ASP.NET vs Adobe Flash comparison

Adobe and Microsoft are both solutions in the .NET Development Services category. Adobe is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Adobe holds a 20.3% mindshare in NDS, compared to Microsoft’s 13.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Adobe users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Adobe Flash

Read 5 Adobe Flash reviews

320 Views
114 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ASP.NET

Read 30 ASP.NET reviews

384 Views
83 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Adobe Flash

ASP.NET

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe Flash and ASP.NET based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two .NET Development Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed ASP.NET vs. Adobe Flash Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ASP.NET vs. Adobe Flash

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Flash

Ranking in .NET Development Services

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ASP.NET

Ranking in .NET Development Services

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the .NET Development Services category, the mindshare of Adobe Flash is 20.3%, up from 10.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ASP.NET is 13.0%, up from 9.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

.NET Development Services

Featured Reviews

Arpit Raj Senapati

Software Engineer Trainee at Inaho Digital Solutions

Easy to set up with good functionality and adaptability.

I'm not sure how it could be better. It has everything I need for my work. It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available. We'd like it to have solutions within the product that can help us complete tasks a bit faster. It would be nice if the solution had some sort of bot or assistant within the solution to help us with work within the product. If we could deploy queries and get an answer faster, within 30 minutes, instead of within a day or two.

Read full review

Abhilash Cr

Solutions Architect at DreamOrbit

Very user-friendly and comes with in-built mechanisms for security and performance

With the technical stacks, what happened is that Microsoft evolved in such a way that the features that are available in other technologies were gradually incorporated into .NET or C# for any Microsoft technical areas, whether it is Azure or any other tech stack. So it's gradually happening. We already have some Power Apps and so on. At this moment, Power Apps is restricted within Azure or any kind of Microsoft environment. Such things in the future should be .NET Core. It should be open source or deployable to any operating system so that the dependency can be removed. And with a click, we can get a solution ready for deployment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I am impressed with the tool’s documentation."

"With the alliance with Microsoft, the product is perfectly integrated."

"Adobe Flash is simple and easy-to-use software. It is very familiar and compatible with other Adobe software, making it easier to use."

"The UI is really good."

"Without Adobe Flash player, I wouldn't be able to do my day-to-day functions."

"The solution is useful for seeing what old technology was before the new technology we use today, such as .NET."

"ASP.NET's best features are its application structure and API testing."

"The most valuable feature of ASP.NET is its visual side, which makes building Windows forms applications visually efficient."

"The solution has good scalability."

"It is easy to install ASP.NET on your laptop."

"The most valuable feature is that it's easy to use."

"While using ASP.net, we can create interactive websites."

"I would say that we have seen a return on investment when it comes to this solution."

More ASP.NET pros

Cons

"It would be nice to see Adobe Flash as a separate application instead of embedding it with other apps. I want the product to be a simple app. The product’s scalability is also one of its weak points."

"It would be ideal if there was more research on the product available."

"It would be nice to have more integration and faster integration."

"Adobe can focus on the gaming side mode."

"At times it can be slow, but other than that it is a great and helpful product."

"It should be open source or deployable to any operating system so that the dependency can be removed."

"Sometimes it can be really difficult to debug using ASP.NET. When there's an issue, trying to find out the cause is not always easy, so debugging is the top area for improvement, in my opinion."

"The solution's initial setup is intermediate, and it could be improved."

"ASP.NET is a very slow tool, and it should be faster."

"It could use better reporting and documentation."

"Scripted languages like AngularJS and Node.js are much faster than using ASP on the client side."

"It would be beneficial if Microsoft provided more support for certain technologies, such as Blazor, in the form of basic components. As it stands, some reliance on third-party tools may be necessary. Having more support from Microsoft for these technologies would make it easier for users to build and maintain applications. For example, the grids, date pickers, and dropdown lists would be components to add."

"There should be consistent customization related to security, features, and developers, making the solution more understandable and adaptable."

More ASP.NET cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is okay so far."

"The tool’s pricing is fair."

"The solution requires a licensing fee but is worth the investment."

"On a scale from one to ten, with one being cost efficient and 10 being the most expensive, I would rate ASP.NET's pricing at six. There used to be IAF, which you could spin on a Windows machine. However, that sort of setup does not exist for Linux machines. Because customers still prefer a Windows underlying infrastructure, it can get expensive."

"The pricing is somewhere in the middle. Not too expensive, but not the cheapest either."

"ASP.NET is open-source and free of charge."

"The solution is free to use."

"This is a free solution. However, we have some server licensing costs which are not directly a cost of using the solution."

"ASP.NET is not an expensive solution."

"I think ASP.NET, in deployment, is something that's quite costly when you're on a cloud provider such as Azure, and you have to pay the server cost. On average, it can cost approximately $1,000 per month to host a good site with a few databases."

More ASP.NET pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which .NET Development Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Adobe Flash?

Adobe Flash is simple and easy-to-use software. It is very familiar and compatible with other Adobe software, making it easier to use.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Adobe Flash?

Adobe can focus on the gaming side mode. They can customize the product because gaming is booming nowadays, and people can use it more for gaming by including programmers and designers to manipulat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Adobe Flash?

We use the solution for training and making small animations on Animate CC.

See all answers

What do you like most about ASP.NET?

It is easy to install ASP.NET on your laptop.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ASP.NET?

ASP.NET is not an expensive solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ASP.NET?

ASP.NET is a very slow tool, and it should be faster.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Silverlight vs Adobe Flash

Compared 100% of the time

More Adobe Flash Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

.NET Development Services

June 2025

Download Adobe Flash product report

Buyer's Guide

ASP.NET

June 2025

Download ASP.NET product report

Also Known As

Flash

No data available

Overview

The Adobe Flash Platform is the leading web design and development platform for creating expressive applications, content, and video that run consistently across operating systems and devices and reach over 98% of Internet-connected desktop users. The Flash Platform consists of an integrated set of technologies - including client runtimes, tools, frameworks, services, and servers - that provide everything you need to deliver applications, content, and high-definition video to the widest possible audience.

Adobe

ASP.NET is a free web framework for building web sites, apps and services with HTML, CSS and JavaScript.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

France T_l_visions, Globaloria, Mixamo, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Kienzle Automotive GmbH, Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Vengo Labs, Oneview Healthcare, BookedOut, Ministry of Rural Development, Grupo WRR

Buyer's Guide

ASP.NET vs. Adobe Flash

June 2025

Free Report: ASP.NET vs. Adobe Flash

Find out what your peers are saying about ASP.NET vs. Adobe Flash and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ASP.NET vs. Adobe Flash report.

See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.

We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.