Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Sisense vs Splunk Enterprise Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.6
Sisense offers time-saving benefits with cost-effectiveness, but experiences vary based on existing analytics systems and initial investments.
Sentiment score
7.9
Splunk Enterprise enhances ROI by improving security, simplifying data management, and reducing costs with efficient search capabilities.
Splunk Enterprise Platform saves approximately 20 to 30 percent of my time without having to perform different actions separately.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.6
Sisense excels in customer service with expert support, responsive assistance, and a strong commitment to client success.
Sentiment score
6.6
Users have mixed opinions on Splunk's support, praising accessibility but noting delays and reliance on community solutions.
The support was very good.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Sisense is praised for scalability, though some users report performance issues with large data volumes; security concerns exist.
Sentiment score
7.9
Splunk Enterprise is highly scalable, handling large data volumes with minimal maintenance, and features effective automation and clustering.
Some products can automatically scale, but Splunk requires manual configuration changes to achieve scale, which is slightly outdated compared to modern technologies.
Splunk Enterprise Platform is scalable to some extent, which is acceptable.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Sisense is stable and reliable, with minor slowdowns during data import, but users report no major stability issues.
Sentiment score
8.3
Splunk Enterprise Platform is praised for its stability, reliability, and efficient performance, with minor issues quickly resolved.
It requires managing configuration files and processing operations manually, limiting its auto-scaling capabilities.
 

Room For Improvement

Sisense users want enhanced large dataset handling, improved dashboards, better data connectivity, and reduced costs with more customization options.
Splunk Enterprise offers powerful features but needs improvements in usability, cost, support, and handling large data volumes.
I would like to see an improvement in the live data connection, specifically making the process faster.
The deep learning capabilities need enhancing, especially on Splunk Cloud, where customers find it challenging to use deep learning tools without setting up backend computing resources.
It is complex for inexperienced cybersecurity engineers and requires experienced personnel to handle it effectively.
For future updates of Splunk Enterprise Platform, I would like to see integration by GUI.
 

Setup Cost

Sisense offers a subscription model with competitive pricing, ideal for mid-sized to large enterprises due to its robust features.
Splunk Enterprise is often seen as expensive, with high costs impacting small businesses, despite available discounts and flexible options.
There was no significant difference in pricing between Sisense and ThoughtSpot.
The pricing model is based on ingesting data sizes, not user count, and includes a free tier for up to 500 MB of daily data.
Splunk Enterprise Platform is expensive.
 

Valuable Features

Sisense offers user-friendly deployment, rapid data integration, intuitive dashboards, and advanced analytics for enhanced data insights and visualization.
Splunk Enterprise excels in data manipulation, real-time monitoring, and analytics with a user-friendly interface for compliance and integration.
It offers two ways to access data: by cubing the data or hitting it live.
Splunk's Machine Learning Toolkit is offered without charge, allowing users to incorporate machine learning in their business logic, aiding in procedures like threat hunting.
It saves time by allowing me to perform actions on a single platform instead of managing them separately.
The features that have proven most effective for real-time data analysis include parts of the platform and its automation capabilities.
 

Categories and Ranking

Sisense
Ranking in Data Visualization
15th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (19th), Cloud Analytics (6th), Reporting (16th), Embedded BI (9th)
Splunk Enterprise Platform
Ranking in Data Visualization
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
IT Alerting and Incident Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Visualization category, the mindshare of Sisense is 2.9%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Enterprise Platform is 1.7%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Visualization
 

Featured Reviews

Wiboon Thabsuwan - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps businesses save time and offers good integration features
I would say that using Sisense on Linux's platform might not be advantageous for everyone. I am more familiar with Windows than Linux. With Windows, the system performs very fast. Even if your data size consists of like 10,00,00,000 loads or whatever, it works very fast. When using Sisense, it is better to have some people with a very good understanding of Linux. I need more technical people who understand about Linux OS. Only two people would be enough to operate the tool.
UzairKhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Delivers financial benefits and operational efficiency with impactful data analytics capabilities
My advice for those looking to implement Splunk Enterprise Platform is to know the product well and have hands-on workshops or create a lab to gain complete knowledge before proceeding. Regarding maintenance, it does not require much as it is on-premises. Overall, I would rate Splunk Enterprise Platform an eight.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Visualization solutions are best for your needs.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
15%
University
7%
Government
5%
Hospitality Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Insurance Company
11%
Healthcare Company
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Sisense?
The solution's technical support team is good.
What needs improvement with Sisense?
I would like to see an improvement in the live data connection, specifically making the process faster. Additionally, incorporating more self-service capabilities would benefit the product.
What is your primary use case for Sisense?
I was looking into some of our business operations with tow truck companies. I focused on evaluating turnaround times for tow trucks to arrive on-site for accidents and how long it took them to cle...
What do you like most about Splunk Enterprise Platform?
The most valuable features of the solution are the load balancing technique, the forwarding technique, and SSL certification.
What needs improvement with Splunk Enterprise Platform?
For future updates of Splunk Enterprise Platform, I would like to see integration by GUI. The integration should be improved with the UI.
What is your primary use case for Splunk Enterprise Platform?
The use cases for Splunk Enterprise Platform ( /products/splunk-enterprise-platform-reviews ) vary depending on the specific scenario. Splunk Enterprise Platform ( /products/splunk-enterprise-platf...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ebay, WIX, Wave Accounting, ESPN.com, Magellan Luxury Hotel, Paylogic, Sony, Merck, EDA, One Hour Translation, NASA, Plastic Jungle, Philips, Yahoo
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Sisense vs. Splunk Enterprise Platform and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.