Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Graylog Enterprise Logo

Graylog Enterprise Reviews

Vendor: Graylog
4.0 out of 5

What is Graylog Enterprise?

Featured Graylog Enterprise reviews

Graylog Enterprise mindshare

As of October 2025, the mindshare of Graylog Enterprise in the Log Management category stands at 6.0%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Graylog Enterprise6.0%
Wazuh12.2%
Grafana Loki7.9%
Other73.9%
Log Management

PeerResearch reports based on Graylog Enterprise reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryLog ManagementOct 4, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersOct 4, 2025Download
ComparisonGraylog Enterprise vs WazuhOct 4, 2025Download
ComparisonGraylog Enterprise vs Splunk Enterprise SecurityOct 4, 2025Download
ComparisonGraylog Enterprise vs Grafana LokiOct 4, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Wazuh3.712.2%80%49 interviewsAdd to research
Dynatrace4.44.9%95%350 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business396
Midsize Enterprise206
Large Enterprise611
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
10%
University
8%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Retailer
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
Media Company
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Non Profit
2%
Construction Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%

Compare Graylog Enterprise with alternative products

Learn more about Graylog Enterprise

Graylog Enterprise customers

Related questions

 
Graylog Enterprise Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Head of Cyber Security & CTO at a tech services company with 51-200 employees3.5We use Graylog for event correlation and IT security, valuing its open search-based integration and alert capabilities. While needing improved integrations, it significantly saves time. Before switching, we considered other solutions like IBM QRadar but Graylog's scalability and reliability prevailed.
Security Analyst at Netsharqs cybersecurity GmbH3.5I primarily use Graylog for log management and visualization, appreciating its log enrichment features, particularly data adapters and caching abilities. However, configuring processing pipelines can be tedious due to limited documentation and reliance on regular expressions for parsing.
DevOps Engineer at Proton Technologies4.0I find Graylog ideal for backend services due to its real-time updates and fast message streaming. It bridges technical knowledge for non-technical teams and outperforms tools like OpenSearch with its intuitive interface, although it could improve in user interface customization.
Security Officer at BC Energbank S.A.3.0As a bank, we utilize Graylog for log collection from multiple sources. Although it's free, the setup is complex. Compared to IBM QRadar, which we now use, Graylog lacks interactivity, user-friendliness, and efficient alert creation.
Senior Data Architect at a non-tech company with 201-500 employees4.5No summary available
Sr. DevOps Engineer at TechStyle Fashion Group3.5No summary available
Software Engineer & Co-Founder at Plexify GmbH4.0No summary available
DevOps Engineer Intern at MyKaarma3.5We are using Graylog to store and monitor logs for system errors. The new interface enhances performance, but the removal of the legacy alarm callback feature and lack of SSO integration and auto-scaling in the community version need improvement.