OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

OpenText and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. OpenText is ranked #49 with an average rating of 6.5, while Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.9. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trellix’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,804 Views
1,606 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews

9,620 Views
7,119 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and OpenText Core Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint security category. Trellix seems to have the upper hand with its broader integration capabilities, making it a preferred choice for larger enterprises.

Features: Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers central management capabilities, encryption, device control, and data loss prevention. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection provides robust security features, lightweight operations, and is ideal for environments with limited resources.

Room for Improvement: Trellix users note the need for enhanced reporting functions and reduced resource consumption during scans. OpenText Core users desire better customer support response times, improved documentation, and consolidation of information.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix supports on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud environments, with customer service rated positively for technical expertise. OpenText Core focuses primarily on public cloud deployment, with efficient customer service, though some users experience resolution time delays.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix is positioned as a more expensive solution, justified by extensive features and integration capabilities, offering a significant ROI. OpenText Core is cost-effective, providing value for smaller budgets, but users wish for more flexible pricing tiers.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,140 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

49th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security P...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

158

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.8%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 3.8%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

Abdullah Al Hadi

Information Security Engineer at Nhq Distribution Ltd

Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies

There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Webroot's tech support is pretty good; they've given me some pointers."

"It monitors traffic and keeps us from getting ransomware or other viruses."

"Low performance requirements."

"There aren't any features that really stand out — I just want it to keep malware out of my system. To date, I haven't had any malware in my system."

"The feature we found most valuable is the AI functionality for maintaining endpoint security. This is very powerful."

"Their policy management, their cloud-based dashboard and user interface are very easy to navigate."

"I like that Webroot is very lightweight. It didn't bog down the machine, and more importantly, it had heuristics artificial intelligence to some degree. It wasn't like full-blown artificial intelligence, but something where you have one endpoint recognizing issues because it maintains a cloud database. If one client recognizes a threat, it would add it to the database, and almost immediately, every agent in the world would also know about that threat. That was very appealing to us. However, now it's becoming commonplace, whereas ventures like Symantec and McAfee were based more on the traditional model of definition and updates, and we were always falling behind. Webroot also has pretty good technical support."

"Its ease of installation is valuable. It has been a low-resource tool and the continuous updates in the past have made it attractive from the standpoint of the trust level on the protection."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"The solution includes a good combination of features for both signature and signature-less."

"Trellix Security Endpoint can promptly isolate any host machines directly from the console. If alerts are received and isolation is necessary, it can be accomplished through the console. The console itself holds significant value, accessible through a browser and allowing remote actions via cloud login."

"The package of protection that it provides is useful. It has antivirus, malware protection, VPN, and a whole bunch of other features."

"A great console with a user-friendly GUI."

"Trellix Endpoint Security offers robust access protection, addressing major concerns in prevention. It provides both application control and user access control within its access protection features."

"The solution is broken down into different components from the portals. Web filtering, which is an added feature has been great for us."

"It is very valuable in finding out unknown malware."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros

Cons

"We need to have a stronger defense against CryptoLock and other attackers."

"Its detection capability for certain attacks should be improved. It should have better and wider detection for certain malware attacks. It could also have some sort of RMN."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to focus on how they can widen their area of scope by not just being an antivirus tool anymore. The shortcoming in the customization area of the tool needs improvement."

"It would be nice if it had a feature for automatically generating reports on the client end for device status, security status and backup information."

"The console spins up relatively slowly, and some of the configuration items are obscure (e.g., reporting back one time per day is a default setting) and need to be tweaked."

"Their customer support should be better. We started having some issues with it, and we didn't get the required support."

"We need to know more details about how the virus interacted with the computer."

"The solution could improve by providing better ransomware protection."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"We'd like better UI on the management screen."

"The management console is a little bit difficult to understand for admins. You need a lot of time in order to become familiar with that. It is a little bit complicated and not too easy to understand. Its price can also be improved. Its price is higher than its competitors. McAfee also needs to have better cloud integration and more data centers in the EU. The cloud center should be in Europe or in Germany. In Germany, it is really important to have access to your data within the same country. Customer data needs to be placed and processed in the same country."

"The solution has problematic encryption, which needs reforming."

"Although they have increased the complexity, it has affected the scanning speed."

"The main area for improvement is the integration with Microsoft Windows Hello, which includes Face ID or fingerprint-based authentication. Currently, they don't support either, so users have to type in the username and password."

"The solution needs to improve its virtual patching capabilities. One area where it could improve is by offering a patch management solution bundled with its security products. This would make it even more competitive against solutions like Kaspersky that offer this feature."

"Some agents become old and then they don't communicate well any longer."

"Support-wise they need to be better."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."

"Work on a price tier plan."

"If you purchase for clients, then you are the managing billing entity. It's better to either get a monthly subscription check from your clients, or to prepay for the year (so as to not keep cash in reserve to pay the bill each month) IMHO."

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."

"The pricing is high."

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

"I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."

"The solution is very cost-effective."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"The price of McAfee is pretty similar to Symantec, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Licensing fees are paid yearly."

"There are some extra expenses for using the product, in addition to licensing related to the maintenance of the product."

"They should reduce the cost or make it free, open-source software."

"Compared to Bitdefender, Trellix Endpoint Security is more expensive, but considering it comes with DLP, the solution's price is fine."

"Pricing is fair."

"It is based on an annual subscription."

"Microsoft Defender is not cheap and from a cost perspective, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a better option."

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Real Estate/Law Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?

It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 18% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 15% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 8% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

August 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

July 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report

Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report

Also Known As

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Overview

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?

Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Mytech Partners

inHouseIT, Seagate Technology

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

August 2025

Free Report: OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.