Amazon EMR vs Microsoft Analytics Platform System comparison

"The project management is very streamlined."

"Amazon EMR has multiple connectors that can connect to various data sources."

"We are using applications, such as Splunk, Livy, Hadoop, and Spark. We are using all of these applications in Amazon EMR and they're helping us a lot."

"When we grade big jobs from on-prem to the cloud, we do it in EMR with Spark."

"The solution helps us manage huge volumes of data."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"In Amazon EMR it is easy to rebuild anything, easy to upgrade and has good fault tolerance."

"It allows users to access the data through a web interface."

"This is a well-integrated solution and that integration empowers results."

"Microsoft Analytics Platform System's most valuable feature is its ecosystems and seamless integration with other Microsoft reporting platforms and databases."

"It is closely integrated with other products in the MS portfolio."

"We leverage its capabilities for many applications. We can integrate with our databases, like Oracle, MySQL, or any other, using Microsoft Integration Services."

"I like that it's integrated with other Azure products."

"The Cube Solution is quite different when compared to the rest of the competition and has unique functionality for advanced analytics."

"Helps our customers to discover trends, which provides useful information based on their business."

"This solution will connect to any database, you can combine databases, and you can create a cube or tabular model."

"We don't have much control. If we have multiple users, if they want to scale up, the cost will go and increase and we don't know how we can restrict that price part."

"The initial setup was time-consuming."

"Amazon EMR can improve by adding some features, such as megastore services and HiveServer2. Additionally, the user interface could be better, similar to what Apache service provides, cross-platform services."

"Amazon EMR is continuously improving, but maybe something like CI/CD out-of-the-box or integration with Prometheus Grafana."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"Spark jobs take longer on Amazon EMR compared to previous experiences."

"The problem for us is it starts very slow."

"There is room for improvement with respect to retries, handling the volume of data on S3 buckets, cluster provisioning, scaling, termination, security, and integration between services like S3, Glue, Lake Formation, and DynamoDB."

"I think the biggest problem with the product is that it does a data ingest model, which is very expensive."

"The pricing model needs to be improved."

"The flexibility of this solution needs to be improved because you cannot make changes at every one of the different steps."

"Releases of new products and functionality is never accompanied by associated documentation, training and resources that adequately explain the release."

"Microsoft Analytics Platform System could have better support."

"​Hybrid environments are complex to manage."

"Functionality needs to be more up-to-date with competing products."

"We need better real-time analytics capabilities. It's a bit challenging for us."

"The cost of Amazon EMR is very high."

"The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. It can be expensive since it's a managed service, and if you are not careful, you can run into unexpected charges. You can make a mistake that costs you tens of thousands of dollars. That's happened to us twice, so I'm sensitive to it. We're still trying to work on that. Our smallest client probably spends a hundred thousand dollars yearly on licensing, while our largest is well over a million."

"There is a small fee for the EMR system, but major cost components are the underlying infrastructure resources which we actually use."

"Amazon EMR's price is reasonable."

"You don't need to pay for licensing on a yearly or monthly basis, you only pay for what you use, in terms of underlying instances."

"I rate Microsoft Analytics Platform System a seven out of ten for pricing."

"The initial price is lower than Oracle, but extensive use of SQL may lead to a higher total cost of ownership."

"We are currently paying $200,000 a year for all the different parts of the suite during an ingest model Microsoft now charges us $700,000 a year."

"Users have to pay extra for premium-level technical support."