Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Rapid7 AppSpider vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

Rapid7 and Spirent are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Rapid7 is ranked #32, while Spirent is ranked #31. Rapid7 holds a 0.5% mindshare in SAST, compared to Spirent’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Rapid7 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.
Rapid7 AppSpider
Read 14 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews
  • 865 Views
  • 137 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Spirent CyberFlood
Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood reviews
  • 538 Views
  • 248 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Spirent CyberFlood and Rapid7 AppSpider compete in cybersecurity testing. Spirent CyberFlood stands out with competitive pricing and efficient customer support, while Rapid7 AppSpider shines with a strong feature set, making it worth its higher cost.

Features: Spirent CyberFlood offers comprehensive traffic emulation, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. Rapid7 AppSpider provides robust vulnerability detection, integration capabilities, and a superior feature set tailored for diverse technical needs.

Room for Improvement: Spirent CyberFlood users note the need for better reporting, enhanced analytics, and user interface improvements. Rapid7 AppSpider users seek faster performance, improved manual testing capabilities, and more intuitive interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spirent CyberFlood offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Rapid7 AppSpider is complex to deploy but is supported by comprehensive service structures, aligning with users needing detailed support.

Pricing and ROI: Spirent CyberFlood is attractive for its lower setup costs and quick return on investment. Rapid7 AppSpider, despite higher initial costs, is seen as a worthwhile long-term investment with its price justified by advanced technology.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Rapid7 AppSpider vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Rapid7 AppSpider vs. Spirent CyberFlood
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 AppSpider
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
32nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Spirent CyberFlood
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
31st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (47th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Rapid7 AppSpider is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Rizwan-Alam - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy automated web app scanning, but gives many false positives and isn't always stable
One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions. This is the main aspect that I hope to see Rapid7 improve on. Beyond reducing false positives, I would also like to see them implement better reporting features, particularly in the executive summary type of reports which need to be user-friendly and easily understood by non-technical people. The recommendations and solutions on these reports could always be improved to make them more relevant, too. Lastly, the stability isn't that great, and sometimes it becomes non-responsive. I feel like the stability of the application is very average and currently needs more work.
Read full review
Jos Badimo - PeerSpot reviewer
Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance
The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I like most about AppSpider is that it's easy to use and its automated scan gives me all the details I need to know when it comes to vulnerabilities and their solutions."
"The setup is usually straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 AppSpider is the vulnerability reporting data. Additionally, the data is reported in a convenient way rather than seeing them as a PDF. We are able to generate all the reports exactly what we want in a flexible way."
"One of the most valuable features of AppSpider is its broad range of authentication identification, which is a key reason for its utilization."
"Rapid7 AppSpider is good at managing different applications. It uses applets and generates reports to cover the PCA/GDPR compliance requirements."
"It scans all the components developed within a web application."
"I like the ability the product has to detect vulnerabilities quickly, when it has been released in our environment, then displaying them to us."
"AppSpider's most valuable feature is reporting - everything is stored in the local database so it can be sent to other machines."
More Rapid7 AppSpider pros
"CyberFlood is flexible."
"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."
"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."
"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."
"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."
"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."
 

Cons

"The tech support is responsive but issues remain unresolved."
"The dashboard and interface are crucial and they need some improvement."
"The performance of the solution could improve. When I compare the speed it is slower than others on the market. There are some tricks we use to help speed up the solution."
"One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions."
"The enterprise interface is too simple. It should be more customizable."
"The product needs to be able to scale for large companies, like ours. We have millions of IP addresses that need to be scanned, and the scalability is not great."
"The solution is too slow. It could take a full day to scan. Competitors are much faster."
"There are some glitches with stability, and it is an area for improvement."
More Rapid7 AppSpider cons
"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."
"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."
"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."
"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."
"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."
"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."
"The price is pretty fair."
"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."
"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."
"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."
"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?
The price is not high, but for Japanese customers, localization may incur additional costs.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?
For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Rapid7 AppSpider?
Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?
The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?
I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Spirent CyberFlood?
The language barrier and time difference pose significant issues with customer support. The price is competitive. The biggest benefits I find are test assurance, the reliability of the test results...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider Logo
Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider
Compared 43% of the time
Acunetix vs Rapid7 AppSpider Logo
Acunetix vs Rapid7 AppSpider
Compared 10% of the time
Invicti vs Rapid7 AppSpider Logo
Invicti vs Rapid7 AppSpider
Compared 7% of the time
OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 AppSpider Logo
OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 AppSpider
Compared 7% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 AppSpider Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 AppSpider
Compared 7% of the time
More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors
Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood Logo
Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood
Compared 76% of the time
Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood Logo
Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood
Compared 24% of the time
More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Rapid7 AppSpider
June 2025
Rapid7 AppSpider reportDownload Rapid7 AppSpider product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
June 2025
Spirent CyberFlood reportDownload Spirent CyberFlood product report
 

Also Known As

AppSpider
CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
 

Overview

SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.

Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.

Rapid7

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Spirent
 

Sample Customers

Microsoft
Digicel
Buyer's Guide
Rapid7 AppSpider vs. Spirent CyberFlood
June 2025
Free Report: Rapid7 AppSpider vs. Spirent CyberFlood
Find out what your peers are saying about Rapid7 AppSpider vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Rapid7 AppSpider vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.