(Full disclosure: I am Director of Product Marketing at a CTEM solution provider. I am not going to promote our solution in this answer. ) Thanks for this question. The answer is nuanced. Direct answer to direct question, a CTEM simply must consider risk context beyond generic measures of risk like CVSS. I would argue that CVSS itself was never intended to be a stopping point for risk assessment, but an opening statement. Yet, far too many processes and programs find themselves chasing CVSS severity in an SLA compliance-driven manner. You get the behavior you measure. However, recent data prove that CVSS Mediums are exploited more frequently than Criticals and Highs COMBINED. If the objective is better risk management, then generic severity measures and SLA compliance do not drive the intended result. If, however, a CTEM solution considers the factors unique to an IT organization's risk context - e.g., CVEs in runtime, internet exposure, asset criticality, and so on - that will be a monumental step forward for so many organizations looking to transform their vulnerability management program. I could go on, adding more nuanced considerations, but I fear the length of this reply has already exhausted the reader's indulgence. I am always eager to discuss open-mindedly. I am not hard to find on LinkedIn.
Search for a product comparison in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
To effectively evaluate CTEM solutions, focus on key features:
Real-time threat detection
Comprehensive threat intelligence integration
Scalability and adaptability
Automated responses and remediation
Robust reporting and analytics capabilities
Cross-platform compatibility
Real-time threat detection is crucial for CTEM, ensuring immediate identification of vulnerabilities and threats. The ability to integrate comprehensive threat intelligence is vital for organizations to stay ahead of evolving risks. Scalability in CTEM solutions ensures they can grow with organizational demands, adapting as cybersecurity landscapes change.
Automated responses and remediation capabilities streamline incident management, minimizing manual intervention. Robust reporting and analytics offer insights into threat patterns and security posture, vital for informed decision-making. Cross-platform compatibility facilitates seamless integration across diverse IT environments, ensuring consistent protection.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cymulate, Zafran Security, XM Cyber and others in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM). Updated: June 2025.
CTEM enables proactive security measures by continuously identifying and analyzing potential threats and vulnerabilities within an organization's digital ecosystem.
This approach to security management offers a comprehensive way to monitor and address threats efficiently. Leveraging advanced analytics and real-time data, it supports informed decision-making, enhancing an organization's ability to manage risks and security breaches before they escalate.
What are the critical features of CTEM...
(Full disclosure: I am Director of Product Marketing at a CTEM solution provider. I am not going to promote our solution in this answer. ) Thanks for this question. The answer is nuanced. Direct answer to direct question, a CTEM simply must consider risk context beyond generic measures of risk like CVSS. I would argue that CVSS itself was never intended to be a stopping point for risk assessment, but an opening statement. Yet, far too many processes and programs find themselves chasing CVSS severity in an SLA compliance-driven manner. You get the behavior you measure. However, recent data prove that CVSS Mediums are exploited more frequently than Criticals and Highs COMBINED. If the objective is better risk management, then generic severity measures and SLA compliance do not drive the intended result. If, however, a CTEM solution considers the factors unique to an IT organization's risk context - e.g., CVEs in runtime, internet exposure, asset criticality, and so on - that will be a monumental step forward for so many organizations looking to transform their vulnerability management program. I could go on, adding more nuanced considerations, but I fear the length of this reply has already exhausted the reader's indulgence. I am always eager to discuss open-mindedly. I am not hard to find on LinkedIn.
To effectively evaluate CTEM solutions, focus on key features:
Real-time threat detection is crucial for CTEM, ensuring immediate identification of vulnerabilities and threats. The ability to integrate comprehensive threat intelligence is vital for organizations to stay ahead of evolving risks. Scalability in CTEM solutions ensures they can grow with organizational demands, adapting as cybersecurity landscapes change.
Automated responses and remediation capabilities streamline incident management, minimizing manual intervention. Robust reporting and analytics offer insights into threat patterns and security posture, vital for informed decision-making. Cross-platform compatibility facilitates seamless integration across diverse IT environments, ensuring consistent protection.