Akamai Enterprise Application Access vs Google BeyondCorp Remote Access comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Akamai Enterprise Application Access and Google BeyondCorp Remote Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA as a Service Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Bill Lee
Use Google BeyondCorp Remote Access?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price is great it is all-inclusive, they use an enterprise cost model. That's what we like compared to other users. This is one of the main attractions of Akamai Enterprise Application Access. It's already an enterprise cost model established with us for services."
  • "Licensing is based on user count."
  • "The license can be shared based on the number of active users."
  • More Akamai Enterprise Application Access Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is very convenient and stable because you don't have to worry about attacks to public IPs or public networks.
    Top Answer:The license can be shared based on the number of active users. If you have 5,000 users but only 1,000 active users at one time, then you buy a license for 1,000 users.
    Top Answer:The solution has two agents so should combine its enterprise application and security access into one agent. It is more comfortable for users if they don't have to install two agents.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    14th
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    764
    Comparisons
    644
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    273
    Rating
    8.0
    18th
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    1,028
    Comparisons
    936
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Soha
    BeyondCorp Remote Access
    Learn More
    Overview

    Akamai Enterprise Application Access is a cloud-based solution that provides secure access to enterprise applications and data from any device, anywhere. It eliminates the need for traditional VPNs and allows organizations to easily manage access to applications and data for employees, partners, and customers. With its zero-trust approach, it ensures that only authorized users can access sensitive information, reducing the risk of data breaches.

    Google BeyondCorp Remote Access is a secure solution that enables organizations to provide remote access to their internal resources without the need for a traditional VPN. The primary use case for this product is to allow employees to securely access company resources from anywhere, ensuring productivity and flexibility.

    The most valuable functionality of Google BeyondCorp Remote Access is its zero-trust approach. It verifies every user and device attempting to connect, irrespective of their location, ensuring only authorized users gain access to resources. This eliminates the need for complex VPN configurations and reduces the risk of unauthorized access.

    By adopting Google BeyondCorp Remote Access, organizations can enhance their security posture and simplify access management. It provides granular control over user access, allowing administrators to set policies based on device health, user context, and other attributes. This reduces the attack surface and minimizes the risk of data breaches or unauthorized access to sensitive information. Furthermore, the product integrates seamlessly with other Google Cloud services, making it easy to manage and scale as per organizational requirements.

    Sample Customers
    Bugcrowd, InPowered, Spirent Communications
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Retailer7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    ZTNA as a Service
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: April 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Akamai Enterprise Application Access is ranked 14th in ZTNA as a Service with 3 reviews while Google BeyondCorp Remote Access is ranked 18th in ZTNA as a Service. Akamai Enterprise Application Access is rated 9.0, while Google BeyondCorp Remote Access is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Akamai Enterprise Application Access writes "Very scalable, convenient, and stable protection against attacks". On the other hand, Akamai Enterprise Application Access is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Zscaler Internet Access, Appgate SDP, Netskope and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Google BeyondCorp Remote Access is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Okta Workforce Identity, Netskope Private Access, Cloudflare Access and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks.

    See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.