I'm still working with these products intermittently as a consultant. Currently, I'm dealing with different cloud technologies, not really AWS. I'm currently working with legacy systems. The solutions from Oracle that I'm dealing with include just the database, as I'm doing some performance tuning on Oracle, both on-premises and on cloud. Regarding Oracle Database, I'm working with on-premise and an Oracle instance running on Azure, Microsoft, not Oracle Cloud Services. I use IntelliJ from JetBrains as my Java IDE almost daily. IntelliJ is my main product, and I use PyCharm when programming in Python. The best features in the product are its integrated nature. Understanding IntelliJ for Java makes switching to PyCharm seamless due to the familiar IDE facilities. I have integrated PyCharm with version control systems such as Git and GitHub. On a scale of 1-10, I rate PyCharm a 9.
PyCharm has an excellent user experience, and I appreciate its cross-platform capabilities. The code completion has become more intelligent over the years. I rate PyCharm a nine.
If you're interested in using PyCharm, I'd advise you to watch a video tutorial to learn how to fully take advantage of its features. I recently discovered many useful features I wish I had known about earlier, which could have enhanced my productivity. JetBrains also sends newsletters with updates, which can be helpful. While it can be time-consuming to explore all the features, it's often worth it because some features are incredibly useful. I'd rate PyCharm an eight out of ten. Two points are deducted because it's quite heavy on system resources, which can be a drawback for regular use. Second, many useful features are hidden, requiring users to be curious to explore them.
Senior Project Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2023-01-20T11:28:09Z
Jan 20, 2023
The main difference between PyCharm and competitor products lies in their features. PyCharm's features are specifically designed for Python programming, while its competitor products are typically more generic since they are designed for multiple languages. Rafael: I would rate PyCharm an eight out of ten.
The solution has a good reputation in the development community because it is very easy to use for creating software. College students who want to build quickly should use the solution. Many tutorials and online resources are available for ongoing learning. I rate the solution a ten out of ten because it has always been very convenient to use, is easy to understand, and surely increases the effectiveness of software development.
Static Code Analysis offers an automated method to detect code defects early in the development process. It improves code quality by ensuring compliance with coding standards and is essential for maintaining reliable software.Static Code Analysis tools evaluate source code without executing it, identifying potential vulnerabilities, bugs, and non-compliance issues. These tools help developers address technical debt by finding issues that might lead to software failures if left unresolved....
I'm still working with these products intermittently as a consultant. Currently, I'm dealing with different cloud technologies, not really AWS. I'm currently working with legacy systems. The solutions from Oracle that I'm dealing with include just the database, as I'm doing some performance tuning on Oracle, both on-premises and on cloud. Regarding Oracle Database, I'm working with on-premise and an Oracle instance running on Azure, Microsoft, not Oracle Cloud Services. I use IntelliJ from JetBrains as my Java IDE almost daily. IntelliJ is my main product, and I use PyCharm when programming in Python. The best features in the product are its integrated nature. Understanding IntelliJ for Java makes switching to PyCharm seamless due to the familiar IDE facilities. I have integrated PyCharm with version control systems such as Git and GitHub. On a scale of 1-10, I rate PyCharm a 9.
PyCharm has an excellent user experience, and I appreciate its cross-platform capabilities. The code completion has become more intelligent over the years. I rate PyCharm a nine.
I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten.
If you're interested in using PyCharm, I'd advise you to watch a video tutorial to learn how to fully take advantage of its features. I recently discovered many useful features I wish I had known about earlier, which could have enhanced my productivity. JetBrains also sends newsletters with updates, which can be helpful. While it can be time-consuming to explore all the features, it's often worth it because some features are incredibly useful. I'd rate PyCharm an eight out of ten. Two points are deducted because it's quite heavy on system resources, which can be a drawback for regular use. Second, many useful features are hidden, requiring users to be curious to explore them.
I would rate PyCharm at seven, and I would recommend it to beginners or those starting with Python programming for its ease of use.
Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
It's a good product. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I rate PyCharm a nine out of ten.
The main difference between PyCharm and competitor products lies in their features. PyCharm's features are specifically designed for Python programming, while its competitor products are typically more generic since they are designed for multiple languages. Rafael: I would rate PyCharm an eight out of ten.
The solution has a good reputation in the development community because it is very easy to use for creating software. College students who want to build quickly should use the solution. Many tutorials and online resources are available for ongoing learning. I rate the solution a ten out of ten because it has always been very convenient to use, is easy to understand, and surely increases the effectiveness of software development.
I would highly recommend it. I would rate it a nine out of 10.
This is a good solution and I recommend it. I rate PyCharm nine out of 10.