

Find out in this report how the two Streaming Analytics solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Returns depend on the application you deploy and the amount of benefits you are getting, which depends on how many applications you are deploying, what are the sorts of applications, and what are the requirements.
They can manage most of our queries, and for what they cannot manage, they guide us through the process of finding out.
Amazon's support is excellent.
I was getting prompt responses, and it was nicely handled regarding the support.
I would rate them eight if 10 was the best and one was the worst.
The functionality for scaling comes out of the box and is very effective.
As a B2B enterprise client, our clientele consists of large ticket clients but low amounts of users.
According to me, it is quite scalable in terms of all the data it can handle and stream.
It doesn't require any maintenance on my end yet, as I haven't had any issues.
The increase in cloud costs by 50% to 60% does not justify the savings.
The only issue with Amazon MSK that we are facing is the configurations.
I had to remove and drop all the clusters and recreate them again, which is complicated in a production environment.
If it were easier to configure clusters and had more straightforward configuration, high-level API abstraction in the APIs could improve it.
Regarding additional improvements, I would say probably around error handling, where when we encounter errors specific to our response structures and everything, or the tables or anything of that nature, it would be better if we were prompted with better error handling mechanisms.
Observability and monitoring are areas that could be enhanced.
Once we started using Kafka, our cloud costs rose by 50% to 60%.
We use Kafka M5 Large instance, and depending on the instances, that is the cost we have, along with storage cost and data transfer costs.
I thought Confluent would stop me when I crossed the credits, but it did not, and then I got charged.
The scalability and usability are quite remarkable.
The best features of Amazon MSK are the real-time analytics that are excellent.
Amazon MSK is basically Kafka in the cloud, and when you need to create a cluster of Kafka brokers, Amazon MSK helps with that by automatically creating all the brokers according to the configuration you provide.
These features are important due to scalability and resiliency.
The Kafka Streams API helps with real-time data transformations and aggregations.
The best features Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud offers would be the connection with various external systems through various languages such as Python and C#.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Amazon MSK | 4.0% |
| Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud | 0.9% |
| Other | 95.1% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Amazon MSK offers seamless AWS integration, simplifying development and operation. It supports efficient data streaming and ensures cost-effective scalability without additional setup needs.
Amazon MSK stands out for its effortless creation, deployment, and access to new features without complex VPC configurations. Automating scalability, it demands minimal intervention, making it ideal for high-volume workflows. Developers benefit from real-time analytics, event sourcing, and log ingestion, aiding in dashboard maintenance and user log tracking. However, integration challenges exist as some face inflexibility, intricate configurations, and plugin development difficulties. Schema validation, connector variety, and complex update processes lead some to seek alternatives. Noteworthy for order data streaming, transaction tracking in retail and banking, and other real-time data applications, Amazon MSK remains attractive despite high cost concerns.
What are Amazon MSK's key features?In retail and banking, Amazon MSK facilitates order data streaming and transaction tracking. Its capabilities in supporting CDC pipelines, high-volume data management, and asynchronous processes make it favorable for integrating systems, streaming IoT data, and managing dashboard flows. Challenges in integration and configuration persist, nudging users to explore different options in certain contexts.
Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud provides real-time data streaming with seamless integration, enhanced scalability, and efficient data processing, recognized for its real-time architecture, ease of use, and reliable multi-cloud operations while effectively managing large data volumes.
Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud is designed to handle large-scale data operations across different cloud environments. It supports real-time data streaming, crucial for applications in transaction processing, change data capture, microservices, and enterprise data movement. Users benefit from features like schema registry and error handling, which ensure efficient and reliable operations. While the platform offers extensive connector support and reduced maintenance, there are areas requiring improvement, including better data analysis features, PyTRAN CDC integration, and cost-effective access to premium connectors. Migrating with Kubernetes and managing message states are areas for development as well. Despite these challenges, it remains a robust option for organizations seeking to distribute data effectively for analytics and real-time systems across industries like retail and finance.
What are the key features of Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud?In industries like retail and finance, Apache Kafka on Confluent Cloud is implemented to manage real-time location tracking, event-driven systems, and enterprise-level data distribution. It aids in operations that require robust data streaming, such as CDC, log processing, and analytics data distribution, providing a significant edge in data management and operational efficiency.
We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.