No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages vs Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
488th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Windows Server 2022 (Window...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
484th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Azam S M - PeerSpot reviewer
Infrastructure Lead at Danat Fz LLC
Container workloads have run reliably and now support secure, customizable services
It is important that Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages has long-term support for mission-critical operations, because there are applications which need to be updated if we are going with a newer version. I do not see areas for improvement in Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages because it satisfies our requirements. Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages is 99% stable and reliable. It is not our primary OS; we are using it for specific services for containers and specific services. We have also introduced AI into the platform. For example, if an updated version of Redis is available, that updated version will not be available in Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages repository. In that case, we have to pull it directly from the Redis servers and install it manually for it to work for us. I give this product a rating of 9.
NP
Infrastructure Administrator at a marketing services firm with 10,001+ employees
Centralized infrastructure has streamlined SQL and collaboration workloads while saving administration time
I believe Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages can still be improved; it is not perfect yet. I think there should be a lesser number of patches, as every time the system is patched, the vulnerabilities that I scan always show some vulnerabilities. The product should be hardened from the beginning itself. Nothing else comes to mind now regarding disadvantages, but perhaps it requires more brainstorming. So far, I think it is all good with no additional features or integrations needed in Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages. Security must be enhanced, for sure.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages is easy to learn, which is my favorite part about it, as the commands are very easy."
"Regarding value for money, organizations that provide services typically use Ubuntu as their primary OS, which is secure, compatible, and developer-friendly, allowing our DevOps team to utilize it effectively for daily deployments and configurations."
"The biggest advantage of Windows Server for me is that it is more secure and adds security complexity to the environment."
"I see savings in time and money with Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages."
"The installation of Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages is very easy."
 

Cons

"Despite mentioning many advantages, an area for improvement in Ubuntu is its application support, as it lacks many GUI-friendly applications that are available on Windows or macOS, which limits usability for tasks requiring specific software."
"There are a few applications that are not easy to deploy on Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages, so we need to have some workarounds for that."
"I think there should be a lesser number of patches, as every time the system is patched, the vulnerabilities that I scan always show some vulnerabilities."
"I do not see any return on investment from Windows Server, and I do not see that it is saving me time or money."
"Microsoft needs to act faster. They have to merge the level of support to solve problems at once."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages?
We are going with the open source version and are not purchasing Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages.
What needs improvement with Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages?
There are a few applications that are not easy to deploy on Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages, so we need to have some workarounds for that. For example, certain appli...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages vs. Windows Server 2022 (Windows Server 2022) | Support by SupportedImages and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.