Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection comparison

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Trend Vision One Endpoint S...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

131

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (3rd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (6th)

Webroot Business Endpoint P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

42nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is 1.8%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

John Trembly

Technical Specialist at Iona Catholic Secondary School

Provides a single dashboard, integrates well, and has predictive machine learning

Microsoft's new Azure Code Signing is causing a lot of issues for us with One Endpoint Security. We currently have two systems in operation, on-prem and SaaS, and many of the agents won't upgrade beyond version B11564 because these newer versions require Azure Code Signing compliance on the endpoint. If we are not up to date with our Windows updates, we don't have this compliance. Irrespective of the Windows version we are running, we have to apply patches to the machines, if the OS is not damaged, to make them compliant. After that, we can upgrade to the latest version of the respective agent. This process also applies to both Deep Security and Workload Security. I have two production servers: one for Windows and another for Mac. These servers are available in both on-premise and SaaS versions. Additionally, I have a test server that is located on-premises. The significant distinction with the SaaS version is the absence of a test server where I can install a new version. This means I can't allow the agents on it to upgrade and then perform testing. In contrast, with the production SaaS version of One Endpoint Security, I have numerous agents transitioning and coming online. It's essential that these agents upgrade to a newer version. Among these agents, there are five or six different versions, not counting the really old ones that have yet to upgrade due to ACS non-compliance. I can't leave the testing phase for an extended period because I still have outdated agents that need to be updated. These agents can't be left hanging while I wait to test the newest version that has just been released. New versions seem to come out every couple of months in the SaaS environment. In the past, when I solely used the on-premises version, I would review security bulletins for the SaaS version to identify any issues. I'm apprehensive about potential future situations involving this, primarily because the majority of our agents now operate on the cloud version. If a problem is discovered, rolling back on those agents would be challenging. It would require careful operation to revert them to a different version. The on-premises version of One Endpoint Security has an update function that allows us to manually update a bunch of servers. For example, if I just turned on a policy, I can force the agents to quickly download the policy and start following the update procedure or update settings. However, this function is not available in the SaaS version. This is because the system cannot communicate with the agent through the firewall. The SaaS version has an automatic update function and an update source entry in the update agents sub-menu, but it does not have a way to force agents to update. This is a problem because we cannot automatically update the agents. We have to manually log in to the machines and give them an update command. Currently, we have no choice but to wait until the agents find the updates themselves.

Read full review

Rick Cassel

Owner at R. A. Cassel & Associates

Lightweight and not hard to set up however, does not offer good reporting

We've had a couple of events both this year and last year where it just didn't seem to catch ransomware, which is impossible to do if someone has hands-on with the system. There were some things that they had or used to have or don't have that I still haven't figured out called journaling. And it was supposed to be a way to roll back changes that were made. However, they're telling me they don't have that. That's not in the system. It’s my understanding that it doesn’t actually scan any files at all. They just look at their database of files they've scanned previously, and either it matches or doesn't. That might be where the shortcoming is, is that it just can't stay up-to-date fast enough to stop new things that are coming in. It's an after-the-fact anti-virus. It doesn't do anything proactive. The virus has to hit the machine before it detects it. There is one thing that is deplorable with the product that I would change as soon as I found a better one. However, the reports are worthless. You go and look at a scan report and cannot get a log of machines. I can log into a console and see the files were scanned every day at 2:00 AM, and they all passed green or something was detected and removed. However, you have to go to the console. I don't have anything that I can send to my client on reports. What they give you is a bunch of bar graphs with no details. You can't drill down. It'll say two infections. However, it doesn't tell you what machines. You've just really got several different reports, and they're all just a bunch of graphs and wasted paper. There's nothing really substantial. The reports that I can use for client-facing, once a month, to say, "Here, we scanned all these workstations. Here are our results," don’t exist. They've got fake reports. I've screamed about that for years, and they just won't do anything. Therefore, I created my own little up-to-date or not ask fail-type report. I send that to them in place of a report directly from a product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Offers great application control, vulnerability protection, and behavior monitoring."

"It is updated automatically without much intervention from our side. We can also get some reports easily."

"Apex One is flexible and offers a lot of visibility on the agent."

"DLP is a solid feature in the product. I like it very much. It is very useful in our environment. It is also a very stable solution. Their support is also very good."

"The XDR feature which provides us with real visibility into our environment is the most valuable."

"Apex One includes a built-in fine-grained DLP solution."

"The most favorable features have been behavior monitoring and zero-day threat protection."

"It's reduced administrative overhead."

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security pros

"The main reason we had Webroot is that it was cost-effective for our clients."

"Its ease of installation is valuable. It has been a low-resource tool and the continuous updates in the past have made it attractive from the standpoint of the trust level on the protection."

"They have a lot of features integrated from way back, which shows that the product developers know exactly what they're doing."

"The ease of use of the centralized admin console is its best asset."

"The solution has many features. It is very easy to define and set the policies based on the user groups, it does not take up a lot of resources in operation, and has provided us with a good track record of protection."

"Speed"

"I like that Webroot is very lightweight. It didn't bog down the machine, and more importantly, it had heuristics artificial intelligence to some degree. It wasn't like full-blown artificial intelligence, but something where you have one endpoint recognizing issues because it maintains a cloud database. If one client recognizes a threat, it would add it to the database, and almost immediately, every agent in the world would also know about that threat. That was very appealing to us. However, now it's becoming commonplace, whereas ventures like Symantec and McAfee were based more on the traditional model of definition and updates, and we were always falling behind. Webroot also has pretty good technical support."

"Auto-Remediation"

More Webroot Business Endpoint Protection pros

Cons

"We sometimes face issues with policies and rules while working with Apex One. They sometimes do not work."

"The pricing is very high. Despite the magnificent capabilities, the cost is still a concern. Additionally, we need more training resources for my team and I, such as developing labs and sessions to implement it more easily."

"We want to manage the policies in the group. Currently, if I am at one location and other users are at other locations, the main problem is that we cannot manage policies location-wise. The policy management should be improved. I should be able to group them based on the location. If one location has four policies and another location has the same policy, currently, I have to scroll the screen to find out the policy as per my location."

"Trend Vision One Endpoint Security should have a DLP (Data loss prevention) module."

"Apex One has some room for improvement on the agent side. I want to get more from the logs and those kinds of things. I want to see whether the agent has the proper updates or any issues with the machine itself."

"The support is slow and has room for improvement."

"I can't think of any specific areas that need improvement."

"The CPU usage when scanning is too high and we have run into bottlenecks were it consumes a lot of CPU time."

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security cons

"We need more control over when upgrades to the app are rolled out."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to focus on how they can widen their area of scope by not just being an antivirus tool anymore. The shortcoming in the customization area of the tool needs improvement."

"I want Webroot to be easier to use and set up. It is not very intuitive."

"We need to have a stronger defense against CryptoLock and other attackers."

"The reporting is the weakest part of the Webroot console. Frequently, I export to Excel to massage something into it to pass on to others."

"There should be a Webroot Business Endpoint Protection mobile app."

"Webroot is very reactionary. It waits until the threat is active within memory to try and detect it. They need better pre-execution detection and prevention."

"The solution could improve by providing better ransomware protection."

More Webroot Business Endpoint Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for Apex One is midrange, and worth the costs."

"The SaaS version is competitively priced and amazingly easy to set up."

"The price of Apex One is competitive and lower than the prices of the solutions we compared it to."

"The licensing fee and support are bundled together."

"The price of the solution was expensive in the first year we had it because we were purchasing it locally. This year we have a global discount for the license. There is an additional cost if you want maintenance support."

"The price is reasonable."

"The price is very good compared to other products."

"The pricing is reasonable and depends on user count."

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

"Our strategy was to overestimate the complexity and cost. It turned out that Webroot's assurance was justified."

"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."

"Get a trial, then a multi-year license."

"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."

"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."

"The pricing is high."

"Work on a price tier plan."

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

More Webroot Business Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

49%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

18%

Real Estate/Law Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Trend Micro Deep Security and Trend Micro Apex One?

Trend Micro Deep Security offers a lot of features. It guarantees security for your data center, cloud, and containers - all with a unified and comprehensive SaaS solution and without compromising ...

What do you like most about Trend Micro Apex One?

It is updated automatically without much intervention from our side. We can also get some reports easily.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro Apex One?

The pricing is very high, despite the solution’s capabilities.

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

Trend Micro Deep Security vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Comparisons

Compared 20% of the time

Trend Vision One vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 19% of the time

Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection

Compared 26% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection

Compared 19% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection

Compared 16% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Webroot Business Endpoint Protection

Compared 3% of the time

More Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Download Trend Vision One Endpoint Security product report

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security report

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection

Download Webroot Business Endpoint Protection product report

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection report

Also Known As

Trend Micro Apex One, OfficeScan, Trend Micro OfficeScan

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Overview

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security delivers comprehensive antivirus, data protection, and device management. It offers robust threat detection and is deployable on-premises or via the cloud, making it versatile for endpoint security across organizations.

Emphasizing reliable endpoint security, Trend Vision One guards workstations and servers with extended detection and response features. Its machine learning-driven threat detection offers protection from malware and viruses, including zero-day threats. With seamless updates and automation, it minimizes administrative burdens, making deployment efficient. Criticisms include high resource use during scans and integration complexities, with calls for improved data loss prevention and better encryption. Users see the need for enhanced Linux support and quicker security updates.

What features define Trend Vision One Endpoint Security?

Real-time threat detection: Provides immediate alerts on potential risks.
Virtual patching: Protects against known vulnerabilities without software updates.
Centralized management console: Facilitates efficient device management.
Machine learning: Enhances detection with advanced analytics.
Zero-day threat protection: Guards against unforeseen attacks.
Ransomware detection: Identifies and prevents ransomware incursions.
Automated updates: Ensures systems are protected with the latest safeguards.

Which benefits are crucial in reviews?

Reducing administrative overhead: Automation decreases time spent on routine tasks.
Efficient threat response: Facilitates quick identification and mitigation of risks.
Seamless system updates: Keeps protection up to date without disruptions.
Improving operational efficiency: Integrates smoothly with existing security solutions.

In the finance sector, Trend Vision One is implemented for robust data protection and regulatory compliance. Healthcare providers rely on it for protecting sensitive patient information from cyber threats. Retailers use it for safeguarding payment systems and customer data against breaches, ensuring uninterrupted business operations.

Trend Micro

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection provides comprehensive endpoint protection, antivirus, and security features across devices like mobiles, computers, and servers to prevent malware and other threats.

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection helps businesses manage endpoint security through its robust cloud application and integrates with RMM tools for improved management and pricing. It offers EMS service, automatic updates, and a lightweight agent, ensuring ease of use and minimal resource consumption across all devices. This solution maintains a cloud-based database for real-time threat recognition and delivers strong performance with low resource usage, leveraging heuristic AI for threat detection. Companies use it for its antivirus, firewall functions, device location and wiping, and security policy applications, contributing to effective security management.

What are the key features?

Endpoint Protection: Safeguards computers, mobiles, and servers from threats.
Cloud Integration: Manages security through a robust cloud application.
Automatic Updates: Ensures devices are consistently protected with the latest updates.
Lightweight Agent: Minimizes resource usage while delivering high performance.
Heuristic AI: Provides advanced threat detection and prevention capabilities.
EMS Service: Manages security effectively across all endpoints.

What benefits should you look for?

Efficiency: Low resource usage for optimal device performance.
Ease of Use: Simplified installation and configuration processes.
Real-Time Threat Detection: Immediate response to potential threats.
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with clear, transparent models.
Comprehensive Protection: Complete security measures for various devices.

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is implemented across industries to ensure robust endpoint security. Its integration with RMM tools allows for seamless management in IT environments, while its cloud-based threat detection provides essential cybersecurity for sectors such as healthcare, finance, and education.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, A&W Food Services of Canada, Babou, Beth Israel Deaconess Care Organization (BO), DCI Donor Services, Evalueserve, Gulftainer, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, MEDHOST

Mytech Partners

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection