Senior Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
2023-12-12T17:12:26Z
Dec 12, 2023
My use cases are not complex. I have heard friends say that the product is flexible. It can be provisioned on different networks. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.
It's critical for the partner or system integrator to have experienced people who can do lab replications and other preparation before going to the customer and doing a Proof of Concept (POC). It's challenging to have MX960 chassis at the partner level, but if you can arrange it, it's the best way to demonstrate all the features to the customer. Secondly, the person doing the POC should be knowledgeable about the product. Once, during a POC for subscriber management, the competing vendors didn't have subject matter experts to come in and assist. Therefore, the initial POC wasn't very good. So, my advice is to train your people and train the customer. Everyone knows Cisco and must of local and private Academies training cisco , but Juniper-specific training is only available at the Juniper Portal or requires the customer to purchase it and price are high. People can get free training from juniper portal which is free now days with discounted vouchers for in certification track, this will help the Juniper to aware about products and syntax. It's a universal flagship product and my favorite, so I would rate it a ten out of ten. However, everything has its limitations.
I would recommend it. Compared to Cisco, for example, about pricing, Juniper is a bit cheaper. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. Because all the projects that we worked on were quite complex. So, scaling, Juniper could use some switches before the MX series, and it's quite scalable. We can do everything that we want, especially in big platforms
Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 10
2023-07-27T13:15:34Z
Jul 27, 2023
I use the Juniper MX204 version. I would recommend Juniper MX Series Routers to other users. Overall, I rate Juniper MX Series Routers nine and a half out of ten.
I give Juniper MX Series Routers a nine out of ten. Integrating Juniper solutions into a non-Juniper environment is feasible. I recommend Juniper MX Series Routers.
It's a very good and reliable product. I would rate it eight out of ten. I can recommend it but not over the other routers in the market. We had a marvelous experience with it, but we don't have extensive experience with other vendors.
We're end-users. We are not using the latest version. We're using a version that is about six years old. I'd recommend the solution to others. I would rate the solution nine out of ten.
Infrastructure Expert and Architect at a non-profit with 11-50 employees
Real User
2022-06-21T06:03:00Z
Jun 21, 2022
I'm a customer and end-user. I'd recommend the solution. It's a good solution with good support. You can also find technology knowledge about the product on the internet. It's not very difficult to look up more details. You can find anything in the forums, for example. In Russia, these routers are popular, which makes it possible to ask some advice from engineers from other companies. They can share their experience which is important when you reconfigure devices. If it was in January, I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. However, right now, I'd rate it maybe eight out of ten since we don't have support in Russia any longer. Nobody can send you new details to change things if they're broken, for example.
YKB at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Real User
2022-06-15T18:55:00Z
Jun 15, 2022
I'm a customer and end-user. We always download the last update for this project, however, I don't remember the number of the update. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. It's easy to use, stable, and continuously improving.
Owner & CEO at a comms service provider with 1-10 employees
Real User
2021-07-28T08:43:00Z
Jul 28, 2021
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Juniper Enterprise Routers a 10. I would definitely recommend Juniper Enterprise Switches for users who want to integrate it.
Overall, this is a very good product. It is a very stable solution and I can recommend it. The only difficulty is that it is hard to set up. I would rate this solution and eight out of ten.
Overall, I find this to be a good product. The features are completely stable, customers are happy with their investment, although there is occasionally with the reliability of certain modules. I would rate this solution an nine out of ten.
Network Infrastructure Program Manager at a non-profit with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2020-03-19T13:00:00Z
Mar 19, 2020
Juniper is a leading company in MPLS technology and its equipment was one of the first ones that were ready for it. This is why juniper devices are often used by service providers, more so than Cisco devices. Juniper is one of the leaders in deploying the ISSU feature, although it now exists in Cisco and other solutions as well. Certain Juniper models can be used only for the routing tables, which is important because in some cases, the routing table size is one of the factors. My advice to anybody who is implementing this solution is to first have the proper training to help understand the product and all of its features. In most cases that I have seen, the company will order the device and are not aware of the features. They might have issues with sizing or getting the wrong product. Customers need to review the products in the context of their requirements and then build the high-level and low-level designs based on those requirements. Absolutely, you should not try to configure the device before completing the training because you need to take security into consideration. Overall, this is a good device. I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
Technical Account Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-03-09T08:07:58Z
Mar 9, 2020
I'm not sure which version of the solution we are using. It's not that I don't like the product, but I prefer the SDN solutions. It's a good product. My personal preference is for direct, however. Juniper solutions are very flexible and very good. They offer very good performance. I have no problems with them. I'd feel comfortable recommending the solution. Other companies should try it out. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
We are simply an integrator. We are advise clients about the product. We don't have a partnership directly with Juniper. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. They're a good solution to work with.
Juniper is very user-friendly, efficient, and we're very happy with it. I don't know if there are other vendors that have the same kind of service out there. We are very pleased with the performance of the Juniper router. The biggest I lesson I learned from using Juniper is never go back to Cisco. I would rate it a ten out of ten. We're very happy with the current functionality.
Network Operations Center Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2019-12-23T07:05:00Z
Dec 23, 2019
From my experience in the ISP world, I think that Juniper Enterprise Routers are very good products. I would recommend this solution for anybody who is looking to start small and scale up because I think that you can easily do that using Juniper products. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Network Infrastructure Program Manager at a non-profit with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2019-10-21T17:16:00Z
Oct 21, 2019
Juniper is a leading company in the MPLS technology, which is one of the reasons that they are used more often than Cisco by service providers. My advice to anybody who is implementing this device is to have the proper training, first. It should not be configured before the training is complete. Also, be sure to understand the product and the features that it has to offer. In most of the cases that I have seen, the company is not really aware of the features. This means that they might have sizing issues with the product and end up with the wrong one. The high-level and low-level design should be based on the actual requirements. Sometimes, adding services to the appliance is not what you want to do. You can use this router only for routing tables in some cases because, for service providers, the routing table size is one of the major factors. Whether it is Cisco, Juniper, Fortinet, or Palo Alto, you will see a reduction in throughput for every service that is added to the appliance. This is why proper design is so important. Overall, this is a good device. I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
Juniper MX Series Routers are a reliable and flexible which is primarily used for its router capabilities and as an execution router. It is commonly used in projects as a system integrator and for routing the network of universities. With features such as Layered VPNs, IPsec, VPLS, and firewall filters, the solution offers high protection and ease of use.
The routers are capable and scalable, and can be integrated as an event solution. The solution has helped organizations by serving as...
I would overall rate it 8 out of 10.
My use cases are not complex. I have heard friends say that the product is flexible. It can be provisioned on different networks. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.
It's critical for the partner or system integrator to have experienced people who can do lab replications and other preparation before going to the customer and doing a Proof of Concept (POC). It's challenging to have MX960 chassis at the partner level, but if you can arrange it, it's the best way to demonstrate all the features to the customer. Secondly, the person doing the POC should be knowledgeable about the product. Once, during a POC for subscriber management, the competing vendors didn't have subject matter experts to come in and assist. Therefore, the initial POC wasn't very good. So, my advice is to train your people and train the customer. Everyone knows Cisco and must of local and private Academies training cisco , but Juniper-specific training is only available at the Juniper Portal or requires the customer to purchase it and price are high. People can get free training from juniper portal which is free now days with discounted vouchers for in certification track, this will help the Juniper to aware about products and syntax. It's a universal flagship product and my favorite, so I would rate it a ten out of ten. However, everything has its limitations.
Overall, I would rate Juniper MX Series Routers as an eight out of ten.
Overall, I would rate Juniper MX Series Routers as a ten out of ten. It is an excellent solution.
I would recommend it. Compared to Cisco, for example, about pricing, Juniper is a bit cheaper. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. Because all the projects that we worked on were quite complex. So, scaling, Juniper could use some switches before the MX series, and it's quite scalable. We can do everything that we want, especially in big platforms
I would rate Juniper MX Series Routers a ten out of ten, they're first-class.
I use the Juniper MX204 version. I would recommend Juniper MX Series Routers to other users. Overall, I rate Juniper MX Series Routers nine and a half out of ten.
I give Juniper MX Series Routers a nine out of ten. Integrating Juniper solutions into a non-Juniper environment is feasible. I recommend Juniper MX Series Routers.
It's a very good and reliable product. I would rate it eight out of ten. I can recommend it but not over the other routers in the market. We had a marvelous experience with it, but we don't have extensive experience with other vendors.
We're end-users. We are not using the latest version. We're using a version that is about six years old. I'd recommend the solution to others. I would rate the solution nine out of ten.
I rate this solution a ten out of ten, and I recommend it to others.
I'm a customer and end-user. I'd recommend the solution. It's a good solution with good support. You can also find technology knowledge about the product on the internet. It's not very difficult to look up more details. You can find anything in the forums, for example. In Russia, these routers are popular, which makes it possible to ask some advice from engineers from other companies. They can share their experience which is important when you reconfigure devices. If it was in January, I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. However, right now, I'd rate it maybe eight out of ten since we don't have support in Russia any longer. Nobody can send you new details to change things if they're broken, for example.
I'm a customer and end-user. We always download the last update for this project, however, I don't remember the number of the update. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. It's easy to use, stable, and continuously improving.
I rate Juniper Enterprise Routers a nine out of ten.
I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Juniper Enterprise Routers a seven out of ten.
I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Juniper Enterprise Routers an eight out of ten.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Juniper Enterprise Routers a 10. I would definitely recommend Juniper Enterprise Switches for users who want to integrate it.
I would rate Juniper Enterprise Routers a ten out of ten. We plan to keep using this solution.
Overall, this is a very good product. It is a very stable solution and I can recommend it. The only difficulty is that it is hard to set up. I would rate this solution and eight out of ten.
Overall, I find this to be a good product. The features are completely stable, customers are happy with their investment, although there is occasionally with the reliability of certain modules. I would rate this solution an nine out of ten.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Juniper is a leading company in MPLS technology and its equipment was one of the first ones that were ready for it. This is why juniper devices are often used by service providers, more so than Cisco devices. Juniper is one of the leaders in deploying the ISSU feature, although it now exists in Cisco and other solutions as well. Certain Juniper models can be used only for the routing tables, which is important because in some cases, the routing table size is one of the factors. My advice to anybody who is implementing this solution is to first have the proper training to help understand the product and all of its features. In most cases that I have seen, the company will order the device and are not aware of the features. They might have issues with sizing or getting the wrong product. Customers need to review the products in the context of their requirements and then build the high-level and low-level designs based on those requirements. Absolutely, you should not try to configure the device before completing the training because you need to take security into consideration. Overall, this is a good device. I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
I'm not sure which version of the solution we are using. It's not that I don't like the product, but I prefer the SDN solutions. It's a good product. My personal preference is for direct, however. Juniper solutions are very flexible and very good. They offer very good performance. I have no problems with them. I'd feel comfortable recommending the solution. Other companies should try it out. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
We are simply an integrator. We are advise clients about the product. We don't have a partnership directly with Juniper. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. They're a good solution to work with.
Juniper is very user-friendly, efficient, and we're very happy with it. I don't know if there are other vendors that have the same kind of service out there. We are very pleased with the performance of the Juniper router. The biggest I lesson I learned from using Juniper is never go back to Cisco. I would rate it a ten out of ten. We're very happy with the current functionality.
From my experience in the ISP world, I think that Juniper Enterprise Routers are very good products. I would recommend this solution for anybody who is looking to start small and scale up because I think that you can easily do that using Juniper products. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Juniper is a leading company in the MPLS technology, which is one of the reasons that they are used more often than Cisco by service providers. My advice to anybody who is implementing this device is to have the proper training, first. It should not be configured before the training is complete. Also, be sure to understand the product and the features that it has to offer. In most of the cases that I have seen, the company is not really aware of the features. This means that they might have sizing issues with the product and end up with the wrong one. The high-level and low-level design should be based on the actual requirements. Sometimes, adding services to the appliance is not what you want to do. You can use this router only for routing tables in some cases because, for service providers, the routing table size is one of the major factors. Whether it is Cisco, Juniper, Fortinet, or Palo Alto, you will see a reduction in throughput for every service that is added to the appliance. This is why proper design is so important. Overall, this is a good device. I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.