We performed a comparison between Acronis Disaster Recovery and Azure Site Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Performance-wise, it works efficiently for backup and recovery compared to other tools."
"Our customers use Acronis Disaster Recovery for data backup."
"Acronis Disaster Recovery has good scalability."
"Patch management, backup, and disaster recovery have been the solution's most valuable features for our data protection strategy."
"One key feature is it encrypts your data at rest which is really good."
"The solution can be improved by including a load balancer."
"The most valuable features of the product for me are its backup and recovery functionalities."
"The backup and recovery options work flawlessly."
"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."
"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."
"It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."
"We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."
"What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution."
"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."
"Provides generally good performance, from protection to production to failover to data recovery."
"I wish the Disaster Recovery system could do more, like integrating irregularity features and combining VLP functionalities."
"The product should improve compute points."
"They could provide pricing models considering the requirements of various countries and organizations."
"The documentation can be improved, this would have helped."
"The solution covers specific versions of Windows and Linux, and it would be good if other Linux versions or some special appliances could work in the Acronis Disaster Recovery environment."
"In the future, I would like to see cross-platform support."
"Acronis Disaster Recovery should provide software information wherein I can change my setup to collect more information."
"The cost is acceptable."
"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."
"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."
"I would like to see more security features."
"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."
"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."
Acronis Disaster Recovery is ranked 18th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 10 reviews while Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews. Acronis Disaster Recovery is rated 8.4, while Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Acronis Disaster Recovery writes "Easy to implement and provides good features like patch management and disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". Acronis Disaster Recovery is most compared with Arcserve UDP and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and NAKIVO Backup & Replication. See our Acronis Disaster Recovery vs. Azure Site Recovery report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
