflows.
Integration: Seamless integration with existing AWS services and infrastructure.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, Amazon OpenSearch Service is implemented to manage and analyze large datasets in real time. Companies benefit from its ability to monitor application performance, analyze log data, and enhance search functionalities, leading to improved operational efficiency and decision-making processes.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Apica offers a unified platform to remove complexity and cost associated with data management. You collect, control, store, and observe your data and can quickly identify and resolve performance issues before they impact the end-user. Apica Ascent swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform simplifies data collection by automating and managing agents through the platform’s Fleet product. Its Flow product simplifies and optimizes pipeline control with AI and ML to help you easily understand complex workflows. Its Store component allows you to never run out of storage space while you index and store machine data centrally on one platform and reduce costs, and remediate faster. Observe offers modern observability data management, helping you with MELT data, effortless dashboarding, and seamless integration of synthetic and real data.

Experience the Apica Ascent Platform

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo