Amazon EMR vs Microsoft Analytics Platform System comparison

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"The security of the managed workflow and the managed services are the best features for us. Since we inherited their security model and it's all managed services, those are the key benefits for our clients."

"The solution is pretty simple to set up."

"Amazon EMR has multiple connectors that can connect to various data sources."

"We are using applications, such as Splunk, Livy, Hadoop, and Spark. We are using all of these applications in Amazon EMR and they're helping us a lot."

"When we grade big jobs from on-prem to the cloud, we do it in EMR with Spark."

"The solution is scalable."

"Amazon EMR is a good solution that can be used to manage big data."

"This is a well-integrated solution and that integration empowers results."

"This solution will connect to any database, you can combine databases, and you can create a cube or tabular model."

"We leverage its capabilities for many applications. We can integrate with our databases, like Oracle, MySQL, or any other, using Microsoft Integration Services."

"Helps our customers to discover trends, which provides useful information based on their business."

"Microsoft Analytics Platform System's most valuable feature is its ecosystems and seamless integration with other Microsoft reporting platforms and databases."

"It is closely integrated with other products in the MS portfolio."

"The Cube Solution is quite different when compared to the rest of the competition and has unique functionality for advanced analytics."

"I like that it's integrated with other Azure products."

"Amazon EMR can improve by adding some features, such as megastore services and HiveServer2. Additionally, the user interface could be better, similar to what Apache service provides, cross-platform services."

"The product's features for storing data in static clusters could be better."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"As people are shifting from legacy solutions to other technologies, Amazon EMR needs to add more features that give more flexibility in managing user data."

"The solution can become expensive if you are not careful."

"The dashboard management could be better. Right now, it's lacking a bit."

"We don't have much control. If we have multiple users, if they want to scale up, the cost will go and increase and we don't know how we can restrict that price part."

"The product must add some of the latest technologies to provide more flexibility to the users."

"I think the biggest problem with the product is that it does a data ingest model, which is very expensive."

"The flexibility of this solution needs to be improved because you cannot make changes at every one of the different steps."

"Functionality needs to be more up-to-date with competing products."

"​Hybrid environments are complex to manage."

"The pricing model needs to be improved."

"Machine learning and artificial intelligence capabilities need to be more friendly for beginning users."

"We need better real-time analytics capabilities. It's a bit challenging for us."

"Releases of new products and functionality is never accompanied by associated documentation, training and resources that adequately explain the release."

"You don't need to pay for licensing on a yearly or monthly basis, you only pay for what you use, in terms of underlying instances."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"There is a small fee for the EMR system, but major cost components are the underlying infrastructure resources which we actually use."

"Amazon EMR is not very expensive."

"Amazon EMR's price is reasonable."

"The cost of Amazon EMR is very high."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. It can be expensive since it's a managed service, and if you are not careful, you can run into unexpected charges. You can make a mistake that costs you tens of thousands of dollars. That's happened to us twice, so I'm sensitive to it. We're still trying to work on that. Our smallest client probably spends a hundred thousand dollars yearly on licensing, while our largest is well over a million."

"The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"We are currently paying $200,000 a year for all the different parts of the suite during an ingest model Microsoft now charges us $700,000 a year."

"I rate Microsoft Analytics Platform System a seven out of ten for pricing."

"Users have to pay extra for premium-level technical support."

"The initial price is lower than Oracle, but extensive use of SQL may lead to a higher total cost of ownership."