Symantec Advanced Authentication vs Venafi comparison

Broadcom and CyberArk are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Broadcom is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.0, while CyberArk is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in AS, compared to CyberArk’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of CyberArk users who would recommend it.

Symantec Advanced Authentic...

Read 9 Symantec Advanced Authentication reviews

330 Views
150 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

Venafi

Read 8 Venafi reviews

760 Views
230 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Symantec Advanced Authentic...

Venafi

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Symantec Advanced Authentication and Venafi are two prominent solutions in the security sector. Symantec Advanced Authentication is noted for its cost-effectiveness and customer support, while Venafi excels in feature extensiveness and overall value.

What features are offered by Symantec Advanced Authentication in comparison to Venafi?

Symantec Advanced Authentication is praised for multiple authentication methods, comprehensive access management, and cost-effectiveness. Venafi stands out for robust certificate management, automation capabilities, and enhanced security controls. Users needing advanced security controls may prefer Venafi, while those looking for versatile authentication may lean towards Symantec.

What areas of improvement can be found in Symantec Advanced Authentication in comparison to Venafi?

Users of Symantec Advanced Authentication suggest improvements in system integration, reporting tools, and user management functionalities. Venafi users highlight areas such as streamlining the configuration process, improving user management functions, and enhancing deployment efficiency.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Symantec Advanced Authentication in comparison to Venafi?

Symantec Advanced Authentication is noted for its straightforward deployment process and effective customer service. Venafi's deployment is slightly more complex due to its advanced features, but it also offers commendable customer support. Symantec is preferred for ease of deployment.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Symantec Advanced Authentication in comparison to Venafi?

Symantec Advanced Authentication is cost-effective with satisfactory ROI. Venafi, though more expensive, offers a superior return on investment due to its extensive functionality and security capabilities. Users find Symantec more affordable, with Venafi providing greater value through advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Symantec Advanced Authentication vs. Venafi Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Advanced Authentication vs. Venafi

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Symantec Advanced Authentic...

Ranking in Authentication Systems

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Venafi

Ranking in Authentication Systems

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Symantec Advanced Authentication is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Venafi is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Umair (Abu Mohaymin) Akhlaque

Group CEO at Flexsolutions

Ensures robust security features and ease of deployment, although it may lack some of the more modern authentication options

There has been a need for aggressive development to modernize the product and align it with contemporary security requirements. While the rebranding has been a step forward, further enhancements are essential to meet the evolving demands of the market. It lacks features such as ActiveSync Exchange security, and it doesn't offer alternatives like password-less authentication via biometrics or patches. While Symantec mainly relies on traditional token-based or password-based methods, newer authentication methods are missing from its repertoire. Support services often lack promptness and depth of knowledge, leaving customers waiting for weeks to resolve issues. In the realm of multifactor authentication, swift resolution of problems is critical, as any slowdown or interruption can significantly impact operations. Urgent improvement is necessary to ensure that support responses are faster and more effective, aligning with the demands of MFA implementation.

Read full review

Adam Goldstein

Systems Engineer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

Automates certificate management across platforms and has enhanced integration support

Venafi's automation capabilities were significant, as they allowed us to automate certificate rotation and deployment effectively. We integrated it with GlobalSign and aimed to automate DNS verification, although challenges remained. Venafi's platform-agnostic nature was beneficial for handling certificates across different systems like IIS, AWS, and Azure. It ensures centralized certificate management, which is crucial for compliance and maintaining best practices. It significantly improved our operational efficiency by automating certificate workflows. This reduced the number of certificates requiring manual management, freeing internal resources from deploying trivial certificates. While some complex certificates still needed manual intervention, automating simpler ones eliminated internal bottlenecks associated with tasks like uploading certificates to Imperva. By automating these processes, we reduced errors, streamlined workflows, and eliminated the need to repeatedly remember and execute complex procedures, ultimately increasing our overall operational efficiency. The automation capabilities are good; when properly configured, it performs as expected.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the most valuable aspects is its remarkable stability."

"One of the most valuable features of this solution is that it's a strong authentication solution that's able to integrate with applications."

"It tells us exactly what we want in terms of authentication to various applications and provides protection for users who access them."

"Rules on Risk Authentication are very good."

"The most valuable feature of Venafi is the automation that helps save time and reduce human error."

"We use Venafi for PKI certificates."

"Venafi's technical support is impressively fast."

"It's definitely worth the money to have Venafi as a tool; it's definitely miles away from the competition, in my opinion."

"The most important feature for us is the ease of use. If something is not available, we can develop our own scripts for it. We can create change management around this tool."

"Automating anything, whether on-prem or cloud, is possible."

"The most valuable feature of Venafi is that it provides a seamless user interface and integrations."

"Venafi's automation capabilities were significant, as they allowed us to automate certificate rotation and deployment effectively."

More Venafi pros

Cons

"We have seen quite a few issues with bugginess. It is indeed pretty buggy and we have had to install some fixes."

"Advanced Authentication talks about the Device ID. But how the device ID is captured, I want to know more about that."

"Urgent improvement is necessary to ensure that support responses are faster and more effective, aligning with the demands of MFA implementation."

"This solution could be improved with risk-based authentication. I think that this product has everything that most customers are looking for, but modern technology has people looking for security tools with risk-based authentication, which they have a separate tool for. If they could integrate this, it would improve Symantec Advanced Authentication. They have to look at what's newly trending and how things are moving forward, and then adapt and adopt those features. Symantec's technical support should also be improved, in terms of response time."

"The product was really good when it was a Venafi product. However, since its acquisition by CyberArk, there has been a lack of significant innovations."

"Venafi could enhance its offerings by providing more automation features."

"Venafi excels in automating certificate rotation and deployment but could enhance its offering by improving support for hardware security modules like Fortanix and providing more advanced, out-of-the-box integrations with public certificate authorities for DNS re-verification."

"I would like to see included in the next release of Venafi integration with the cloud HSM's, Hardware Security Module. Additionally, I would say other cloud services, because it's not only cloud that's essential. If you have a customer that has a lot of their IT moved into cloud, integration with different cloud services is always an area to improve."

"There's definitely lots of room for improvement with Venafi. They have a website where we can suggest new features, and they need to take that a little bit more seriously."

"Venafi's overall installation could be made easier."

"The product was really good when it was a Venafi product. However, since its acquisition by CyberArk, there has been a lack of significant innovations. They are pushing for cloud adoption, but we prefer on-premises solutions due to regulatory concerns."

"There are quite a few different technical aspects of Venafi that I feel they just missed out on; I'd have to look at my notes for the specifics."

More Venafi cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is reasonable."

"There are eventually going to be implementation costs. Sometimes you're required to have custom code developments there, so that has to be part of the implementation price."

"Venafi's pricing appears to be competitive within the market."

"The pricing model is complex, considering factors beyond the number of certificates. This complexity can make our payments to Venafi challenging if costs continue to rise. It is good but more expensive than the competitors."

"I feel that it's fairly priced compared to other solutions we evaluated, such as IBM, SailPoint, and KiteServer. It is fairly priced and offers good value."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Symantec Advanced Authentication?

One of the most valuable aspects is its remarkable stability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Advanced Authentication?

The price is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Symantec Advanced Authentication?

See all answers

What do you like most about Venafi?

We use Venafi for PKI certificates.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Venafi?

I was the member who decided it, so I'm aware of the pricing. I feel that it's fairly priced compared to other solutions we evaluated, such as IBM, SailPoint, and KiteServer. It is fairly priced an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Venafi?

We have not faced any kind of disadvantage regarding Venafi, but they could improve on the bugs, as sometimes the system gets stuck.

See all answers

Comparisons

Thales Authenticators vs Symantec Advanced Authentication

Compared 100% of the time

More Symantec Advanced Authentication Competitors

AppViewX CERT+ vs Venafi

Compared 41% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs Venafi

Compared 30% of the time

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs Venafi

Compared 12% of the time

Axiad Conductor vs Venafi

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Venafi

Compared 7% of the time

More Venafi Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Advanced Authentication

June 2025

Download Symantec Advanced Authentication product report

Buyer's Guide

Venafi

June 2025

Download Venafi product report

Also Known As

CA Advanced Authentication, CA Strong Authentication, CA Risk Authentication, Arcot WebFort, Arcot RiskFort

No data available

Overview

CA Advanced Authentication provides a secure, user-convenient and cost-effective way to protect online and mobile applications. The solution consists of two components: CA Risk Authentication allows the enterprise to silently and transparently collect data and assess risk based on device identification, location and user behavior, among other factors, and CA Strong Authentication provides a wide variety of software-based, two-factor authentication credentials and technology to make passwords more secure. Together they enable an intelligent, layered security approach to protect user identities and organizational data.

Take the assessment

Broadcom

Venafi automates protection for machine identities, which all organizations rely on to keep communications between machines secure and private. Venafi generates the machine identity intelligence necessary to automatically safeguard the flow of information to trusted machines and prevent communication with untrusted ones - all at machine speed and scale.

CyberArk

Sample Customers

Global bank, Large Filipino Bank and SK Infosec

Surescripts, CME Group, TD Bank Group, Aetna, MoneyGram, Zions Bancorp, Cisco

Buyer's Guide

Symantec Advanced Authentication vs. Venafi

June 2025

Free Report: Symantec Advanced Authentication vs. Venafi

Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec Advanced Authentication vs. Venafi and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Symantec Advanced Authentication vs. Venafi report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.