

SUSE Linux Enterprise and Rocky Linux are key competitors in the Linux distribution category, focusing on enterprise and server environments. SUSE Linux Enterprise seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive support and integration capabilities, particularly with Oracle and SAP.
Features: SUSE Linux Enterprise shines with its administration tools like YaST, which simplify server management. It offers robust security and integrates effortlessly with SAP HANA and Oracle. The extensive documentation and ease of upgrades further enhance its appeal. Rocky Linux's strengths include being a reliable CentOS replacement with strong community support, full RHEL compatibility, and efficient clustering capabilities.
Room for Improvement: SUSE Linux Enterprise could benefit from enhanced cloud integration, separating free and paid software channels for improved security, and reducing response times for support. Pricing remains a concern for some users. Rocky Linux, being newer, might lack some familiar software components from CentOS and needs to enhance Windows Active Directory integration. Clarifying its core identity could also be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SUSE Linux Enterprise provides robust deployment options across various cloud environments, though it can have a steep learning curve. Its customer service is noted for responsiveness. Rocky Linux is easier to deploy in on-premises and hybrid environments, primarily supported by the community. While paid support is less frequent, its RHEL compatibility often reduces the need for support.
Pricing and ROI: SUSE Linux Enterprise is seen as having competitive pricing, particularly for SAP deployments, offering a high ROI despite support costs. Rocky Linux is a cost-effective choice with minimal overhead, providing features at little to no cost and maintaining functionality similar to CentOS. Both platforms offer distinct financial benefits suitable for varied business needs.
When it comes to return on investment, a lot of money is saved since we moved from a purchased license to the open source provided by Rocky Linux.
ROI has been good as we have significant open source community involvement.
I have seen a return on investment since there was definitely money saved at the time due to the lack of need for licensing since Rocky is available openly.
I have seen a return on investment by switching our clusters from on-prem to Azure public cloud, using our same Bring Your Own Licenses, which saved costs on licensing.
The support level is extraordinary, providing on-time assistance.
We have not yet needed to contact a vendor regarding Rocky Linux.
Even if we raise a support ticket, we receive a resolution or a reply from the team within two business days.
SUSE Linux Enterprise provides a stable, secure, and well-supported platform for enterprise workloads, with powerful management tools and robust support for clustering, cloud, and containers.
The customer support is good; whenever we have opened a case, they have provided detailed explanations of the issues and resolutions.
I rate the customer service 10 out of 10 because SUSE has 24/7 availability support, extended support, security, multi-Linux distribution support, upgradation, and everything is user-friendly.
Even if the server is not responding and we want to attach the volume on another instance or a temporary instance, it is very easy and straightforward with no hiccups.
It has handled growth or changing needs well.
The scalability is quite good, though there are some issues with Rocky Linux.
Its scalability is quite good since we are using Azure, which allows us to easily scale up or down our resources as needed.
SUSE Linux Enterprise is widely recognized for its strong scalability, making it suitable for organizations of all sizes, from small businesses to global enterprises.
Rocky Linux is stable, scalable, and it is very much easier to use.
Rocky Linux is stable.
When HANA is utilized by many applications, I notice that while utilization does increase, we have never faced lagging or server unresponsiveness.
I would rate stability for SUSE Linux Enterprise an eight out of ten.
It is based on customer requirements, as they might want to use Rocky Linux or Ubuntu, depending on their needs.
Rocky Linux could be improved by having more integration with Kubernetes.
Currently, it takes more than one month to release a new package or kernel, so speeding that up would help reduce reported vulnerability remediations.
Security is a top concern, and further strengthening default security policies, simplifying compliance management, and integrating advanced vulnerability management tools would be a valuable improvement.
The software manager was different, making it challenging to install certain applications.
The license we subscribed to should carry over within the same instance family.
We switched to Rocky Linux because of the license price, and in our business, we don't need to have a higher cost as that is not a good idea.
There is no extra cost for a license if we are purchasing Rocky Linux from the AWS Marketplace.
Rocky Linux is free, and I can download it and deploy it in whatever environment I have, whether it be H3C, VMware, or Hyper-V.
Upgrading an instance results in overlapping or double subscription fees.
I would rate pricing for SUSE Linux Enterprise considering one is a high price and ten is a low price.
The licensing cost is a bit high.
Rocky Linux has positively impacted my organization, specifically through cost savings, because we did not have to buy any licenses or extra licenses of other distros, such as Oracle or Red Hat.
For production deployment, Rocky Linux is a great choice because it offers full RHEL compatibility without licensing costs, along with strong community support.
Since migrating to Rocky Linux, I've seen specific outcomes such as improved security because CentOS stopped the project, and security patches aren't being released.
SUSE Linux had a clean user interface, which was a valuable feature for me.
It has a stable and reliable OS.
The LVM is very easy to configure, along with simple disk scanning compared to other systems.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Rocky Linux | 14.3% |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise | 6.4% |
| Other | 79.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
Rocky Linux is a robust and secure enterprise-grade operating system designed as a drop-in replacement for CentOS. Its primary use case is to provide a stable and reliable platform for organizations to run their critical workloads and applications.
SUSE Linux Enterprise offers features like YaST for server management, seamless integration with Oracle and SAP, and a robust security setup. Renowned for stability, it efficiently supports workstations, SAP workloads, and cloud migrations across diverse industries.
SUSE Linux Enterprise is known for its lightweight design, high performance, and ease of installation. Its flexible architecture supports extensive documentation and efficient patching. The system uses the BTRFS file system for effective virtualization, and community support is significant. However, challenges include package updates causing conflicts, difficult initial setup and software management, high pricing, and support response times. Improvements in security compliance, cloud integration, hardware compatibility, and documentation are also needed.
What are SUSE Linux Enterprise's important features?
What benefits should users expect from using SUSE Linux Enterprise?
Industries like healthcare and banking use SUSE Linux Enterprise for secure transactions and structured application deployment. It is also a choice for organizations involved in testing, automation, and web development, offering support for SAP HANA integration and facilitating cloud migrations.
We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.