Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Tenable One Exposure Management Platform vs Verodin comparison

The compared Tenable and Trellix solutions aren't in the same category. Tenable is ranked #6 in CTEM , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 7.9% mindshare in the category. Trellix is ranked #9 in BAS , and holds a 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Tenable users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Tenable One Exposure Manage...
Read 5 Tenable One Exposure Management Platform reviews
  • 846 Views
  • 212 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Verodin
Read 1 Verodin review
  • 351 Views
  • 340 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Tenable One Exposure Management Platform and Verodin based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zafran Security, Cymulate, XM Cyber and others in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 868,029 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Tenable One Exposure Manage...
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Threat Intelligence Platforms (19th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (6th)
Verodin
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Tenable One Exposure Management Platform and Verodin aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Tenable One Exposure Management Platform is designed for Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) and holds a mindshare of 7.9%, up 3.1% compared to last year.
Verodin, on the other hand, focuses on Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS), holds 1.4% mindshare, down 1.9% since last year.
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Tenable One Exposure Management Platform7.9%
Cymulate17.2%
XM Cyber17.0%
Other57.9%
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Verodin1.4%
Pentera28.5%
Cymulate20.5%
Other49.6%
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
 

Featured Reviews

Jaya Shanker - PeerSpot reviewer
Has improved our vulnerability tracking and supports cloud-based monitoring with scheduled scans
We don't have any issues with Tenable One Exposure Management Platform. It works well for us, but the only problem is the licensing aspect. In the license, it becomes problematic because when we go to cloud security for vulnerability management, it will take five licenses instead of the one-on-one license that vulnerability exposure management requires. The license needs to be reviewed.
Read full review
reviewer945171 - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine
The integration engine needs to improve. We try to integrate it with other tools, especially with Splunk or with the MyDLP engine, and even with Microsoft Exchange. As much as they tried to make it seem like it was easy, it wasn't easy. There was a lot of stuff that we had to do that we ended up having to do via an API or something special for a new case. That's a big issue for me. Integration is daunting. It leaves a lot of room for failure and frustration. There are just little nuances that make everything difficult. You're supposed to be able to flip this toggle thing here, and you're supposed to be able to get the feedthrough from Splunk. Then, from there everything should be perfectly fine. However, when you find out it is not perfectly fine and you find out that it's because this thing isn't necessarily correct, you have to do an update on it or they have to update their file to make it work correctly. It's very small, minute things that aren't quite right. It's not something that you can really pinpoint. There's a lot of nuanced issues. It the nuanced technical issues that you would notice once you cross its path. It's not one of those "Hey, this is something I would know off the top of my head." They are very small nuance issues that make you say "Oh, well I guess we've got to go and change this thing now." You get this with certain tools - mostly with Mandiant tools more than anything else in general. It's one of those Mandiant quirks that still carries on and persists to this day - even with this tool.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"For me, the setup has been an easy process."
"The product gives us a lot of insight."
"The feature of vulnerability management and discovery is what I use."
"We find Tenable One Exposure Management Platform vulnerability prioritization effective overall because, with the scheduled scan running on our set schedule, we can remediate any findings and check on the next schedule if issues are closed, making it much easier for us to monitor vulnerabilities."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"I think it's a good product for risk-based or exposure-based vulnerability management."
"The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge."
 

Cons

"The product has limited reporting capabilities and it isn't great at allowing for customization in reports."
"Tenable needs to provide a better way to manage private clouds."
"The sensor update is a challenge that Tenable needs to address. Sometimes they behave abruptly, requiring me to rework reinstalling the sensors on the endpoints."
"The license needs to be reviewed."
"The sensor update is a challenge that Tenable needs to address."
"It would be nice if the product provided an agent for enforcing policies."
"The integration engine needs to improve."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
868,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Insurance Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
30%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable.ep?
The setup cost is reasonable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Tenable.ep?
There is not much room for improvement. However, the sensor update is a challenge that Tenable needs to address. Sometimes they behave abruptly, requiring me to rework reinstalling the sensors on t...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Tenable.ep?
I use this solution for vulnerability management for the infrastructure, one cloud security, CSPM, and application dynamic testing.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform
Compared 27% of the time
XM Cyber vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Logo
XM Cyber vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform
Compared 17% of the time
Picus Security vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Logo
Picus Security vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform
Compared 15% of the time
Cymulate vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Logo
Cymulate vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform
Compared 10% of the time
CyCognito vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Logo
CyCognito vs Tenable One Exposure Management Platform
Compared 8% of the time
More Tenable One Exposure Management Platform Competitors
Picus Security vs Verodin Logo
Picus Security vs Verodin
Compared 48% of the time
SafeBreach vs Verodin Logo
SafeBreach vs Verodin
Compared 27% of the time
Cymulate vs Verodin Logo
Cymulate vs Verodin
Compared 25% of the time
More Verodin Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
September 2025
Tenable One Exposure Management Platform reportDownload Tenable One Exposure Management Platform product report
Buyer's Guide
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
September 2025
Verodin reportDownload Verodin product report
 

Also Known As

Tenable.ep
No data available
 

Overview

You can now translate technical asset, vulnerability and threat data into clear business insights and actionable intelligence for security executives. Combine broad exposure coverage spanning IT assets, cloud resources, containers, web apps and identity platforms, with threat intelligence and data science from Tenable Research. Focus efforts to prevent likely attacks and accurately communicate cyber risk to support optimal business performance.

Tenable One is an exposure management platform that combines risk-based vulnerability management, web application security, cloud security and identity security.
Tenable

Equipped with FireEye frontline intelligence, the Verodin platform will measure and test security environments against both known and newly discovered threats, empowering organizations to identify risks in their security controls before a breach occurs, and rapidly adapt their defenses to the evolving threat landscape.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
AAFCU, Amuse, Axway, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, BCC Corporation, Blackboat, CapWealth Advisors, CBC, CERN, Lagardère, Land Bank of the Philippines, laya healthcare, Lindsay Automotive Group
Buyer's Guide
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
September 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Zafran Security, Cymulate, XM Cyber and others in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM). Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
868,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.