RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs Transmit Security comparison

RSA Identity Governance and...

Read 4 Transmit Security reviews

1,851 Views
666 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and Transmit Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Identity Management (IM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Transmit Security Report (Updated: June 2026).

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Transmit Security

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

RSA Identity Governance and...

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

21st

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Transmit Security

Ranking in Identity Management (IM)

24th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (28th), Access Management (22nd), Passwordless Authentication (5th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is 1.1%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Transmit Security is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Management (IM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle	1.1%
Transmit Security	0.7%
Other	98.2%

Identity Management (IM)

Featured Reviews

Harshul Nayak

Senior Project Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Streamline identity lifecycle management with intuitive interfaces and robust policy features

The functions of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle, especially the IGA, are quite strong with their custom forms and workflows integrated. The user interface is very friendly and easy to use, making it a good product overall. However, it still has to be on-premise and the cloud version is not easily accessible, as dedicated instances are required and machines cannot be shared as multi-tenant for various customers. The advanced policy features of RSA definitely help in defining certain policies such as segregation of duties. That's particularly useful along with creating different access reviews. Regarding access control in simplifying access management, RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle has strong foundations of groups and roles, which help in defining all policies very easily. This makes it very easy to integrate with other access management tools or privileged access management tools.

Read full review

reviewer2804310

Lead Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Journey orchestration has improved fraud prevention but still needs shared rules and better usability

The main improvement needed is that with the tool, you have to build rules for each and every application. There is no common place where you can write the rules and use that rule for all your applications, which is missing. This is a big feature that is missing compared to the other products in the market. Additionally, the SDKs, Journey Player, and other components are not business-friendly, so you really have to be technical to get into it and do those things. A non-technical person would find it really hard to implement and learn things inside Transmit Security. Even though it requires less coding, you still have to have some technical people in your team to really write the rules and integrate those rules into your application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the security, in particular, the One Time Password support."

"It improved security."

"All of the features in this product are good and this is a product that I recommend."

"With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes."

"Roles, connectors for provisioning and re-accreditation or reviews help greatly to govern user access."

"Never - one thing I can say about RSA is that the boxes are stable and solid."

"The data collection is excellent and easy to do."

"Soft and hard tokens for two factor authentication has been introduced."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle pros

"Transmit Security has played a major role for our organization, especially in the authentication areas."

"Transmit Security has positively impacted my organization by improving the development of workflows in order to help the user experience."

"Transmit interface is flexible and user-friendly, which is important for our workload. Switching from one authentication code to multiple exposure or two-factor authentication (MFA) is seamless."

"Transmit Security has impacted my organization positively because it is reassuring to know that we are building on top of a trusted tool, and we do not rely on developers that could make mistakes, and because it is an authentication platform, that could be detrimental."

Cons

"We were excited that the self-provision feature was now built into the box but disappointed at the implementation."

"RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle could improve out-of-the-box customization."

"If you use the appliance version then it won't handle a huge database volume."

"It could be a little more flexible with the installation of the product."

"The user interface and workflow need improvement, and more connectors would help."

"This product is missing a lot of features which other competitors are providing. One of the key features that are missing right now is risk scoring. Additionally, there is not much scope for customization - everything is hard-coded and predefined, so it does not allow the developers to make many modifications."

"As the size becomes larger, the collections and unifications of the IDs process become quite slow, which can be improved further."

"There are scalability issues. This product does not scale very well. It is not a good product for load balancing / active–active architecture."

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle cons

"The customer support varies, but overall, we are satisfied."

"The main improvement needed is that with the tool, you have to build rules for each and every application."

"The scalability of Transmit Security is a little bit tricky. It is not easy to scale and depends on the complexity of my workflows and how many users I am going to support."

"Pricing is an area where Transmit Security could improve. The pricing needs to be more competitive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing varies based on user count/number of modules you need."

"We are using the cloud platform, but we don't find it compatible to be served as a multi-tenant platform. This is a large drawback. It becomes expensive because it is then an all-dedicated solution. You have to have a separate tenant for each client, which increases the cost. The overall unit pricing can be less expensive than how it is right now."

"I rate the product's price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

There is room for improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle. As the size becomes larger, the collections and unifications of the IDs process become quite slow, which can be improved fu...

What is your primary use case for RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

We provide RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle as a service, mainly to oversee the digital identity lifecycle, from the initiation to the off-boarding at the end of that digital identity. Our cli...

What advice do you have for others considering RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

Overall, I would rate RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle at an eight out of ten.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Transmit Security?

I have heard that pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Transmit Security are a little bit expensive, but I am not in charge of the budget in my team, so I cannot answer that with complete certai...

What needs improvement with Transmit Security?

I think Transmit Security can be improved by creating features that would allow the replacing of other companies such as Onfido. For example, if it would allow you to sign in by taking a selfie and...

What is your primary use case for Transmit Security?

My main use case for Transmit Security is access management and identity journey coordination. A specific example of how I use Transmit Security for access management and identity journey coordinat...

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

One Identity Manager vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 7% of the time

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Identity Governance and Administration vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Compared 6% of the time

More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Competitors

Auth0 Platform vs Transmit Security

Compared 15% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs Transmit Security

Compared 13% of the time

EVOLVEUM midPoint vs Transmit Security

Compared 9% of the time

ForgeRock vs Transmit Security

Compared 8% of the time

TeamViewer vs Transmit Security

Compared 8% of the time

More Transmit Security Competitors

Product Reports

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Download RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle product report

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle report

Download Transmit Security product report

Also Known As

SecurID

BindID, FlexID, WorkID

Overview

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle aids efficient identity management, offering synchronization with Active Directory for seamless setups and enhancing security with two-factor authentication.

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle streamlines identity management from initiation to off-boarding, focusing on role-based access control and application integration. Despite requiring on-premise deployment, it provides advanced policy features for segregation of duties and access management. Performance issues arise with large file sizes, and there is limited integration with some third-party applications. Users benefit from custom forms, workflows, and an intuitive portal that eases the user's experience. While improvements are needed in database integration and multi-tenant capabilities, the solution remains popular for its auditing and certification support.

What are the key features of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?

Synchronization with Active Directory: Facilitates quick setups.
Role-based access control: Eases application access management.
Custom forms and workflows: Enhances user interaction.
Advanced policy features: Supports compliance needs.
Two-factor authentication: Increases security levels.
Access certification and auditing: Ensures efficient data management.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Enhanced Security: With layered authentication methods.
Efficient Data Collection: For streamlined operations.
Improved Access Governance: Through streamlined user role management.
Easy Identity Management: From onboarding to off-boarding events.

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is utilized in sectors managing digital identities, with deployment options on AWS, either on the cloud or on-premise. It assists organizations in handling joiner, mover, and leaver processes, adapting to business-specific needs while adding authentication layers to network access.

RSA

Transmit Security's cloud-based platform provides comprehensive Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) services, streamlining identity and access solutions with innovative functionalities.

Transmit Security delivers a robust suite of CIAM services, focusing on identity orchestration for automated access control, detection and response for risk management, and identity management with features like single sign-on and verifications. Offering authentication services including multi-factor options, the platform ensures data validation, enhancing accuracy and fraud prevention with minimal technical complexity through its low-code approach.

What are the key features of Transmit Security?

FlexID: Tailored user experiences for identity management.
Multi-factor Authentication: Offers secure, passwordless logins.
AuthScript: Simplified programming for application flows.
Graphic Interface: Facilitates workflow development and customization.
Journey Orchestration: Enhances user interaction and fraud prevention with low-code solutions.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Customization: Allows intricate configurations for specific needs.
Security: Protects high-risk transactions and data accuracy.
User Experience: Simplified application workflows enhance interactions.
Technical Efficiency: Backend journey coordination reduces recompilation needs.

Transmit Security is widely implemented for seamless user application and access management across industries needing secure and efficient identity coordination. In sectors like finance, it helps manage customer identities and protect high-risk transactions such as bank transfers, leveraging technologies like biometrics and RESTful API integrations, although pricing and technical complexity can be challenging for some enterprises.

Sample Customers

NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center

Mitgate, Telepass, Metro Bank, Santander

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle vs. Transmit Security