Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Sonar and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Tenable is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5. Sonar holds a 20.4% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Sonar users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Tenable users who would recommend it.
SonarQube Server (formerly ...
Read 117 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews
  • 38,362 Views
  • 24,552 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
Tenable.io Web Application ...
Read 17 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews
  • 1,889 Views
  • 1,492 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

SonarQube and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning compete in the realm of quality assurance and application security. Tenable.io seems to have the upper hand due to its robust security-centric capabilities and comprehensive vulnerability scanning across web applications, which align well with security benchmarks.

Features: SonarQube Server supports a wide range of programming languages and offers customizable features and rules that help improve code quality. It integrates well with various tools and provides a community-driven plugin ecosystem. Tenable.io offers extensive vulnerability scanning capabilities and integrates seamlessly into existing security infrastructure, focusing on delivering robust security benchmarks and comprehensive web application assessments.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube faces challenges in ease of configuration, multi-language support, and managing false positives. Improvements in its security scanning capabilities and a more intuitive interface could enhance usability. Tenable.io requires more flexible reporting options and better vulnerability management processes. Enhancements in dashboard functionalities and API scanning support are also suggested.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube, adaptable to various environments including on-premises and hybrid cloud setups, involves a learning curve with its reliance on community support and dedicated management. Tenable.io's SaaS model in the public cloud offers ease of use, though there are calls for improved technical support and user support structures. Pricing is a consideration, with Tenable.io being more expensive due to its advanced security features.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube provides an open-source version with optional paid plugins, making it cost-effective for teams focusing on code quality, although enterprise features might come at a higher cost. Tenable.io is costly, especially for small businesses, but its comprehensive security features justify the expense. Both solutions typically provide positive ROI by enhancing security measures and code quality, varying based on deployment scale and feature requirements.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 870,701 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SonarQube Server (formerly ...
Ranking in Application Security Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
117
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)
Tenable.io Web Application ...
Ranking in Application Security Tools
18th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 20.4%, down from 25.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.3%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)20.4%
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning1.3%
Other78.3%
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Sthembiso Zondi - PeerSpot reviewer
Consistent improvements in code quality and security with effective integration and reliable technical support
The features of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) that I find most useful are the suggestions received from reviewing the code. When they review the code, they provide suggestions on how to fix it, and we find those very useful from a development perspective. We use SonarQube Server's (formerly SonarQube) centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve. We use that for organizational improvement purposes. The ability to tailor metrics tracking in SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has been beneficial to my team. There are team-specific dashboards which are related to specific repositories they utilize, and we have that aggregative dashboard that shows the whole organization's performance. We can drill down per specific repository, which makes it easier for the team to improve specific things.
Read full review
Jahanzeb Feroze Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Highly Recommended Solution with Latest Scanning Methods
The setup of the solution is straightforward. It involves installing the package and gaining access. It took no time at all since we deployed it on the cloud. We assigned the necessary configurations, and everything was set up and ready to go within a few seconds. I would rate the setup as a perfect ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features are the dashboard reports and the ease of integrating it with Jenkins."
"Code Convention: Using the tool to implement some sort of coding convention is really useful and ensures that the code is consistent no matter how many contributors."
"The product is simple."
"We are using the Community edition. So, we don't have to incur any licensing costs. This is the best part."
"It is an easy tool that you can deploy and configure. After that you can measure the history of your obligation and integrate it with other tools like GitLab or GitHub or Azure DevOps to do quality code analysis."
"SonarQube: Recording of issues over a period of time, with an indication of the addition in the new issues or the reduction of existing issues (which were fixed)."
"SonarQube is one of the more popular solutions because it supports 29 languages."
"The most valuable features are the segregation containment and the suspension of product services."
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros
"The solution's instant reports feature is the most effective for detecting threats."
"The solution is stable."
"Tenable provides the end analysis results covering all the published vulnerabilities and information on the market."
"Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product."
"It is fully automated."
"The most valuable features of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are the integration into specific use cases and scanning. All of the features of the solution are useful."
"It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."
"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning provides a detailed report, identifying functions that are complex and need to be more maintainable and readable."
More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros
 

Cons

"Any suggestions for potential improvements may include bill of materials functionality."
"The solution could improve by providing more advanced technologies."
"Code security could be better. They are already focusing on it, but I see a lot of improvement opportunities over there. I can see a lot of false positives in terms of security. They need to make the tests more accurate so that the false positives are not detected so frequently. It would also help if they provided us with an installer."
"In terms of analysis and findings, other tools provide more in-depth insights and detailed steps to mitigate or handle issues."
"If you don't have any experience with the configuration or how to configure the files, it can be complicated."
"The BPM language is important and should be considered in SonarQube."
"When we have a thousand products published over it, we expect it to be more efficient in terms of serving requests from the browser."
"Although it has Sonar built into it, it is still lacking. Customization features of identifying a particular attack still need to be worked on. To give you an example: if we want to scan and do a false positive analysis, those types of features are missing. If we want to rescan something from a particular point that is a feature that is also missing. It’s in our queue. That will hopefully save a lot of time."
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons
"It isn't easy to manage vulnerabilities in Tenable."
"The report customization needs to be better."
"Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments."
"The reporting has a very limited customization capability."
"The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers."
"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"The platform's technical support services could be better."
"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not very user-friendly and you need a lot of information to get proper reports. The tool's support is not very responsive."
More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For the Community edition, there is no extra cost. It's totally free. The Enterprise edition, Data Center edition, and Developer edition are the paid versions."
"SonarQube is a fairly affordable solution for a larger scale if you have a specific role or specific department for secure code."
"I am satisfied with the pricing."
"Compared to similar solutions, SonarQube was more accessible to us and had more benefits, with regards to size of the code base and supported languages. Apart from the Enterprise licensing fee, there are no additional costs."
"We use the tool's community edition."
"There are many different packages with different pricing options available. We are able to try what we have and if we need extra features we can upgrade the license."
"We're using their free Community Edition version."
"The beauty of this solution is the free open-source version is capable enough in doing pretty much what an enterprise-level version can do."
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice
"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."
"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."
"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."
"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."
"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."
"The pricing is okay."
"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
870,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
10%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business32
Midsize Enterprise21
Large Enterprise75
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?
I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...
See all answers
Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?
SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...
See all answers
How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?
We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...
See all answers
What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?
The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?
Improvements could include providing coverage reports in the free version and features related to security reports. Also, enhancing technical support would be beneficial as there is room for improv...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?
I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning as it provides us with good reports, which help improve our code base, despite the lack of financial benefits. Overall, I would rate it seven o...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 21% of the time
GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 9% of the time
Coverity Static vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Coverity Static vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 9% of the time
Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 6% of the time
Semgrep vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Logo
Semgrep vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
Compared 5% of the time
More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors
Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Logo
Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
Compared 18% of the time
Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Logo
Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
Compared 9% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
Compared 9% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
Compared 8% of the time
Veracode vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Logo
Veracode vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
Compared 6% of the time
More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)
September 2025
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reportDownload SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
September 2025
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reportDownload Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report
 

Also Known As

Sonar
No data available
 

Overview

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?
  • Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
  • Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
  • Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
  • CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
  • Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.
What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?
  • Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
  • Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
  • Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
  • Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
IMDEX
Buyer's Guide
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
September 2025
Free Report: SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
870,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.