TestingWhiz vs Worksoft Certify comparison

Cygnet.One and Worksoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Cygnet.One is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.0, while Worksoft is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.2. Cygnet.One holds a 0.2% mindshare in FT, compared to Worksoft’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cygnet.One users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Worksoft users who would recommend it.

TestingWhiz

Read 1 TestingWhiz review

225 Views
182 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Worksoft Certify

Read 68 Worksoft Certify reviews

3,867 Views
3,403 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

TestingWhiz

Worksoft Certify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between TestingWhiz and Worksoft Certify based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TestingWhiz

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

23rd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (11th)

Worksoft Certify

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Testing Tools (11th), Test Automation Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of TestingWhiz is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Worksoft Certify is 5.3%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Worksoft Certify	5.3%
TestingWhiz	0.2%
Other	94.5%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vijay-Sawale

Test Associate & Manager at Opus Technologies

Low code features and good customization but needs more customer-requested features

We utilized the solution to showcase our capabilities to customers or clients, and demonstrate how it can save money and achieve a return on investment through automation The organization was able to provide customers with business solutions by giving demos of various tools, assisting in securing…

Read full review

Venkata Manikanta Somala

Test Engineer at Wipro Limited

Best tool for SAP Environment & Powerfull Automation tool with user friendly interface

From my experience, Worksoft Certify is a good tool for automating SAP, and it also works fine with web apps. But while creating or running scripts, we do face some automation abort issues, which break the flow and need rework. Also, sometimes it feels a bit slow, especially when running more scripts together. If the speed and stability can be improved, that would really help. We are using CTM for scheduling and managing runs it’s useful, but there’s still some scope to improve things like live monitoring and checking results more easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"TestingWhiz is a low code, no code tool with integration facilities, such as with Jira, and can be used over the cloud."

"We love the Capture 2.0 feature. It seems to work very well."

"It is very user-friendly with an appealing UI, unlike a lot of other automation tools that we have evaluated. The fact that it can be used to across SAP and non-SAP applications (including web-based apps) is a big advantage. Using Certify Process Capture functionality has helped in hassle free test design creation, without the need to spend any extra effort to capture test steps and screenshots. The integration elements across HPE ALM and Solution Manager also work well."

"It's module based and it's giving functionality."

"The most valuable feature is its time saving. Once development is complete, the short time that it takes to execute a test is invaluable. It saves a number of dollars and man-hours."

"With autotesting, we have been able to eliminate duplication of test cases across those four areas. This has helped us knock down our number of test cases. Our test cases are also running more optimally. Therefore, it has very much helped in that sense, so we were able to eliminate a lot of test cases and get out of manual silos by running on autotesting, which is more efficient."

"Mostly in the area of project testing, the most immediate benefit is when you historically have manual testers do a certain job, and a full regression testing was previously done 100 percent manually. We have had cases where the release testing for an entire region would take around 12 weeks. With Worksoft, we are now down to two to three weeks. So, that is one use case where we have had success."

"With Worksoft, we have been able to automate six of our smoke tests in four months."

"It does allow for good reusability. When it's designed properly and utilized properly, we can put things in a way that allows for reusability, meaning a lot of reuse of VA01, if they're very similar flows, to keep it simple."

More Worksoft Certify pros

Cons

"Some features need to be implemented based on customer customization requests, which are currently not available."

"The product had some UI issues."

"I would like the GUI to be more user-friendly and intuitive. We want to be able to move assets from project to another project without having to be in the same project or the same folder structure."

"The updates for SAP Fiori have been great, where previously we saw a lot of issues. A year ago, it used to fail miserably."

"The overall speed and performance of this solution could be improved. In a future release, it would be useful to be able to do API testing."

"It would be great if our business testers could develop their own automated test cases. With every release you do, you have to go back and touch your old test cases and bring them up to speed, or develop new test cases. In the beginning, that is a challenge because you have to have someone who is certified in the tool to help you develop these test cases."

"There are some other more complete tools than Worksoft Certify, such as Tricentis Tosca. It has a quicker way of taking in a customer's feedback with more efficiency. I do not see Worksoft Certify having a lot of progress over the years that we have used the tool in this area."

"The primary area for improvement is the support service."

"We can use it for the web application, but we are facing stability-related challenges. The properties are getting changed. For example, when I am performing any operation on the text box but the development team has done some changes, our Worksoft scripts are getting changed. This is the main challenge that we are facing while developing tests for the web application in Worksoft Certify, where any changes in the backend are indirectly impacting our scripts. For the web application, there is a scarcity of resources. Unlike an SAP application that doesn't require much experience, for the web application, you require experienced people."

More Worksoft Certify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Our ROI is primarily a reduction in testing time. The testing, when we were doing it manually, was 30 to 40 percent of the project's cost."

"We have seen ROI by being able to free up and give time back to the business for other value-added work."

"Worksoft Certify is slightly more expensive compared to other automation tools that are available on the market. However, the majority of the clients who are utilizing this solution, don't care much about the price. The main aspect the clients look for is its stability and reliability on the automation and whether they are able to rely on the automation scripts."

"I don't have much idea about the pricing, but it is a licensed tool, and it is somewhat costly."

"We saved $1.3 million using Worksoft Certify in 2017."

"Worksoft Capture 2.0 can help our customers to accelerate their automation development at least 40 percent faster than any other commercial tools available in the market."

"It saves us time: approximately 50 percent."

"Worksoft has paid for itself fives times over."

More Worksoft Certify pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

17%

Retailer

12%

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	58

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestingWhiz?

It is cheaper compared to other tools. The tool is web-based with various licenses, including professional and enterprise editions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestingWhiz?

Some features need to be implemented based on customer customization requests, which are currently not available. Additionally, there is a need to improve the handling of less critical issues which...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TestingWhiz?

We utilized the solution to showcase our capabilities to customers or clients, and demonstrate how it can save money and achieve a return on investment through automation.

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Worksoft Certify?

A specific feature that I found to be the most valuable in the solution for our company's work processes stems from the fact that it is useful as a low-code automation tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Worksoft Certify?

Yeah, the setup and license cost is a bit high as per I known but if you’re working mostly on SAP, it’s worth it definitely. You just need to plan based on your project and how much you’ll use it.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Tricentis Tosca vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 69% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 4% of the time

Panaya Test Dynamix vs Worksoft Certify

Compared 3% of the time

More Worksoft Certify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

September 2025

Download TestingWhiz product report

Buyer's Guide

Worksoft Certify

August 2025

Download Worksoft Certify product report

Overview

TestingWhiz is a Codeless Automation Testing Tool for Software, Web, Mobile, Database, Cloud, Web Services and API testing. It is pillared on a strong architecture combined with intuitive Automation Engine and short learning curve that promises to take your test automation to the next level.

Cygnet.One

Worksoft Certify offers codeless automation for efficient test scripting by non-programmers. It integrates with SAP, supports multiple interfaces, and ensures seamless end-to-end testing, facilitating time savings and streamlined operations.

Worksoft Certify stands out for its unique codeless automation capabilities, enabling users without programming skills to easily create automated test scripts. Its Capture feature effortlessly records user actions, accelerating test development. Integration with SAP systems and support across various interfaces make it highly versatile. The tool's architecture allows for easy script maintenance and decouples scripts from data, speeding up testing processes while minimizing manual effort. Although it's known for excellence in automating SAP applications, there is room for improvement in areas like web and mobile integration, UI enhancements, and support responsiveness.

What are the key features of Worksoft Certify?

Codeless Automation: Enables easy script creation without coding skills.
Capture Feature: Records actions for rapid test development.
SAP Integration: Ensures seamless operation within SAP environments.
Interface Support: Enhances versatility across multiple platforms.
End-to-End Testing: Facilitates comprehensive testing cycles.

What are the benefits and ROI to consider?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces testing time.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Minimizes errors and enhances efficiency.
Supporting Transformations: Aids large-scale SAP and cloud transformations.
Scalability: Handles large datasets with stability and reliability.
Maintenance: Decoupled scripts ensure easy updates and management.

In industries relying on SAP and ERP systems, Worksoft Certify serves as a valuable tool for automating regression and integration testing. Organizations benefit from reduced manual testing effort and faster project delivery times. It's extensively utilized in sectors requiring large-scale SAP deployment and cloud application integration, making it integral in streamlining business operations.

Worksoft

Sample Customers

Verizon, IBM, Symantec, VMware, Hyundai, Choice Hotels, Intel, Autodesk, Frost

Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

September 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.