We performed a comparison between Amazon EKS and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Container Security."The tool works well with the nodes in AWS. It's scalability is also good in terms of architecture."
"I like its auto-scale feature very much."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"The solution's Autoscaler option allows for an increase in worker notes whenever particular thresholds are exceeded."
"We haven't faced any major issues in one and a half years of use."
"The stability is excellent."
"Provides high performance and easy manageability."
"It is a scalable solution."
"AKS as a service is very good when you need to leverage applications or functions with much variability in their usage because you're trying to be as efficient as you can with resources."
"It is a stable solution."
"Integration and automation are the best features of the solution."
"AKS is easy to use. We can scale up and down as needed with AKS, which saves us money on our cloud costs."
"It employs high availability."
"Azure Kubernetes Service is pretty robust in terms of scalability and auto-scaling fixes."
"The most valuable features of AKS are the full array of capabilities and robust security."
"The most valuable feature is the autoscaling and self-healing."
"The solution should include a popup for clusters so that all relevant information is visible at the bottom of a page."
"I'd like improved traffic handling and additional application details within the system."
"An area for improvement in Amazon EKS is the user experience. The platform could be more user-friendly. Only an expert can manage and use it."
"I believe the initial setup could be a better experience and faster customer support."
"The tool's setup is complex."
"They should enhance the Jira integration."
"I encountered problems with the product’s documentation."
"It is very cumbersome to assign permissions to users to interact with a cluster."
"This is a fairly expensive solution, which can make it prohibitive for smaller organizations."
"There are a lot of features that should be included with the AKS."
"Configuration management and troubleshooting performance issues are difficult to solve and could be made easier."
"I would like to see the stability get more synchronized."
"Sometimes, it fails to provide specific metrics."
"The application firewall is lacking some features and there is room for enhancement."
"The solution's cost could be cheaper."
"In terms of cost perspective, they could make the product more affordable."
More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Amazon EKS is ranked 15th in Container Security with 38 reviews while Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is ranked 13th in Container Security with 32 reviews. Amazon EKS is rated 8.6, while Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon EKS writes "Supports multiple tools and has a straightforward setup process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) writes "Decreases administrative burdens and costs, has good diagnostic tools, and is easy to deploy". Amazon EKS is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs and Linode, whereas Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is most compared with OpenShift, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, SUSE Rancher, Qualys VMDR and Tenable.io Container Security.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
