Acunetix vs GitHub Advanced Security comparison

Invicti and GitHub are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Invicti is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3, while GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7. Invicti holds a 2.9% mindshare in AS, compared to GitHub’s 8.7% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Acunetix

Read 33 Acunetix reviews

6,393 Views
3,069 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

GitHub Advanced Security

Read 10 GitHub Advanced Security reviews

7,248 Views
7,248 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Acunetix

GitHub Advanced Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Acunetix and GitHub Advanced Security are leading competitors in the security and code analysis domain. GitHub Advanced Security has the upper hand in integration and efficiency, making it a preferable choice for developers while Acunetix remains strong in vulnerability scanning.

Features: Acunetix features comprehensive vulnerability scanning, detailed reporting, and ease of scanning. GitHub Advanced Security offers robust code analysis, seamless integration, and direct links to coding environments.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix can improve integration with development environments, offer smoother integrations, and provide more extensive support options. GitHub Advanced Security needs a less complex setup process, better documentation, and enhanced deployment ease.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix is praised for straightforward deployment but needs more comprehensive support. GitHub Advanced Security presents hurdles in deployment but benefits from integrated support services within its ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix is seen as cost-effective with competitive pricing and good ROI. GitHub Advanced Security, though pricier, delivers sufficient value through its features, making it worthwhile for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. GitHub Advanced Security Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. GitHub Advanced Security

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 863,429 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Acunetix

Ranking in Application Security Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (13th), Vulnerability Management (22nd), DevSecOps (6th)

GitHub Advanced Security

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Acunetix is 2.9%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Advanced Security is 8.7%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

KashifJamil

CEO at Xcelliti

Has enabled teams to improve security testing with smooth integration and high accuracy

Acunetix has a very good ratio of fewer false positives, so users don't need to retest everything. Acunetix operates smoothly with no interruptions required, and it performs at 100% efficiency without issues in scanning anything. The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Acunetix integrates with every type of tool, including CI/CD tools, offering 100% integration in DevOps environments. The main benefit of Acunetix is that at the first level, users can address security issues related to penetration testing, allowing them to expose vulnerabilities and ensure all required testing is completed with very few false positives.

Read full review

Sabna Sainudeen

Director, Application Security at Carlsberg

Seamlessly integrates into developer environment for streamlined code scanning

GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner. There are features in GitHub Advanced Security that cannot be used within Microsoft, which is strange since they are the same company. It should also focus on developing a software bill of materials (SBOM) to see all open software used in one place.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Acunetix is the best service in the world. It is easy to manage. It gives a lot of information to the users to see and identify problems in their site or applications. It works very well."

"We use the solution for the scanning of vulnerabilities like SQL injections."

"The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities."

"The most important feature is that it's a web-based graphical user interface. That is a great addition. Also, the ability to schedule scans is great."

"It's very user-friendly for the testing teams. It's very easy for them to understand things and to fix vulnerabilities."

"We are able to create a report which shows the PCI DSS scoring and share it with the application teams. Then, they can correlate and see exactly what they need to fix, and why."

"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

More Acunetix pros

"GitHub Advanced Security uses artificial intelligence in the backend, specifically CodeQL, to analyze code and provide fewer but more reliable findings, so there are less false positives."

"The most valuable is the developer experience and the extensibility of the overall ecosystem."

"The product's most valuable features are security scan, dependency scan, and cost-effectiveness."

"Dependency scanning is a valuable feature."

"I have not experienced any performance or stability issues with GitHub Advanced Security."

"GitHub Advanced Security is ten out of ten scalable."

"GitHub provides advanced security, which is why the customers choose this tool; it allows them to rely solely on GitHub as one platform for everything they need."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part."

More GitHub Advanced Security pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the pricing."

"The vulnerability identification speed should be improved."

"The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans."

"The solution can be improved by adding the ability to scan subdomains automatically, and by providing reports that can be exported to external databases to share with other solutions."

"There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better."

"Currently only supports web scanning."

"The jargon used makes it difficult for project managers to understand the issues, and the technical explanations used make it difficult for developers to understand issues. These things should be simplified much more. That would be very helpful for us when explaining to them what needs to be fixed. The report output needs to be simplified."

"There was an issue related to updates from the internet."

More Acunetix cons

"For GitHub Advanced Security, I would like to see more support for various programming languages."

"The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."

"The report limitations are the main issue."

"GitHub Advanced Security should look into API security issues, which they currently do not. Additionally, open-source security vulnerabilities are not getting updated in a timely manner."

"There could be DST features included in the product."

"A more refined approach, categorizing and emphasizing specific vulnerabilities, would be beneficial."

"The customizations are a little bit difficult."

"Maybe make it compatible with more programming languages. Have a customized ruleset where the end-user can create their own rules for scanning."

More GitHub Advanced Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced."

"The solution is expensive."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"The solution is expensive."

"The current licensing model, which relies on active commitments, poses challenges, particularly in predicting and managing growth."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

863,429 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Most of the customers who use Acunetix are looking for security testing. The primary use case is performing penetration testing. The main use cases include vulnerability scanning, security testing,...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

Acunetix supports multi-user environments effectively. Acunetix is targeted for small to mid-size teams in a DevSecOps environment, making it the best choice for small and mid-size companies, offer...

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub Advanced Security?

It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Advanced Security?

The reporting feature might need improvement. While it integrates seamlessly with my workflow, it doesn't provide management with oversight, such as statistics and the number of vulnerabilities. Ma...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GitHub Advanced Security?

I use GitHub Advanced Security for conducting source code security scanning for the software that I develop.

See all answers

Comparisons

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 17% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 11% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 9% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Acunetix

Compared 6% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 46% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 21% of the time

Veracode vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub Advanced Security

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Advanced Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

July 2025

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Advanced Security

July 2025

Download GitHub Advanced Security product report

Also Known As

AcuSensor

No data available

Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

GitHub Advanced Security secures data by scanning for vulnerabilities in dependencies, secret scanning, and protecting sensitive information. It integrates seamlessly, reducing reliance on multiple tools and optimizing vulnerability detection.

GitHub Advanced Security is designed to enhance security awareness by offering comprehensive tools for secret scanning, code analysis, and SCSS dependency checks. AI-driven features deliver accurate security insights while minimizing false positives. It provides valuable integration with Azure DevOps, maintaining control within dashboards and enabling external systems' support through APIs. With CodeQL, users can perform custom queries across projects. Propelled by Microsoft, the platform enhances operational frameworks with essential security features, although improvements are needed in dashboard consolidation, reporting, and integration mechanisms. Users seek better customizability, language support, and training resources to ensure smoother implementation.

What are the key features of GitHub Advanced Security?

Security and Dependency Scanning: Identifies vulnerabilities in code and dependencies.
Secret Scanning: Detects sensitive information exposure.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces the need for multiple security tools.
Developer Experience: Integrates seamlessly with development environments.
Extensibility: Custom queries via CodeQL and integration support.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Enhanced visibility reduces risk.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes with fewer tools.
Actionable Insights: AI-driven analysis provides clear guidance.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates team integration through shared dashboards.

Industries implement GitHub Advanced Security to maintain robust security standards. It is favored by technology sectors seeking seamless integration with Azure DevOps and looking for customizable security tools tailored to project needs. Financial institutions value its accurate threat detection and compliance support, while enterprises focus on its comprehensive dependency scanning and code analysis capabilities to safeguard critical assets. The adaptability of GitHub Advanced Security across different operational environments illustrates its practical benefits.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. GitHub Advanced Security

July 2025

Free Report: Acunetix vs. GitHub Advanced Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. GitHub Advanced Security and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

863,429 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. GitHub Advanced Security report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.