We performed a comparison between Portnox Clear and Portnox CORE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the fact that you can take your device anywhere and still have that visibility from anywhere because it's agent-based."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"The solution has a valuable reporting feature."
"It's agentless, and it's scalable."
"The technical support is top-notch."
"This is a self-sufficient network monitoring and security product that saves time and employee resources."
"The most important feature is that this solution is agentless. So, you don't have to install any agents on endpoints."
"Technical support was very helpful when we needed them."
"It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components."
"The product is a valuable solution within zero-trust architecture, enhancing network security and visibility."
"It's a stable product."
"As there are no agents in Portnox Clear, the customers of the product cannot download any agents on their devices, making them unsure if the product offers proper security."
"I believe there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of integration."
"From a resource perspective, the OEM can do better in terms of resource utilization."
"The product should consider more integration with vendors like Huawei. It should also improve visibility. The solution should offer a partner portal that can provide customers training on the in and out of the solution."
"The integration between Portnox CORE and Portnox CLEAR can be better. These are two different systems, and there is no unique console for both devices. Portnox CORE is agentless, whereas Portnox CLEAR is not agentless."
"We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE."
"Portnox CORE can improve on support for unmanaged switches (or hubs) and other brands of network devices. These kinds of devices are still in use in organisations, especially SMEs who cannot afford to buy a managed switch."
"One of the things for the on-premise is that sometimes you click on it and it takes a while for it to respond."
"Now, the way security is viewed, maybe including something like AI, to automate some of the things that are required to be done would be great."
"It might be beneficial to improve the ease of integrating the product with firewalls."
"The solution did have some stability issues, however, all I had to do was restart it."
Portnox Clear is ranked 13th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews while Portnox CORE is ranked 12th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 14 reviews. Portnox Clear is rated 7.6, while Portnox CORE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Portnox Clear writes "An affordable tool to monitor routers and access points". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portnox CORE writes "Simple UI, easy deployment but slow authentication times for devices". Portnox Clear is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, whereas Portnox CORE is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform and Sophos Network Access Control. See our Portnox CORE vs. Portnox Clear report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
