Veracode and SonarQube Cloud are competitors in the static code analysis category. Veracode has the upper hand with its extensive security-focused features and integrations that cater to reducing security risks more robustly than SonarQube Cloud.
Features: Veracode provides comprehensive vulnerability management, dynamic analysis, and remediation tools, offering real-time scanning capabilities and API integration into DevOps pipelines. Its strengths include extensive language support and the ability to prevent false positives. SonarQube Cloud offers a focus on code quality with continuous analysis and development pipeline integrations, while lacking the breadth of security features provided by Veracode.
Room for Improvement: Veracode faces challenges with false positives and integration issues, demands for improved support for emerging languages, and enhanced reporting functionality. Users also note slow response times for large file scans. SonarQube Cloud needs more robust vulnerability detection and improved customization, as well as better onboarding and documentation to enhance user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode offers flexible deployment options including public, private, hybrid cloud, and on-premises, but faces setup challenges. Its customer service is generally highly rated for knowledgeable support. SonarQube Cloud simplifies deployment with a public cloud focus and receives positive support reviews, although improvements are needed to match Veracode's service quality.
Pricing and ROI: Veracode is a premium solution with higher prices reflecting its feature set, delivering ROI through reduced security vulnerability costs and compliance facilitation. SonarQube Cloud is seen as more cost-effective for smaller enterprises, offering a pricing model based on lines of code, making it appealing for code analysis without deep security scans.
It is easily integrable with the CI/CD pipeline and supports multiple projects with its extensive plugin options.
The product is designed for bigger clients, while smaller companies are often put aside.
The scanners of Veracode bring status of the weaknesses in the current infrastructure. It scans and provides reports regarding the servers, the network, and the applications running on those servers.
The customer service and support for SonarQube Cloud are responsive and helpful.
Integrating it into different solutions is straightforward.
They are very responsive and quick to help with queries within our scope.
They respond very quickly since security is something critical.
The responsiveness and quality of documentation from Veracode are notable compared to other tools we are currently using.
There are limitations, and it seems to have fewer capabilities than Veracode.
It has been used in multiple projects and performs well.
SonarQube Cloud is a scalable product, and I rate its scalability at seven out of ten.
Cloud solutions are easier to scale than on-premise solutions.
It has a good capacity to scale effectively.
From my team's feedback, it is almost an eight out of ten.
It is a quite stable solution.
If the Veracode server is down, we experience many issues during the scan.
I would like to see SonarQube Cloud provide more detailed solutions for fixing code issues, especially solutions related to CVEs.
I need a solution that can bring together three key areas: vulnerabilities, static scanning, and misarchitecture.
Static code analysis is good, but the product lacks dynamic code scanning capabilities, an area where Veracode excels.
If it could be integrated directly with code repositories such as Bitbucket or GitHub, without the need to create a pipeline to upload and decode code, it would simplify the code scan process significantly.
We had issues with scanning large applications. Scanning took a lot of time, so we kept it outside the DevOps pipeline to avoid delaying deployments.
Veracode can improve the licensing model as it is a bit confusing.
SonarQube Cloud is roughly equivalent in cost to Veracode, maybe a little cheaper.
From my experience, SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) is very expensive for small companies.
We used the open-source version of SonarQube Cloud for its minimum features and did not license its extensive capabilities.
It's not the most expensive solution.
If there's a security gap, you'll never know the cost or effect.
Pricing-wise, I find it a bit expensive because it's based on the number of users requesting access to Veracode.
I find SonarQube Cloud very easy to use and simple to integrate initially.
It gives precise reports compared to Coverity and has a slightly lower number of false positives.
I use SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) to check the quality of developer code and identify vulnerabilities.
It offers confidence by preventing exposure to vulnerabilities and helps ensure that we are not deploying vulnerable code into production.
The best features in Veracode include static analysis and the early detection of vulnerable libraries; it integrates with tools such as Jenkins.
The flexibility to define rules and the ability to update those rules on the fly are valuable features.
SonarQube Cloud offers static code analysis and application security testing, seamlessly integrating into CI/CD pipelines. It's a vital tool for identifying vulnerabilities and ensuring code quality before deployment.
SonarQube Cloud is widely used for its ability to integrate with tools like GitHub, Jenkins, and Bitbucket, providing critical feedback at the pull request level. It's designed to help organizations maintain clean code by acting as a quality gate. This service supports development methodologies including sprints and Kanban for ongoing vulnerability management. While appreciated for its dashboard and integration capabilities, some users find initial setup challenging and note the need for enhanced documentation. The recent addition of mono reports and microservices support offers deeper insights into security and code quality, though container testing limitations and false positives are noted drawbacks. Manual intervention is sometimes required to address detailed reporting, with external tools being necessary for comprehensive analysis. Notifications for larger teams during serious issues and streamlined integration of new features are also areas of improvement.
What are the key features of SonarQube Cloud?In specific industries, SonarQube Cloud finds application in finance and healthcare where code integrity and security are paramount. It allows teams to identify critical vulnerabilities early and ensures that software development aligns with industry regulations and standards. By continuously analyzing code, it aids organizations in deploying secure and reliable applications, fostering trust and compliance.
Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.
Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.
What are the key features of Veracode?
What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?
Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.
Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
