Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aembit vs CyberArk Identity comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aembit
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (11th)
CyberArk Identity
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (10th), Identity Management (IM) (9th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (8th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Access Management (5th), Active Directory Management (6th), Cloud Resource Access Management (3rd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Identity and Access Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Aembit is designed for Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) and holds a mindshare of 2.5%.
CyberArk Identity, on the other hand, focuses on Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM), holds 3.8% mindshare, down 3.9% since last year.
Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Aembit2.5%
Astrix26.8%
Oasis24.8%
Other45.9%
Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM)
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
CyberArk Identity3.8%
Auth019.8%
Ping Identity Platform11.9%
Other64.5%
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Jai Anand - PeerSpot reviewer
Has strengthened identity controls and improved regulatory compliance across global operations
The initial deployment is complex and requires many users, making it more suitable for larger enterprises. It requires a number of users to get it deployed, particularly for on-premises deployments. This typically involves a lot of initial planning, setup, and configuration. Another important consideration is the cost. It can be quite expensive, making it more suitable for larger enterprises rather than small businesses or startups. The learning curve is also significant due to the numerous features and configurations available. Some features necessitate a detailed analysis and understanding to effectively work with this solution. Additionally, the user interface needs some improvements. It appears outdated compared to the technology we are using in 2025. The UI seems like it's from the early 2000s, making it look considerably behind the times, about 20 to 25 years old.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) solutions are best for your needs.
868,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?
The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?
I am not certain about CyberArk Identity's exact pricing model. For comparison, Okta was around five dollars per user. CyberArk Identity offers good discounts to some clients, which influences thei...
What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?
The reporting functionality is somewhat complicated. While I would rate CyberArk Identity and Okta on the same level, Okta's reporting is crisper and clearer. For CyberArk Identity, you need knowle...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Idaptive
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
Find out what your peers are saying about Entro Security, Astrix Security, Oasis Security and others in Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM). Updated: August 2025.
868,275 professionals have used our research since 2012.