SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Sonar and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while Tenable is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5. Sonar holds a 20.8% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Sonar users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 117 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

40,838 Views
26,136 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 17 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

2,035 Views
1,608 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

SonarQube Server and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning compete in the software development and security scanning market. Tenable.io seems to have the upper hand in comprehensive security scanning while SonarQube offers a balanced approach to code quality and security.

Features: SonarQube Server provides support for over 20 programming languages and offers customizable coding rules, making it highly versatile. Integration features and an active community contribute to its strength. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning excels in robust security scanning with prioritization of vulnerabilities and detailed reporting, focusing primarily on web application security.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube could enhance its programming language support, improve security scanning capabilities, and streamline its user interface. Users cite analysis time and configuration as areas for improvement. Technical support is sometimes insufficient. Tenable.io could improve its user interface, reporting features, and dashboard usability. Users desire better pricing transparency and cloud platform support coordination.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube Server offers deployment across hybrid, on-premises, and cloud environments, but relies heavily on community support due to its open-source model. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning offers streamlined deployment in public and private clouds, though some find its technical support lacking responsiveness and prices less transparent.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube's open-source foundation offers cost-effective deployment with optional paid plug-ins. The ROI is favorable despite complaints about premium version pricing. Tenable.io's pricing is deemed reasonable by some, though small businesses may find it costly. Its focus on identifying and fixing vulnerabilities quickly offers good ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,445 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

117

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 20.8%, down from 26.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.3%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)	20.8%
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning	1.3%
Other	77.9%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Sthembiso Zondi

Head of Software Engineering at ronaldmariah@gmail.com

Consistent improvements in code quality and security with effective integration and reliable technical support

The features of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) that I find most useful are the suggestions received from reviewing the code. When they review the code, they provide suggestions on how to fix it, and we find those very useful from a development perspective. We use SonarQube Server's (formerly SonarQube) centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve. We use that for organizational improvement purposes. The ability to tailor metrics tracking in SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has been beneficial to my team. There are team-specific dashboards which are related to specific repositories they utilize, and we have that aggregative dashboard that shows the whole organization's performance. We can drill down per specific repository, which makes it easier for the team to improve specific things.

Read full review

Jahanzeb Feroze Khan

Assistant Manager Network Security at Institute of Business Administration, Karachi

The setup of the solution is straightforward. It involves installing the package and gaining access. It took no time at all since we deployed it on the cloud. We assigned the necessary configurations, and everything was set up and ready to go within a few seconds. I would rate the setup as a perfect ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"SonarQube is good in terms of code review and to report on basic vulnerabilities in your applications."

"SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is very stable."

"We've configured it to run on each commit, providing feedback on our software quality. ]"

"It is an easy tool that you can deploy and configure. After that you can measure the history of your obligation and integrate it with other tools like GitLab or GitHub or Azure DevOps to do quality code analysis."

"This has improved our organization because it has helped to find Security Vulnerabilities."

"Some of the most valuable features have been the latest up-to-date of the OWASP, the monitoring, the reporting, and the ease of use with the IDE plugins, in terms of integration."

"The software quality gate streamlines the product's quality."

"SonarQube is useful for controlling all of our Azure task tracking and scanning."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

"We use the tool for our websites. We have a vulnerable subdomain. The tool helps to scan it for vulnerabilities."

"I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning to others."

"It is fully automated."

"It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning provides a detailed report, identifying functions that are complex and need to be more maintainable and readable."

"All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"Having performance regression would be a helpful add on or ability to be able to do during the scan."

"The time it took for me to do the whole process was approximately two hours because I had to download, read the documentation, and do the configurations."

"I see a problem with SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) because the vulnerability assessment is continuous; if I fix some vulnerabilities today, they reappear in the next scan, and there will be completely different issues that need to be fixed."

"In terms of analysis and findings, other tools provide more in-depth insights and detailed steps to mitigate or handle issues."

"From a reporting perspective, we sometimes have problems interpreting the vulnerability scan reports. For example, if it finds a possible threat, our analysts have to manually check the provided reports, and sometimes we have issues getting all the data needed to properly verify if it's accurate or not."

"One thing to improve would be the integration. There is a steep learning curve to get it integrated."

"There are limitations to the free version that limit development options as far as languages."

"The product needs to integrate other security tools for security scanning."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

"The report customization needs to be better."

"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."

"Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments."

"They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap."

"The market is standard for vulnerability scanning, however, the posture can be improved through Tenable's prioritization engine."

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."

"The reporting has a very limited customization capability."

"The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We did not purchase a license (required for C++ support), but this option was considered."

"I do not know about the pricing as I am using the community edition, which is free. But I compared the pricing with Sigma, and it is higher than SonarQube."

"We use the tool's community edition."

"SonarQube enterprise, I am not sure of the price but from what I understand they are charging a fee. It's is not clear if it is an annual fee or a one-off."

"The development license cost is reasonable, and we've had no concerns about SonarQube when it comes to cost."

"We're using an older version because it is the open-source flavor of it and we can continue using it at no cost. We're not paying any licensing at all, which was another factor in choosing this route so that we can learn and grow with it and not be committed to licenses and other similar things. If we choose to get something else, we have to relearn, but we don't have to relicense. Basically, we're paying no license costs."

"I think comparing the product to competitors it should be less expensive."

"For the Community edition, there is no extra cost. It's totally free. The Enterprise edition, Data Center edition, and Developer edition are the paid versions."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"The pricing is okay."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Government

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	75

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

Improvements could include providing coverage reports in the free version and features related to security reports. Also, enhancing technical support would be beneficial as there is room for improv...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning as it provides us with good reports, which help improve our code base, despite the lack of financial benefits. Overall, I would rate it seven o...

See all answers

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 18% of the time

Coverity Static vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 10% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 6% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 6% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 20% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 10% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

August 2025

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

August 2025

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Also Known As

Sonar

No data available

Overview

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

September 2025

Free Report: SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.