Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Qualys and Tenable are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Qualys is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.2, while Tenable is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9. Qualys holds a 0.9% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Qualys users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Tenable Vulnerability Management and Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management both compete in the cybersecurity space, particularly in asset visibility and vulnerability management, and each has its strengths. Tenable holds an edge in comprehensive vulnerability scanning and integration capabilities, while Qualys excels in asset visibility, tagging, and remediation with its extensive cloud integrations.

Features: Tenable provides robust vulnerability scanning, stability, and seamless integration with third-party tools, making it favorable for enterprise-level assessments. It offers efficient management tools and detailed environment analysis. Qualys stands out with exceptional asset visibility, precise tagging, and management of end-of-life assets. Its emphasis on cloud integration and comprehensive inventory features makes it ideal for diverse environments and automation.

Room for Improvement: Tenable could improve in dashboard customization, user interface intuitiveness, and pricing models more suited for SMBs. Integration of various databases for more detailed reporting is also needed. Qualys needs enhancements in user interface consistency, dynamic tagging features, and precision in asset visibility and tagging. Broader third-party tool integrations would benefit various users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer flexible deployment options, including public, hybrid, private cloud, and on-premises. Tenable can improve its customer support as users report response delays, whereas Qualys is praised for its quick and responsive customer service, proving beneficial for those requiring immediate assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable is often seen as expensive but justified by strong ROI through effective vulnerability management. In contrast, Qualys is competitively priced, providing excellent value with its VMDR service. Both struggle with pricing for smaller organizations, where Tenable could explore pay-as-you-go models, and Qualys could offer more accessible packages.

To learn more, read our detailed Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 855,347 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Zafran Security is 0.7%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 0.9%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 5.9%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

Scott Frederick

Director of Vulnerability Management at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Well-integrated with our vulnerability scanning utilities and efficient in asset tagging and identification

Our favorite features are the tagging and the ability to quickly find assets in the portal. Additionally, I do like the fact that Qualys CSAM is integrated with the rest of our vulnerability scanning utilities. We use the full suite from Qualys. The fact that it is integrated makes it very easy to understand. It shares tagging information with VMDR. That is very nice. Qualys CSAM has discovered assets not previously covered by our vulnerability management program. Primarily, if we have assets without vulnerabilities, they become less visible, but Qualys CSAM alerts us to them because they have IP addresses and are attached to our network. It could discover everything from printers to servers to endpoints. It could discover UPSs, network devices, and across all operating systems. It discovers our security badge readers and digital signage. We have to feed that the IP address ranges, but beyond that, it finds everything in our internal network. We were able to realize its benefits within the first quarter of installing it. We did have to take some time to learn it and understand how to operationally leverage what it was telling us, but it was very quick. In addition to vulnerabilities, Qualys CSAM helps identify other risk factors to a degree. For instance, we can see if servers or assets have incorrect naming standards. We have our network segmented into development model, test, and production, and we have server naming standards that identify which management they should be in. If a production server has the naming standard of a development model server, we can find that. That is one area we have used it for. We are not fully using TruRisk, but we are using the Qualys detection score that is central to our corporate risk prioritization approach. It has completely replaced our homegrown one.

Read full review

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Streamlines vulnerability management with excellent reporting and potential AI integration

Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting. It allows me to easily fetch and schedule reports. The software's discovery feature aids in strengthening our security posture. The single-sensor installation process on various operating systems is smooth, unlike Rapid7, which requires different versions for separate systems. Furthermore, Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management has helped to improve the organization's security posture significantly."

"I would rate the Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten for its overall performance."

"I recommend Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management due to its superior asset information collection capabilities, including comprehensive hardware and software inventorying."

"Qualys CSAM helps find all the assets. It categorizes information based on various criteria such as host and tenant version. It provides in-depth visibility into both hardware and software."

"I would rate Qualys CSAM a ten out of ten."

"Authorized and unauthorized software visibility is the best feature for me. It helps me understand security controls on our network and where we lack visibility. With a single security tool, we are able to get an extensive list."

"The best feature is asset discovery through their cloud agent or IP-based scanning."

"With Qualys CSAM, we can see which assets have critical application vulnerabilities. This feature helps us prioritize and address these vulnerabilities more efficiently."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pros

"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."

"It is a very, very user-friendly tool...The setup is easy"

"The initial setup is straightforward so long as your infrastructure, components, and networks are in place."

"It has greatly impacted us by providing asset visibility."

"You can customize each point in new scans."

"It's a recommended tool for penetration testers because it's effective for that purpose."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"The dashboard is pretty intuitive, and it lets you do a drill-down analysis of each vulnerability. That is something that brings a lot of value to the organization."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"Some areas that would be helpful are more comprehensive tagging and the ability to set up better dynamic rules."

"One improvement that they can make in the EASM module is the scan frequency. After EASM is configured the first time, it allows you to do the complete configuration, but if you want to reconfigure it, it will not ask or provide any option for scan frequency. For that, you need to raise a case with Qualys and talk to the Qualys team."

"All required features are available in Qualys CSAM. However, it would be helpful if Qualys CSAM started incorporating AI models. An inclusion of threat details for AI and LLM-related risks would be beneficial."

"The UI needs improvement as it can become overwhelming after prolonged use."

"In my opinion, the area that needs improvement is the role-based access control (RBAC). The access privilege management needs to be more robust and streamlined to enhance user access management. Additionally, improvements to the user interface could be beneficial."

"From the user experience perspective, we need a simpler interface and reduced complexity in certain features, particularly with the Qualys Query Language."

"The Qualys CAPS service requires further exploration and improvement, particularly in its handling of protocols and reactivity with MAC and IP addresses for CAP agents."

"We have had challenges modifying the agent configuration. Particularly, when we want to change the tenant that the agent is pointing to, we have had difficulties making that reliable and working properly."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management cons

"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."

"I'd like to see them improve their support."

"The product is a bit expensive."

"The solution must provide penetration testing."

"The reporting was never great in Tenable Vulnerability Management, so, in my company, we imported all the data into Ivanti RiskSense to start using it for reporting."

"The product could be easier to set up on the cloud."

"The one drawback that we have found is the reports."

"The solution is a bit slow."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Qualys is competitively priced for its features. Its pricing is suitable for large organizations with more than 4,000 assets, but for smaller organizations with few assets, such as banks, the costs might be high. They should come up with packages that are suitable for small organizations."

"The Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management pricing is well-aligned with our usage."

"The pricing is fair. I would love to see the price come down a little bit, but we do get a lot of value out of it. We are squeezing every ounce of value we can out of the tool."

"Qualys offers excellent value for money."

"The cost for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is high."

"The pricing for Qualys CSAM is nominal."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can be expensive, especially if we already have VMDR."

"It is cost-effective because, in a single tool, we are getting everything. All the solutions come in a single license or price."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pricing and cost advice

"Tenable charges around $40 per device."

"The solution is not too expensive."

"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."

"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."

"Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."

"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."

"A yearly payment has to be made toward the solution's licensing costs."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

855,347 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

The current pricing of Zafran Security is fair overall. They were good to work with to accommodate our organization w...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvement...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

Zafran Security is helping reduce the amount of critical vulnerabilities in our environments that require prompt reme...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, c...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

The deployment is somewhat complicated and could be made more user-friendly for most users. It is currently not user-...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

We use it to identify all our assets, including those on our premises, cloud, and remote environments. It continuousl...

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io. My current client doesn't have access to it. Howeve...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 43% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 18% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 11% of the time

Nucleus vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Amazon Inspector vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 13% of the time

Armis vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 11% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 7% of the time

Axonius vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 7% of the time

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 20% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

June 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

May 2025

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report

Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

May 2025

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tenable.io

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides advanced real-time asset visibility, dynamic tagging, and External Attack Surface Management. It streamlines asset discovery and management using cloud agents and IP-based scanning, enhancing risk management and software lifecycle tracking.

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management offers a comprehensive solution for managing asset inventories and tracking software lifecycle states. It facilitates network visibility and supports zero-day vulnerability solutions, enhancing security posture through efficient monitoring. Users benefit from its cloud-based interface, which provides in-depth asset configurations and insights. Key features include automated vulnerability scanning and unauthorized software management, reducing manual efforts. The platform also emphasizes the importance of timely remediation and ongoing risk mitigation across multiple environments. Despite its strengths, users note the need for enhanced integration with additional CMDBs beyond ServiceNow, as well as cost efficiency improvements. Requests also include better report customization, more scan control, and a simplified UI.

What are the key features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

Real-time Visibility: Offers continuous insight into asset status and condition.
Dynamic Tagging: Allows for flexible organization and assessment of assets.
External Attack Surface Management: Identifies potential threats from external sources.
Automated Vulnerability Scanning: Reduces manual scanning efforts and identifies vulnerabilities instantly.
Unauthorized Software Management: Detects and manages software not approved for use.
Asset Purge Rule: Automates the removal of obsolete assets from the inventory.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Security Posture: Gains stronger defense through effective asset monitoring.
Efficient Risk Management: Identifies threats quickly, enabling timely resolutions.
Improved Compliance: Assists in meeting industry standards and regulations.
Reduced Manual Effort: Automates repetitive tasks, saving time and resources.
Comprehensive Insight: Provides detailed data for informed decision making.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management enhances asset control by offering visibility into hardware and software configurations. It aids in maintaining security compliance and identifying unauthorized software, crucial for sectors with strict regulatory requirements.

Qualys

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

June 2025

Free Report: Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

855,347 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.