Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Oracle solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #11 in CS , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 3.0% mindshare in the category. Oracle is ranked #15 in PCSS , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Read 18 Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) reviews

9,027 Views
1,896 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Database Backup Service

Read 12 Oracle Database Backup Service reviews

1,903 Views
1,865 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Oracle Database Backup Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, CTERA, Google and others in Cloud Storage.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Storage Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Storage

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (11th), File and Object Storage (14th)

Oracle Database Backup Service

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Public Cloud Storage Services (15th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Cloud Services solutions, they serve different purposes. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is designed for Cloud Storage and holds a mindshare of 3.0%, down 5.0% compared to last year.
Oracle Database Backup Service, on the other hand, focuses on Public Cloud Storage Services, holds 3.1% mindshare, up 1.3% since last year.

Cloud Storage Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)	3.0%
Dropbox Business - Enterprise	6.5%
Box - Intelligent Content Management	4.7%
Other	85.8%

Cloud Storage

Public Cloud Storage Services Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle Database Backup Service	3.1%
Amazon S3	14.5%
Amazon S3 Glacier	11.1%
Other	71.3%

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

reviewer2784675

Sr. Technical Account Manager at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Serverless file storage has simplified multi-tenant Linux workloads and supports effortless growth

When I started working with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), I faced a few issues. One issue was around the number of IOPS limitation. Initially, the number of IOPS that could be performed on the Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) file system was quite low. Later on, it has been increased, and now I believe it is at a level where only very specific workloads might not perform optimally, but otherwise everything should work smoothly. By the time I was there, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) was supporting NFS version 4.1, not 4.2. Currently, it is supported up to NFS 4.1. A notable limitation of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is that it does not support Windows. If your workload is running on a Linux operating system and you do not want to manage it or even understand NFS at all, you should still be able to use it fairly quickly. There are scenarios where Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) might not work effectively. For example, database-type workloads do not run properly on Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) because at the end of the day, it is a network file system and requests must travel from one place to another and then return. This process takes time, so if you are running a database-type workload, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) might not be the right approach, and you would need to look elsewhere.

Read full review

Hosney Osman

Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone

Achieve high availability and security with automated tasks over a decade

While there are some disadvantages in this product, from my experience with basic use cases, daily tasks, integration, scheduling, saving, and encryption, I have not encountered significant areas for improvement. However, the addition of a GUI configuration management and administration console for all administrative tasks would be highly beneficial. It would be preferable to have the ability to perform all console, terminal, and command line operations through a GUI interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"There are huge money savings, as we can save more than half of our costs."

"The first valuable thing is it is scalable."

"Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS."

"We need our storage to expand based on demand but storage is a bit costly, so we start with a smaller amount and, as we grow, we use EFS on demand and it manages our costs."

"Its elasticity and flexible pricing are the most valuable. For Amazon EFS, you are charged based on the storage. It is also very fast and stable with a very simple and intuitive interface."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"We can run code and deploy it whenever we want."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) pros

"We've definitely seen an ROI despite this being an expensive solution."

"I like the stability and the scalability of this product."

"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."

"I am satisfied with the licensing policy and pricing of this product."

"It's a scalable product."

"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."

"The backup is reliable and intuitive."

"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."

More Oracle Database Backup Service pros

Cons

"I don't have notes on improvements."

"Initially, the cost of storage seems to be small, but customer cost for the storage is really very high and this doesn't work for India."

"The lack of transparency in the costs attached to the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The product's stability has some shortcomings where improvements are required."

"It should be simplified. There are people who don't have cloud experience. It should be storage that we are able to just connect to."

"Amazon EFS is more costly compared to other storage options available from AWS."

"The main challenge with EFS is its cost, which is slightly higher compared to EBS or S3."

"Their response was not prompt, and it took them a while to figure out solutions. While the time to respond was good, the time to resolve was not optimal, as it took more than a week."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) cons

"Pricing is an area that needs improvement. If you do a comparison with other products, it's more expensive and it stops a few customers from purchasing Oracle, especially the engineered systems that have the data and more, which are relatively expensive."

"The initial setup is overly complex, unnecessarily so."

"The installation process is easy for me because I have performed this action hundreds of times. However, it is important to note that beginners and even some senior professionals may encounter significant difficulties during installation."

"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."

"We cannot use the product with other brands."

"I have been working with Oracle Database Backup Service for five years, and it has already been quite an expensive and extensive experience."

"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."

"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."

More Oracle Database Backup Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The main challenge with EFS is its cost, which is slightly higher compared to EBS or S3. For one GB or ten GB of data, S3 is much cheaper. EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage."

"I would rate the pricing 7 out of 10."

"The product's price depends on the services and the size and capacity at which it is used in a business environment."

"The product charges are based on the amount of data stored."

"Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) offers a pay-as-you-go model, so whenever you use its services, you need to pay."

"The solution's price is mid-ranged."

"It has flexible pricing. You are charged based on your storage."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Oracle Database Backup Service a seven or eight out of ten."

"Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."

"The platform is expensive."

"The only problem with Oracle is its pricing."

"The platform is expensive."

"It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?

Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?

We don't need to purchase it; we are just using it and paying Amazon as per the utilization. We make direct payments to Amazon based on our usage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database Backup Service?

Oracle Database Backup Service is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database Backup Service?

There could be room for improvement regarding Oracle Database Backup Service, from the dashboard to pricing.I would like to see more AI, better customization, and additional features in future upda...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Database Backup Service?

Integration of Oracle Database Backup Service usually takes just a few hours.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 58% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 3% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 3% of the time

Dell PowerScale vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 3% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Competitors

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 30% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 20% of the time

Azure Blob Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 12% of the time

Wasabi vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 1% of the time

More Oracle Database Backup Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

September 2026

Download Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Database Backup Service

September 2026

Download Oracle Database Backup Service product report

Overview

Amazon EFS provides elastic file storage in the cloud, offering unlimited storage and seamless integration with AWS services for dynamic workloads.

Amazon EFS serves as a scalable, shareable file storage across Linux servers, seamlessly integrating with AWS for data-intensive applications. Its auto-scaling capability handles shifting data demands in real time, ensuring cost-effective storage management. Offering high availability and support for NFS version 4, Amazon EFS optimizes performance and data integrity for cloud and serverless environments. While its strengths lie in scalability and Linux support, further enhancements in cost transparency, Windows compatibility, and deployment simplicity can broaden its applicability.

What are the key features of Amazon EFS?

Flexible Scaling: Automatically adjusts storage capacity to meet dynamic workload demands.
Usage-based Pricing: Only charges for storage used, optimizing cost efficiency.
Integration with AWS: Seamlessly connects with services like EC2 for enhanced application support.
Auto-scaling: Efficiently allocates resources for fluctuating data needs.
Shared Access: Facilitates collaborative data use across various applications.

What benefits should users expect from Amazon EFS reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlined configuration and easy scaling of resources.
Cost Management: Reduced storage expenses through usage-based pricing.
Reliable Performance: Consistent data availability and stable system operations.
Improved Data Management: Simplified processes for handling extensive datasets.
Integration Capabilities: Smooth interoperability with AWS services enhances functionality.

Amazon EFS is widely implemented in industries needing robust cloud-based storage solutions, facilitating scalable storage for applications like web serving, content management, and data analytics. Its compatibility with EC2 and Linux optimizes resource management, supporting complex access needs and enhancing operational efficiency in technology-focused sectors.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Oracle Database Backup Service offers secure, scalable, and performance-optimized backup solutions. Its seamless integration and high availability features make it ideal for medium and large businesses managing extensive data volumes.

This service provides features like automated scheduling and recovery assurance, ensuring cost-efficiency and compliance for businesses. Reliable encrypted backups and an intuitive dashboard-driven interface enhance usability. Users can benefit from point-in-time recovery and robust integration capabilities, making it a dependable choice for data protection and recovery strategies.

What Are Key Features of Oracle Database Backup Service?

Differential and Cumulative Backup: Allows specific parts of the database to be backed up efficiently, saving time and storage space.
Automated Scheduling: Reduces operational costs by streamlining backup processes through automation.
Recovery Assurance: Comprehensive tools for reliable data recovery, safeguarding data.
Encrypted Backups: Ensures data security during storage and transmission.
Dashboard-Driven Interface: Simplifies management and monitoring through a user-friendly dashboard.
High Availability: Guarantees continuous data access and minimizes downtime.

What Benefits Should Users Expect from Reviews?

Cost Reduction: Significant savings from automated processes and optimized use of resources.
Regulatory Compliance: Supports adherence to industry regulations, reducing risks.
Security: Strong encryption and authentication methods protect sensitive information.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to growing business needs and data volumes.
Performance Tuning: Delivers optimized backup and recovery operations.

Oracle Database Backup Service is widely implemented in sectors such as banking and finance, where data reliability and security are paramount. Businesses utilize it for managing various types of backups, enabling efficient integration with SAP workloads. It plays a crucial role in ensuring business continuity and effective disaster recovery strategies, providing backend support that facilitates smooth project execution and server recovery.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend

Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, CTERA, Google and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.