Venn Software vs Veracode comparison

Venn Software and Veracode are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Venn Software is ranked #65, while Veracode is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Venn Software holds a 0.1% mindshare in AS, compared to Veracode’s 9.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Venn Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Veracode users who would recommend it.

Venn Software

Read 3 Venn Software reviews

101 Views
21 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Veracode

Read 201 Veracode reviews

14,613 Views
9,530 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Venn Software

Veracode

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Veracode and Venn Software compete in the tech market. Users are happier with Veracode's pricing and support, but Venn Software offers superior features, making it attractive for its perceived value.

Features: Veracode provides robust security assessments, integration capabilities, and straightforward deployment. Venn Software focuses on comprehensive data protection, customizable reporting, and superior feature sets. Venn's emphasis on data protection enhances its attractiveness as a feature-rich product.

Room for Improvement: Veracode faces challenges with usability, complex configurations, and accessibility. Venn Software struggles with performance under heavy load, a steep learning curve, and needs better performance efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode offers straightforward deployment and responsive support, aiding integration processes. Venn Software requires more time and expertise for deployment but provides comprehensive support once the initial learning phase is completed.

Pricing and ROI: Veracode has competitive setup costs with favorable ROI prospects. Venn Software requires higher upfront investments, justified by long-term ROI achievements, indicating its value despite initial expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed Venn Software vs. Veracode Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Venn Software vs. Veracode

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Venn Software

Ranking in Application Security Tools

65th

Average Rating

9.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (31st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (33rd)

Veracode

Ranking in Application Security Tools

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

201

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Container Security (8th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (3rd), Static Code Analysis (1st), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Venn Software is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode is 9.2%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2110356

Growth Specialist at Digitrends Soultions

Great for hybrid workers, minimizes latency and delivers great performance

We haven't encountered major issues with the solution. We are really happy that we decided to purchase Venn Software, although they are quite new. The initial setup is seamless. It's not overly complex. In our experience, for the most part, the solution is reliable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches. That said, the performance could be a bit better. We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities. The solution needs to offer better local or regional support to cater to offshore users.

Read full review

David-Robertson

Director Enterprise Architecture at Exeter Finance Corp.

Static scanning and software composition analysis are very helpful, but the usability needs improvement

Static scanning and software composition analysis are very helpful. My colleagues and I don't need to be experts on all of those ancillary things, so we can focus more on the business deliverables. They have a pretty good tool that allows me to run scans of my local integrated development environment. I can find a lot of those flaws a lot sooner than I would if I had to wait for these cloud-based scans. They've come out with some sort of automated fix feature. I haven't used it, but they gave us a demo of it, and that one looks promising. I don't know if it's ready for prime time yet.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We don't need to go to the physical office, and it only requires minimal supervision or assistance from our IT Team."

"It allows us to improve our security and prevent company files and data leaks."

"Since the software is launched directly from the computer, not remotely delivered, it has minimized latency and response time."

"The analysis of the vulnerabilities and the results are the most valuable features."

"Static scanning and software composition analysis are very helpful. I and my colleagues don't need to be an expert on all of those ancillary things, so we can focus more on the business deliverables."

"It has improved the quality of code being delivered for test and its vulnerability resolutions timeline has improved."

"The product’s policy reporting for ensuring compliance with industry standards and regulations is great."

"It pinpoints the errors. Its accuracy is very interesting. It also elaborates on flaws, meaning it provides you with details about what is valid or not and how something can be fixed."

"Developer Sandboxes help move scanning earlier within the SDLC."

"I like Veracode's static scanning and SCA. We use three static scans, software composition analysis, and dynamic scans. We haven't used dynamic scanning as much, but we're trying to integrate that into our environment more."

"The platform itself has a lot of AppSec best practices information, especially in the mitigation recommendation process."

More Veracode pros

Cons

"We'd like to see a bit more done with the deployment capabilities."

"Currently, Venn only uses two platforms/applications: Windows and Mac. It would be great if they could also add more platforms since some BYOD employees might be using an application other than Windows or Mac - for example, Linux."

"It would be better to have the back end more efficient."

"When we scan binary, when we perform binary analysis, it could go faster. That has a lot to do with the essence of scanning binary code, it takes a little bit longer. Certain aspects, depending on what type of code it is, take a little long, especially legacy code."

"The results of agent-based software composition analysis are not connected to policy scanning. So, for me, the only thing that Veracode can improve in Software Composition Analysis is to connect it with the policy scan because, at present, it is a bit inconvenient for those in our organization who use agent-based Software Composition Analysis. In the end, they need to make a static scan with all those libraries in order to receive that report. If Veracode implemented a connection between agent-based static scan and static scanning itself, it would be great because it would lead to fewer operations in order to prepare release documentation and release reporting from Veracode. We recently had a conversation with Veracode about it."

"There were some additional manual steps or work involved that we should not have needed to do."

"Improvements can be made to Veracode, particularly in terms of process. If it could be integrated directly with code repositories such as Bitbucket or GitHub, without the need to create a pipeline to upload and decode code, it would simplify the code scan process significantly."

"Veracode has plenty of data. The problem is the information on the dashboards of Veracode, as the user interface is not great. It's not immediately usable. Most of the time, the best way to use it is to just create issues and put them in JIRA... But if I were a startup, and only had products with a good user interface, I wouldn't use Veracode because the UI is very dated."

"The number of false positives could be reduced a lot. For each good result, we are getting somewhere around 15 to 20 false positives."

"From what we have seen of Veracode's SCA offering, it is just average."

"Veracode's container scanning could be improved. We containerize all the platforms we use inside a Docker image. For example, we create a Microsoft Docker image that we build our application on top of. I would like Veracode to implement IT scans before we commit the code."

More Veracode cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is really fair compared to a lot of other tools on the market."

"Pricing-wise, I find it a bit expensive because it's based on the number of users requesting access to Veracode."

"We are still considering it at the enterprise level. It has a subscription-based model. We find its price a little high based on the features it provides."

"Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive."

"The pricing is fair."

"I recommend going for a one-year licensing with CA, because currently they are the leaders in this field with more features and a much better turn around time with a cheaper position, but there are a lot of new companies coming up in the market and they are building up their platforms."

"Veracode is affordable for large organizations, but its pricing may be out of reach for small and medium companies."

"The pricing is a bit high."

More Veracode pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

What do you like most about Veracode?

The SAST and DAST modules are great.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode?

The product’s price is a bit higher compared to other solutions. However, the tool provides good vulnerability and database features. It is worth the money.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Intune vs Venn Software

Compared 68% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Venn Software

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs Venn Software

Compared 13% of the time

More Venn Software Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Veracode

Compared 19% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Veracode

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs Veracode

Compared 7% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Veracode

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Veracode

Compared 4% of the time

More Veracode Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Remote Access

June 2025

Download Venn Software product report

Buyer's Guide

Veracode

May 2025

Download Veracode product report

Also Known As

No data available

Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect

Overview

Venn Software is a powerful platform lauded for its robust features, intuitive UI, and responsive customer support. Users appreciate its scalability, customization options, and seamless integration capabilities. However, a few reviews mention occasional performance issues and a steep learning curve, making it challenging for beginners. Based on user reviews, Venn Software provides a reliable solution for businesses seeking advanced functionality, but newcomers may require additional time and support to fully utilize its potential.

Venn Software

Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.

Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.

What are the key features of Veracode?

Static Analysis (SAST) - Scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment.
Dynamic Analysis (DAST) - Examines applications in a running state to detect flaws in real-time.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Identifies risks in open-source libraries and third-party components.
Manual Penetration Testing - Offers expert analysis for more complex vulnerabilities.
Integrations with DevOps tools - Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.

What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?

Early detection of vulnerabilities - Helps developers fix security issues early in the development process.
Scalability - Supports organizations with large-scale application portfolios.
Compliance support - Ensures applications meet various security standards and regulations.
Developer training - Provides tools for educating developers on secure coding practices.
Comprehensive reporting - Offers detailed reports that track remediation and risk trends.

Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.

Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.

Veracode

Sample Customers

Venn is currently being used by 700+ organizations. The newest version of our secure workspace is selling not only to our existing customer base but to new companies like Voya, ModSquad, TTech and many others.

Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.

Buyer's Guide

Venn Software vs. Veracode

June 2025

Free Report: Venn Software vs. Veracode

Find out what your peers are saying about Venn Software vs. Veracode and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Venn Software vs. Veracode report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.