Amazon EMR vs Microsoft Analytics Platform System comparison

"Amazon EMR has multiple connectors that can connect to various data sources."

"We are using applications, such as Splunk, Livy, Hadoop, and Spark. We are using all of these applications in Amazon EMR and they're helping us a lot."

"One of the valuable features about this solution is that it's managed services, so it's pretty stable, and scalable as much as you wish. It has all the necessary distributions. With some additional work, it's also possible to change to a Spark version with the latest version of EMR. It also has Hudi, so we are leveraging Apache Hudi on EMR for change data capture, so then it comes out-of-the-box in EMR."

"The solution is pretty simple to set up."

"Amazon EMR provides out-of-the-box functionality because we can deploy and get Spark functionality over Hadoop."

"The solution helps us manage huge volumes of data."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"When we grade big jobs from on-prem to the cloud, we do it in EMR with Spark."

"It is closely integrated with other products in the MS portfolio."

"This is a well-integrated solution and that integration empowers results."

"I like that it's integrated with other Azure products."

"Microsoft Analytics Platform System's most valuable feature is its ecosystems and seamless integration with other Microsoft reporting platforms and databases."

"Helps our customers to discover trends, which provides useful information based on their business."

"We leverage its capabilities for many applications. We can integrate with our databases, like Oracle, MySQL, or any other, using Microsoft Integration Services."

"This solution will connect to any database, you can combine databases, and you can create a cube or tabular model."

"The Cube Solution is quite different when compared to the rest of the competition and has unique functionality for advanced analytics."

"The initial setup was time-consuming."

"The product must add some of the latest technologies to provide more flexibility to the users."

"We don't have much control. If we have multiple users, if they want to scale up, the cost will go and increase and we don't know how we can restrict that price part."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"In Qubole, the interface was very good. I could see many details because in Amazon EMR console, very few details are available."

"Amazon EMR is continuously improving, but maybe something like CI/CD out-of-the-box or integration with Prometheus Grafana."

"The legacy versions of the solution are not supported in the new versions."

"The most complicated thing is configuring to the cluster and ensure it's running correctly."

"Microsoft Analytics Platform System could have better support."

"Functionality needs to be more up-to-date with competing products."

"Machine learning and artificial intelligence capabilities need to be more friendly for beginning users."

"​Hybrid environments are complex to manage."

"I think the biggest problem with the product is that it does a data ingest model, which is very expensive."

"We need better real-time analytics capabilities. It's a bit challenging for us."

"The pricing model needs to be improved."

"The flexibility of this solution needs to be improved because you cannot make changes at every one of the different steps."

"Amazon EMR is not very expensive."

"The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"There is a small fee for the EMR system, but major cost components are the underlying infrastructure resources which we actually use."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"Amazon EMR's price is reasonable."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. It can be expensive since it's a managed service, and if you are not careful, you can run into unexpected charges. You can make a mistake that costs you tens of thousands of dollars. That's happened to us twice, so I'm sensitive to it. We're still trying to work on that. Our smallest client probably spends a hundred thousand dollars yearly on licensing, while our largest is well over a million."

"You don't need to pay for licensing on a yearly or monthly basis, you only pay for what you use, in terms of underlying instances."

"I rate Microsoft Analytics Platform System a seven out of ten for pricing."

"The initial price is lower than Oracle, but extensive use of SQL may lead to a higher total cost of ownership."

"Users have to pay extra for premium-level technical support."

"We are currently paying $200,000 a year for all the different parts of the suite during an ingest model Microsoft now charges us $700,000 a year."