SAS Access vs WhereScape RED comparison

SAS and WhereScape are both solutions in the Data Integration category. SAS is ranked #56, while WhereScape is ranked #46. SAS holds a 0.3% mindshare in DI, compared to WhereScape’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SAS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of WhereScape users who would recommend it.

SAS Access

Read 3 SAS Access reviews

273 Views
174 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WhereScape RED

Read 15 WhereScape RED reviews

1,423 Views
873 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

SAS Access

WhereScape RED

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

WhereScape RED and SAS Access serve the data management and analytics market. WhereScape RED leads with its integration and automation capabilities, whereas SAS Access stands out with its analytical prowess and connectivity options.

Features: WhereScape RED offers automation tools for streamlined workflows, rapid development with drag-and-drop functionality, and efficient management of data integration tasks. SAS Access is known for its robust analytical capabilities, extensive library support, and connectivity to various data sources, meeting complex analytical demands.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WhereScape RED is praised for an easy deployment process that cuts down implementation time and comes with responsive customer service to assist with setup. SAS Access provides a comprehensive deployment model with detailed documentation and support, though it may need more setup time and resources.

Pricing and ROI: WhereScape RED is competitively priced, focusing on delivering quick ROI through reduced time to value with its automation features. SAS Access could require a higher initial investment, justified by its advanced analytics and connectivity, offering potential long-term value for organizations with extensive data processing needs.

To learn more, read our detailed SAS Access vs. WhereScape RED Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SAS Access vs. WhereScape RED

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAS Access

Ranking in Data Integration

56th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WhereScape RED

Ranking in Data Integration

46th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of SAS Access is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WhereScape RED is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Robert Heck

Co Owner at Hecht und Heck GmbH

The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible

I rate the solution eight out of ten. The number of people required to maintain the solution is dependent on the other applications running. The solution in itself does not require a lot of maintenance. The solution is flexible and I recommend it when you have more complex applications with special requirements.

Read full review

reviewer1618884

BI Analyst DW Architect at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees

Quick to set up, flexible, and stable

The scheduling part I don't like due to the fact that it allows you to schedule as a parent and child and other things, however, the error trackability has to be a little more user-friendly. It's also not user-friendly in the sense that it loads all the jobs and there are not enough filters so that it doesn't need to load everything. If the job fails, you don't get any type of alert or email. It would be ideal if there was some sort of automated alert message. Technical support isn't the best. It would be ideal if we understood how to do it in a card exception regarding exclusion, where the card is captured separately rather than filling the whole process on the data inbound side. Certain workloads like this are organized in such a way where you seem to be doubling the work as opposed to streamlining the process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."

"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."

"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."

"Support is absolutely excellent, efficient, and timely."

"I found the initial setup very easy."

"RED has provided us the ability to integrate, stage, and transform data from diverse sources into an enterprise-grade data warehouse which meets the needs of my organization, but it also enables us to easily and quickly make ETL or DW changes."

"Quickly develops a data warehouse for our organization with documentation and can track back/forward features."

"Their support staff are very knowledgeable, courteous, and professional. I feel their support staff go above and beyond to assure their customers are satisfied."

"I like the data vault implementations."

"RED generates comprehensive documentation and regenerates it as quickly as things changes, but it also provides impact documentation."

"It has a built-in automatic scheduling environment."

More WhereScape RED pros

Cons

"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."

"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."

"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."

"They need a more robust support center. It has been a bit difficult to find solutions to problems that are out-of-the-box."

"The scheduled jobs which are run by the WhereScape scheduler seem to be a strangely separate animal. Unlike all other WhereScape objects, jobs cannot be added to WhereScape projects. Also, unlike all other objects, jobs also cannot be deleted using a WhereScape deployment application."

"Technical support isn't the best."

"The solution can be a little more user-friendly on enterprise-level where people use it."

"Project-based searching of data objects in the data warehouse browser needs to be improved."

"Customization could be better."

"Improve the object renaming ability (it works, but it could be more automated)."

"It could use a tool to diagnose what is missing from the environment for WhereScape to install successfully."

More WhereScape RED cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing and licensing are expensive."

"The pricing model is complex and is based on modular packages as well as the size of the applicable environment."

"Our company purchased a corporate unlimited license."

"ROI is at least 10 times."

"Factor in the price of specialized consulting who know this product. They're hard to find and expensive."

"Speed to market of a warehouse solution at a relatively inexpensive price point."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Teradata vs SAS Access

Compared 100% of the time

More SAS Access Competitors

Azure Data Factory vs WhereScape RED

Compared 13% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs WhereScape RED

Compared 13% of the time

dbt vs WhereScape RED

Compared 11% of the time

SSIS vs WhereScape RED

Compared 11% of the time

erwin Data Catalog by Quest vs WhereScape RED

Compared 10% of the time

More WhereScape RED Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

June 2025

Download SAS Access product report

Buyer's Guide

WhereScape RED

June 2025

Download WhereScape RED product report

Also Known As

SAS/Access

No data available

Overview

SAS/ACCESS is an out-of-the-box solution for integrating SAS and third-party databases. You can read, write and update data regardless of the database or platform. Because the data appears native to SAS, there is no need to learn Structured Query Language (SQL) or any other database-specific query languages.

SAS

WhereScape is data warehouse software that automates the Data Warehouse lifecycle. From implementation to maintenance, WhereScape will ensure your data warehouse projects are completed up to 5x faster than manual coding.

WhereScape

Sample Customers

Los Angeles County, West Midlands Police, Credit Guarantee Corporation, Canada Post, Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty

British American Tobacco, Cornell University, Allianz Benelux, Finnair, Solarwinds and many more.

Buyer's Guide

SAS Access vs. WhereScape RED

May 2025

Free Report: SAS Access vs. WhereScape RED

Find out what your peers are saying about SAS Access vs. WhereScape RED and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAS Access vs. WhereScape RED report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.