Amazon EMR vs Microsoft Analytics Platform System comparison

"Amazon EMR is a good solution that can be used to manage big data."

"Amazon EMR has multiple connectors that can connect to various data sources."

"The project management is very streamlined."

"In Amazon EMR it is easy to rebuild anything, easy to upgrade and has good fault tolerance."

"Amazon EMR's most valuable features are processing speed and data storage capacity."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The ability to resize the cluster is what really makes it stand out over other Hadoop and big data solutions."

"The solution is pretty simple to set up."

"This is a well-integrated solution and that integration empowers results."

"Helps our customers to discover trends, which provides useful information based on their business."

"We leverage its capabilities for many applications. We can integrate with our databases, like Oracle, MySQL, or any other, using Microsoft Integration Services."

"It is closely integrated with other products in the MS portfolio."

"This solution will connect to any database, you can combine databases, and you can create a cube or tabular model."

"I like that it's integrated with other Azure products."

"Microsoft Analytics Platform System's most valuable feature is its ecosystems and seamless integration with other Microsoft reporting platforms and databases."

"The Cube Solution is quite different when compared to the rest of the competition and has unique functionality for advanced analytics."

"The product's features for storing data in static clusters could be better."

"The dashboard management could be better. Right now, it's lacking a bit."

"Amazon EMR can improve by adding some features, such as megastore services and HiveServer2. Additionally, the user interface could be better, similar to what Apache service provides, cross-platform services."

"Amazon EMR is continuously improving, but maybe something like CI/CD out-of-the-box or integration with Prometheus Grafana."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"There is room for improvement with respect to retries, handling the volume of data on S3 buckets, cluster provisioning, scaling, termination, security, and integration between services like S3, Glue, Lake Formation, and DynamoDB."

"The problem for us is it starts very slow."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"Functionality needs to be more up-to-date with competing products."

"Releases of new products and functionality is never accompanied by associated documentation, training and resources that adequately explain the release."

"Microsoft Analytics Platform System could have better support."

"I think the biggest problem with the product is that it does a data ingest model, which is very expensive."

"Machine learning and artificial intelligence capabilities need to be more friendly for beginning users."

"The pricing model needs to be improved."

"The flexibility of this solution needs to be improved because you cannot make changes at every one of the different steps."

"​Hybrid environments are complex to manage."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. It can be expensive since it's a managed service, and if you are not careful, you can run into unexpected charges. You can make a mistake that costs you tens of thousands of dollars. That's happened to us twice, so I'm sensitive to it. We're still trying to work on that. Our smallest client probably spends a hundred thousand dollars yearly on licensing, while our largest is well over a million."

"The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"You don't need to pay for licensing on a yearly or monthly basis, you only pay for what you use, in terms of underlying instances."

"There is a small fee for the EMR system, but major cost components are the underlying infrastructure resources which we actually use."

"Amazon EMR is not very expensive."

"The cost of Amazon EMR is very high."

"Amazon EMR's price is reasonable."

"Users have to pay extra for premium-level technical support."

"We are currently paying $200,000 a year for all the different parts of the suite during an ingest model Microsoft now charges us $700,000 a year."

"The initial price is lower than Oracle, but extensive use of SQL may lead to a higher total cost of ownership."

"I rate Microsoft Analytics Platform System a seven out of ten for pricing."