Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

What is Apica?

Get the report
Helped 867,341 peers since 2012

Featured Apica reviews

Apica mindshare

As of September 2025, the mindshare of Apica in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category stands at 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Apica0.4%
Dynatrace8.8%
Datadog7.2%
Other83.6%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

PeerResearch reports based on Apica reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Performance Monitoring (APM) and ObservabilitySep 13, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersSep 13, 2025Download
ComparisonApica vs DatadogSep 13, 2025Download
ComparisonApica vs DynatraceSep 13, 2025Download
ComparisonApica vs Splunk AppDynamicsSep 13, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Dynatrace4.48.8%95%350 interviewsAdd to research
Datadog4.37.2%97%188 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business32
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise83
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Media Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Retailer
7%
Insurance Company
6%
Computer Software Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Manufacturing Company
3%
Construction Company
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
Agriculture
2%
University
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Government
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Logistics Company
1%

Compare Apica with alternative products

Learn more about Apica

Apica customers

Related questions

 
Apica Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys4.0I use Apica for automation and continuous monitoring of applications. It offers easy script creation with drag-and-drop options and effective real-time monitoring. However, ZebraTester needs improvement due to its complexity and lack of documentation.
Test Automation Specialist -Full Stack at IBM3.0I use Apica for performance and automation testing, appreciating its ease in recording APIs and enhancing scripts. Although it requires other tools for endurance testing and uses an outdated scripting language, Apica handles complex flows and file uploads efficiently.
Senior Associate Vice President at Wells Fargo4.5I find Apica valuable for validating content and performing login functionalities in applications, with its ability to record front-end checks. However, it requires a robust ID management system for tasks needing proper human IDs, especially in HR functions.
Performance Tester at MetLife3.5I use Apica for developing UI scripts and API tests. I value the automatic backend handling, easy setup, and results presentation. However, it's not very user-friendly and could improve in request/response details and header correlation. Previously, I used LoadRunner and JMeter.
QA Automation Engineer at Good Work Hub3.0I used Apica for load testing during a project shift from London to Africa. Despite being newer and less advanced than LoadRunner, its scripting ease and responsive development team made it beneficial, although initially challenging due to its early development stage.
Head of Systems and Infrastructure at Booming Games4.5I worked with Betsson, using Apica to monitor brands and simulate user experiences. Its key features include browser simulation, custom scripting, and location-based monitoring. It's easy to use and cloud-based, but needs more integrations and location checks.
Application performance tester at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees4.5I've been using Apica for performance testing, appreciating its user-friendly interface which doesn't require scripting knowledge. However, it's costly and lacks mobile application testing capabilities, focusing only on APIs and applications.
Senior Performance Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees4.0I used Apica for performance testing in my last project, appreciating its load generation capabilities and ability to capture requests and responses. However, unlike LoadRunner, it lacks automatic correlation features, making initial scripting somewhat challenging.