AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Reviews

Name: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery
Brand: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Rating: 3.9 (17 reviews)

3.9 out of 5

17 reviews
88% willing to recommend

What is AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery?

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Get the AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, Veeam Data Platform, Commvault Cloud and more!

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is the #16 ranked solution in top Disaster Recovery Software, #18 ranked solution in top Cloud Backup solutions, and #25 ranked solution in best Backup and Recovery Software. PeerSpot users give AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is most commonly compared to Veeam Data Platform: AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Veeam Data Platform. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 57% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 12% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

August 2025

Get the report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Featured AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reviews

Vijay Londhe

Assistant Programmer at Mahadis

Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status. I have to calculate whether my data is replicated to the Adarabad region or not. These features, if available in AWS, would be beneficial.

Read full review

Olusegun Akinnola

DevOps Engineer at DivVerse Labs

In its current state, ECL integrates with CloudWatch for basic logging and monitoring, yet improvements could include more detailed logs for specific actions, like when I perform actions such as push or pull. This would detail user activity directly in the ACL console for easier debugging and auditing. Additionally, an improved AWS pricing model is needed. AWS charges for storage and data transfer, which can add up, especially with large images or frequent pulls. Improvement should focus on offering more storage or better volume discounts for long-term use. It would also be beneficial to allow free pulls within the AWS account and vision. Moreover, image scanning for vulnerabilities can sometimes be slow, especially for large images. Speeding up the scanning process or providing optimized scanning for critical workflows would be welcome advancements.

Read full review

Duy AnhMai

Product Owner at Heineken

We are using AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery for backup purposes in our company AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is convenient because it is cloud-based technology. The strong points are the stability and scalability of the solution, as well as the convenience of it being cloud-based. The cost of…

Read full review

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery mindshare

Product category:

As of August 2025, the mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category stands at 1.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

PeerResearch reports based on AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Disaster Recovery (DR) Software	Aug 18, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Aug 18, 2025	Download
Comparison	AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Veeam Data Platform	Aug 18, 2025	Download
Comparison	AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software	Aug 18, 2025	Download
Comparison	AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs VMware Live Recovery	Aug 18, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Veeam Data Platform	4.3	21.6%	94%	428 interviews Add to research
Commvault Cloud	4.3	13.3%	95%	111 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers valuable features like database replication, seamless integration, automated orchestration, and instant block verification. Its cost-effectiveness, ease of use, and scalability are highlighted. Users appreciate the native service's stability, reliability, and managed infrastructure, reducing management time. Seamless integration with AWS services like Route 53 enhances disaster recovery. Pay-as-you-go pricing is advantageous when conducting disaster recovery drills, offering flexibility and reducing potential security breaches compared to competitors.

"I appreciate the automated orchestration of recovery processes in this solution, especially integration with Route 53 and automatically using Route 53 to switch to a different region directly."
"What I like about ECR AWS is that it is a fully managed service, so I don't need to manage the underlying infrastructure or worry about scalability in AWS concerning building, maintenance, security, and high availability."
"It offers seamless integration with services like ACL, EKS, and Fargate for deploying containerized applications."

Room for Improvement

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery requires improved automation and enhanced logging for easier diagnostics. Users face difficulties with archival processes and require more intuitive failback functionality. Customer support and UI could be better. Costs are perceived as high, and more AI-driven automation with security features would be beneficial. Reducing failover and failback time, streamlining data replication, and providing comprehensive network configuration tools could enhance overall user satisfaction.

"In its current state, ECL integrates with CloudWatch for basic logging and monitoring, yet improvements could include more detailed logs for specific actions, like when I perform actions such as push or pull."
"An improved AWS pricing model is needed."
"Since I have to view everything on the console, the previous application solutions like IBM and Sanavi showed the RPO and RTO status directly. In AWS Disaster Recovery Service, these details are not available, making it difficult to check my replication status."

ROI

Users report a high ROI from AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery. It helps save significant amounts by eliminating the need for hardware purchases as businesses move to the cloud. While upfront costs are lower than building data centers, storage costs can be high for smaller users. The service enhances integration and supports various operating systems. It reduces downtime and data loss, aiding in maintaining company reputation and providing problem-solving capabilities during disasters.

Pricing

Enterprise users generally find AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery's pricing to be fair but can accumulate due to multiple costs, including CloudEndure licenses, AWS environment, and storage. Tier 2 pricing offers better value with less frequent replication. Long-term agreements often provide discounts but limit flexibility in adjusting serviceable licenses annually. The solution is perceived as expensive compared to alternatives, with pay-as-you-go models affecting total costs based on usage. Licensing is straightforward, often managed through third-party partners.

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."
"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations use AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery primarily for ensuring backup and recovery operations, facilitating disaster recovery procedures, and enabling data replication and protection across various environments. It assists with incidents like system outages, compliance issues, and potential data leaks. Many entities appreciate its block-level replication and compatibility with AWS infrastructure, although some find its effectiveness limited in multi-cloud environments. It plays a significant role in ensuring data integrity and satisfying audit requirements.

Service and Support

Customer service for AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is rated highly, with responsive management and technical support. Many appreciate quick responses and effective assistance, though some express a desire for a formal ticketing system. AWS enterprise-level support is especially beneficial, providing timely support. Users often find technical support helpful and issues are resolved promptly. While some manage issues independently, others team with third parties, finding the support experience generally positive and satisfying.

Deployment

Users found the initial setup of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery to be mostly easy and straightforward. Although some required third-party assistance, many managed on their own without difficulty. Complexity varied by environment, yet most found configuration manageable with a single person. One instance involved challenges rating setup difficulty very low, while others noted successful setups without issues. Most described the process as easy, not requiring extensive teams.

Scalability

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery consistently showcases seamless scalability, easily accommodating diverse needs with automatic processes. Many organizations rate its capability between nine and ten out of ten, acknowledging its effective handling for both small and large-scale environments. The platform's ability to manage extensive nodes without issues is highlighted, alongside efficient dashboard reporting features. Investments in capacity ensure it remains adaptable, and users affirm no problems with licensing or machine scalability.

Stability

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is mostly stable and reliable. Users note no frequent issues, stating it doesn't crash and has no glitches. There can be occasional server lag or bandwidth dependence, which may require action. Evaluation ratings range from eight to nine out of ten. Some users see potential for cost concern due to data replication, yet most find performance satisfactory, and it works well without major incidents.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.