Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs TFS comparison

Adaptavist and Microsoft are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Adaptavist is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.0, while Microsoft is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.4. Adaptavist holds a 2.5% mindshare in TMT, compared to Microsoft’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Adaptavist users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Read 5 Adaptavist Test Management for Jira reviews

440 Views
348 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

TFS

Read 99 TFS reviews

3,367 Views
909 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Adaptavist Test Management ...

TFS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

TFS and Adaptavist Test Management for Jira are leading tools in test management. User reviews indicate that Adaptavist Test Management for Jira has a stronger feature set, while TFS excels in deployment and customer service.

Features: TFS offers robust capabilities with good integration into development workflows, making it popular among users. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, however, is praised for its extensive functionality, seamless Jira integration, and user-friendly test creation processes. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is deemed superior due to its richer features.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest TFS could improve by enhancing its reporting capabilities and simplifying navigation. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira users call for better documentation and more intuitive setup processes. Both products need improvements, but the nature of suggested improvements varies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TFS is highlighted for its straightforward deployment and comprehensive customer support, making it a strong choice for teams seeking reliable assistance. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira also provides good deployment practices but receives mixed feedback on customer support responsiveness. TFS leads in this area due to consistent positive feedback on customer service.

Pricing and ROI: TFS is deemed cost-effective by users, offering substantial value for its pricing. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira, while pricier, delivers high ROI through its advanced features. Users find the higher cost justified by enhanced functionality. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira might be a better investment for those focusing on feature depth, even at a higher price point.

To learn more, read our detailed Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. TFS Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. TFS

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

11th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TFS

Ranking in Test Management Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is 2.5%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TFS is 5.0%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
TFS	5.0%
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira	2.5%
Other	92.5%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Ramakanta Sahu

Director of Product at Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

Has dashboard and reporting features that help us identify and address red flags

I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable. One challenge with integrating Adaptavist Test Management for Jira into workflows is ensuring it accurately tags and incorporates all relevant stories and epics. Sometimes, it’s unclear if the tool considers all dependencies and backlog items, which can affect how risks are assessed. However, it sometimes seems to miss this high-level perspective, which can be a limitation based on how the product is designed. This has been a concern for those who use it regularly, although I don’t manage these aspects personally.

Read full review

Parvez Shaikh

Service delivery manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Ensures team collaboration with strong version control but could improve testing capabilities

Version control is the most basic feature in TFS. It has been there since the beginning. We use it primarily for that purpose. Basically ensuring that the code is not overwritten by other team members and maintaining the sanctity of the code. Bringing order to a disparate team which is virtual at different locations is very important, and TFS provides that control. Once you update a code, nobody can modify it until you are done working on it and check in. It is a great product that revolutionized the way teams work together on Microsoft pieces of code. The versioning part has unique features and capabilities which are unmatched with other products out there.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a scalable solution."

"We don't use technical support. We have an office in Austria that provides us with solutions. Also, this solution is pretty simple and user-friendly. We don't really need help with it."

"The program is very stable and scalable."

"You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."

"Our software development process primarily uses Adaptive Test Management for Jira to monitor real-time risks across all stories and sprint planning. Additionally, we use it to create action plans for high-priority risks."

"The most valuable feature is integration, particularly if you have a .NET application."

"For what I need TFS for, I have never run into any limitation."

"Work item management integration with source control."

"The most valuable features of TFS are the test plans. We can reproduce reusable test plans in test automation. We have a lot of queries and this feature is very useful."

"Some of the valuable features are version control and the ability to create different collections in terms of segregating the authorization for teams who connect to small projects."

"It has great functionality: work items, backlogs, source code, build releases, and it's easy to use."

"It's an integrated system that includes all the information that we need to deliver our products smoothly and to track the progress of each piece of code."

"The most valuable features are the dashboard and task-selection capability."

More TFS pros

Cons

"I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr is take about 5-10 minutes."

"They should work on integrating the solution with AI."

"Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms."

"I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable."

"It would be better if we could bring it out on the cloud."

"One of the areas that could be improved is to have an effective full lifecycle management."

"The tool needs improvement in stability."

"Currently, we are looking for a solution with which we can incorporate third-party development sites or third-party project teams into the system. Because it is on-premise, it is a bit problematic because we need to have a VPN or something else in the system. A cloud-based solution would be better for us, and that's what we are looking for. Our biggest problem is the external connection, which, of course, is limited by our own IT. It would be good to have some kind of publishing service for this external connection. It might be there, and it might be that our IT is making it impossible for us. Its template editor could be easier to use. Currently, customizing the project templates according to your needs requires some work."

"The test management interface is not very handy."

"This solution is quite old and it is already being bundled as Azure DevOps Server."

"The user interface could be improved to make it simpler and increase usability."

"In the next release, I would like them to include integration for various projects, similar to what JIRA has, and they could create this feature on the dashboard."

More TFS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is a bit expensive, considering the kind of risk analysis and visibility we want, given that it's built on top of the Jira platform and other Atlassian products. It's priced slightly higher than similar products, maybe five to ten percent more."

"The licensing is rather expensive for those that have many users."

"You will need to obtain server and account licenses."

"It is pretty expensive compared to other project management tools."

"It is an expensive solution."

"TFS is not cheap."

"There is a yearly licensing fee that needs to be paid."

"The pricing is reasonable at this time."

"I wouldn't say that this tool is cheap or expensive but in the middle."

"I am not in a position to comment on the licensing terms, as we are talking about an enterprise arrangement."

More TFS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

34%

Computer Software Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?

The tool's pricing is a bit expensive, considering the kind of risk analysis and visibility we want, given that it's built on top of the Jira platform and other Atlassian products. It's priced slig...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?

I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.

See all answers

Which is better - TFS or Azure DevOps?

TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very fri...

See all answers

What do you like most about TFS?

Microsoft's technical team is supportive.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TFS?

While I do not know the exact pricing, TFS is likely more expensive than GitLab.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText DevPartner vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 26% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 26% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 20% of the time

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 17% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 12% of the time

More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Competitors

Jira vs TFS

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs TFS

Compared 17% of the time

TestRail vs TFS

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs TFS

Compared 4% of the time

Polarion ALM vs TFS

Compared 4% of the time

More TFS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

January 2026

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira report

Download Adaptavist Test Management for Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

TFS

January 2026

Download TFS product report

Also Known As

No data available

Team Foundation Server

Overview

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is the full, featured, enterprise ready test management solution directly in Jira. It offers full traceability across issues, requirements, test cases, and execution. The tool allows for flexibility and customisation for test plans and runs. It offers a free and flexible REST API, includes the ability to automate bulk tests, and enables seamless integration with most continuous integration tools. The in-depth reporting capability gives users the ability to analyse and share test data results between development and business teams. It’s the single source of truth to track, manage and optimise your whole test lifecycle right inside Jira software.

Try it now https://marketplace.atlassian....

See the overview video

Benefits:

Drive reusability across Jira with cross-project hierarchical repositories for all test assets
Improve collaboration with flexible workflows between traditional and Agile development teams
Enhance coverage with end-to-end traceability across all test artifacts
Eliminate duplication to increase efficiency with versioning, test data parameters and shared step features
Improve visibility and functionality with 70 cross-project reports and gadgets
Reduce management time and effort, with rich APIs for integration with test automation and DevOps tools
Allows teams to seamlessly collaborate and manage multiple versions of test cases in parallel while providing an audit history of changes

Features:

Easy drag and drop organisation, planning and execution
Hierarchical folders to manage and reuse assets across Jira projects, releases and sprints
Test case libraries including versioning, shared steps and test data parameters
Test plans and runs to manage and track test execution cycles
Full traceability of test cases, requirements, test execution results and defects
70 cross-project reports, gadgets and Confluence Macros to track the coverage of your tests with advanced cross project reporting
Global and project level settings for customisation and standardisation
Custom fields for test cases, test steps, test plans and test runs
Migration function to import test cases from files or legacy test management tools
REST APIs for integration with test automation and DevOp tools

Use Cases:

Integrate CI tools such as Jenkins, Bamboo, Travis CI or other development applications like Github, Bitbucket, Datadog via the REST API for end-to-end integration across test case management, execution, and reporting
Automate testing at scale, whilst maintaining traceability inside Jira. Scaled to 10,000+ tests across multiple configurations, publishing results in Jira in under 30 minutes
Increase efficiency by significantly reducing time spent on test case specification and management
Benefit from reusability across Jira projects and single points of maintenance when reusing and organizing test cases
Improved visibility of software testing process and quality with 70 out-of-the-box reports, including real-time dashboards
Clear end-to-end traceability of requirements, tests, and defects ensuring that the delivered software meets requirements.

Adaptavist

Visual Studio’s Team Foundation Server (TFS) is a powerful application development lifecycle management solution. It aids developers in managing every aspect of their DevOps and application creation. TFS combines many different types of solutions into a single powerful platform.

Visual Studio TFS Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy TFS include:

Build automation. TFS enables users to create definitions that can easily automate any and all tasks that are critical to the development of their applications. Businesses can utilize features that are built into TFS to accomplish preset tasks that can help them create the application of their choice. This can include enabling them to run automated tests when the need arises. Additionally, users can create custom tasks that will run automatically and allow users to focus their attention on the areas that most demand their focus.

Security. TFS is designed with the security of a user’s DevOps in mind. It enables an organization to restrict user permissions so that only developers that are meant to have access to particular parts of the development process can perform tasks related to those sections. It segments the development process to reduce the possibility of sensitive data being stolen.

Enables product rollbacks. TFS keeps copies of past versions of the organization’s application. Users can sift through the different versions that are available and can redeploy the version that best fits their needs should it ever become necessary to do so.

Visual Studio TFS Features

Source code management. TFS comes with all of the tools that developers need to completely manage their source code. They can share their code so that multiple developers can work on the same project. Additionally, TFS enables them to do things like review the history of a particular piece of source code.
Project management. Organizations can leverage the wealth of project management features that TFS offers and ensure that their projects run as smoothly as possible. Project managers are able to use TFS to control every aspect of their project, from the planning stage until the application’s development has reached its conclusion.

Reporting. TFS enables users to generate reports that leverage critical metrics and provide them with important insights into the applications that they are creating. These comprehensive reports can be secured so that only users with the proper level of clearance can access them.

Reviews from Real Users

TFS is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its source code management capabilities and its powerful integration suite.

Carl B., the vice president of engineering at Vertex Downhole Ltd, writes, “The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together.”

Ashish K., the principal consultant at Wipro, says, “I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well.”

Microsoft

Sample Customers

IBM, John Lewis, Trip Advisor, Netgear, Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Sapient

Vendex KBB IT Services, Info Support, Fujitsu Consulting, TCSC, Airways New Zealand, HP

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. TFS

December 2025

Free Report: Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. TFS

Find out what your peers are saying about Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. TFS and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. TFS report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.