Planview ProjectPlace vs SAP Build Work Zone comparison

Planview and SAP are both solutions in the Project Management Software category. Planview is ranked #22, while SAP is ranked #151. Planview holds a 1.4% mindshare in PMS, compared to SAP’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Planview users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Planview ProjectPlace

Read 9 Planview ProjectPlace reviews

1,924 Views
1,443 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Build Work Zone

Read 5 SAP Build Work Zone reviews

1,041 Views
10 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Planview ProjectPlace

SAP Build Work Zone

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 15, 2026

SAP Jam and Planview ProjectPlace are competitive in the collaboration solutions category, focusing on team communication and project management. Data indicates that SAP Jam leads in pricing and support, while Planview ProjectPlace excels with its advanced features, attracting users interested in a feature-rich experience.

Features: SAP Jam offers effective integration with SAP solutions, providing robust social collaboration tools and flexible community management to enhance teamwork. Planview ProjectPlace, on the other hand, emphasizes task management, visual project planning with Kanban boards, and real-time collaboration, which are suited for managing complex projects efficiently.

Room for Improvement: SAP Jam could enhance integration possibilities with non-SAP systems and refine its user interface for a more intuitive experience. Additionally, there is potential to improve cross-departmental collaboration tools. Planview ProjectPlace might benefit from streamlining the user onboarding process and expanding the customizability of its dashboards. Opportunities also exist in enhancing offline functionalities and simplifying its real-time tracking features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Jam offers an easy integration process, particularly advantageous for existing SAP ecosystem users, coupled with robust support services. Planview ProjectPlace presents more complexity during deployment but compensates with comprehensive onboarding processes and a dedicated customer service team to address potential deployment hurdles.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Jam provides a cost-effective solution with competitive pricing structures that yield a positive ROI for companies already utilizing SAP ecosystems. Conversely, Planview ProjectPlace involves a higher initial investment justified by powerful project management features that deliver considerable long-term ROI. The choice between them often depends on prioritizing immediate cost savings or preferring extensive project management capabilities for future returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Planview ProjectPlace vs. SAP Build Work Zone Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Planview ProjectPlace vs. SAP Build Work Zone

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planview ProjectPlace

Ranking in Project Management Software

22nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Build Work Zone

Ranking in Project Management Software

151st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (44th), Enterprise Social Software (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Planview ProjectPlace is 1.4%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Build Work Zone is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Planview ProjectPlace	1.4%
SAP Build Work Zone	0.0%
Other	98.6%

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Eduardo Maya

PMO at Hoteles City Express

A complete and useful solution, but it should be easy to use, and they should provide fast support

Their support team should provide the answers fast because it impacts our daily operations. We use the app every day. We have about 70 projects managed in the app, but their responses are too slow. They can take three or four days to analyze a problem. We have a connection-related problem, which is impacting our daily operations, but we have had the same status for the last two months. It is not easy. The deployment of the application and its functionalities are not easy. It is a complex process to create accounts, names, and catalogs. There should be more operational reports. They have a set of internal reports, but they can't be customized. You don't have the permissions to configure your own reports, which is a very big issue. Currently, you have to ask for permission in order to configure simple filters. You have to ask a third party to configure it. It is expensive, and it also takes a lot of time.

Read full review

AhmedHaridy

Managing Director at Emkan

A powerful tool for managing subscriptions within the organization

It's undoubtedly more complex compared to the initial part. It depends on the requirements. You can't categorically say that HubSpot is only suitable for smaller devices; it's adaptable to various needs. Depending on the requirements, you can have a project completed within as little as six months or as long as a few years. It's a flexible solution that can cater to your specific needs. However, it's essential to start from the beginning, designing the screens and pages within HubSpot. It's somewhat similar to building a website but generally more straightforward to use. You need to input the necessary information based on your specific requirements, and it's not limited to a predefined structure. The team initiates the process with what we term as solution design, but it's more appropriately labeled as enterprise design. This initial phase involves understanding the integration points with other systems and commencing the configuration process. It's essentially the starting point for our analysis. The analysis covers several aspects, including the language requirements, integration tools for interfacing with Java server solutions, and how to effectively use these tools. All these components must seamlessly complement each other. Once the team has everything in place and confirms the tools, they can proceed to elaborate on the specific requirements. The deployment timeline typically ranges from four to six months, specifically for straightforward or standard requirements. However, in the case of a large enterprise organization with numerous legal entities across different countries, each requiring unique interfaces for various purposes, the implementation duration is highly dependent on the specific requirements. It's not feasible to provide a fixed period for such a solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would absolutely recommend the system to other users."

"Projectplace absolutely supports collaboration in real-time. It's probably one of the best tools out there for collaboration. It affects the project's progress quite a bit. I have started two very similar projects in two separate business units, on very similar teams. I did one with Enterprise One, I did one with Projectplace just to see how the mileage would vary. The one with Projectplace had a very short cycle time so we were able to finish the project earlier. The one with Enterprise One was less engaging and it took a little more time. Because we were tracking the tasks inside the schedule it was not on the cards."

"From a scale of one to 10, the overall visibility into project status provided by Projectplace is definitely a 10."

"I love the collaborative nature just from my role to help. I'm a strategist. I help manage those large strategic projects. Implementation is one significant piece of my role, but I love the collaboration that can exist within the tool."

"From an organizational perspective, the transparency and accountability across a project and the work that needs to be done is just wonderful, and there's a ton of value as an organization for the transparency and accountability of work that needs to be done."

"I think the price of Projectplace is highly reasonable for the amount of functionality that you get."

"It is a complete solution; it is very useful for the management of our internal processes."

"The workspace ease, navigation, and portfolios are the most valuable aspects of this solution. I just got access to the portfolios from my upper management, so I'm able to look at our specific SRE portfolio to see what's a priority, look at how many hours we've tracked, and things like that. I'm not so much included in the budgeting but it's important to see what projects are higher priority and so forth."

More Planview ProjectPlace pros

"SAP JAM has lots of possibilities and my client is using it for very specific matters, like social collaboration."

"One notable feature is the "improvement training," which allows you to define groups, facilitate information sharing, enable participant rating, and establish rankings. This enables you to identify which participants are actively engaged and sharing information and which ones are less active."

"Properly done, this software can be a great resource for your employees to stay engaged and connected to each other and to your organization."

"It connects to SAP C4C (Cloud for Customer) and is a very useful collaboration tool for the sales, services, and marketing teams."

"All employees, from the CEO to the warehouse personnel, have access to Jam and contribute to the news feeds and consume content."

Cons

"In India, we have found that it crashes once in six months and we lose some data when there is a crash."

"We have a connection-related problem, which is impacting our daily operations, but we have had the same status for the last two months."

"Planview turned out to be completely useless for my use cases because I needed to be able to take large stories or large Epix and put them on a backlog and associate them with Planview work breakdown structure schedules."

"We'd like to see a heartier connection between Projectplace and Enterprise One."

"We'd like to see a heartier connection between Projectplace and Enterprise One. We know that's on their roadmap, but they haven't gotten there yet. Planview could also make better use of Projectplace's template capability."

"If the mobile app were improved to show more information then it would be good."

"The time reporting is an excellent feature that they can show from an individual. The only problem I see is the description field. You can't increase that field, like to pull the column and widen the column that I've seen. I'm not seeing anywhere you could do that. Because you may have some of these cards that start with the same name and you only have so much real estate. There should be a way to adjust those columns somewhat so you can look at the description or hover over it and it tells you what the description is."

"In terms of what could be improved in Planview Projectplace, it would depend on the purpose, because if you talk about resource planning, from my perspective, it's not the best tool."

More Planview ProjectPlace cons

"I'm hopeful for more integrations with SAP JAM in the future."

"Both layout and branding could be improved."

"Sometimes it's a bit confusing with so many options."

"The user interface is still quite rigid."

"Built-in integrations with other SAP products could be better. We use a SAP HCM product as well, but synching data is a tremendous issue."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It can be expensive, but if you see the functionalities and the processes, it's not as expensive as other applications. We pay about 1 million Mexican Pesos per year for all 100 licenses."

"I believe it is a good value for money for the service they provide and the tailored program. When compared to Microsoft Project."

"In my opinion, the pricing is reasonable."

"I would say the licensing maturity was probably a three out of five. They have a long way to go before they can scale out and retain enterprise customers."

"I think the price of Projectplace is highly reasonable for the amount of functionality that you get. We have what they call a FLEX License. That means you get Projectplace, Enterprise One, and Leankits all on the same license. That's great because then you can use the other products without any additional cost."

"The cost of this product is mid-range. It's not too expensive but not the cheapest on the market."

"You need to pay for additional languages. It is somewhat expensive and the payment frequency can be annual or monthly, depending on the choice. There are no extra costs beyond the standard license and implementation fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Comparisons

Tenrox Cloud PPM vs Planview ProjectPlace

Compared 6% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview ProjectPlace

Compared 6% of the time

Jira vs Planview ProjectPlace

Compared 6% of the time

monday.com vs Planview ProjectPlace

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Planview ProjectPlace

Compared 5% of the time

More Planview ProjectPlace Competitors

Slack Business - Enterprise vs SAP Build Work Zone

Compared 32% of the time

Yammer vs SAP Build Work Zone

Compared 23% of the time

SharePoint vs SAP Build Work Zone

Compared 13% of the time

Quip vs SAP Build Work Zone

Compared 11% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs SAP Build Work Zone

Compared 9% of the time

More SAP Build Work Zone Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planview ProjectPlace

April 2026

Download Planview ProjectPlace product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Management Software

April 2026

Download SAP Build Work Zone product report

Also Known As

Projectplace

No data available

Overview

Planview ProjectPlace offers effective project management through features like Kanban boards and real-time updates, aiding collaboration and visibility. Its adaptability allows for detailed planning and feature customization, integrating tools like JIRA for streamlined management.

Planview ProjectPlace enhances project oversight with advanced workspace navigation, flexible document sharing, and real-time updates on project progress. Integration with tools like Enterprise One and JIRA streamlines project workflows, with features customizable to different team needs. Users benefit from risk management tools and a command feature on project cards that aids in task tracking. The platform supports comprehensive project management, although areas like integration with Enterprise One, graphic performance, and user interface could be improved. Users have noted a need for more robust reporting, refined resource planning, and enhanced mobile app information display. Support response times and integrations with financial tools are areas for future enhancement.

What are the key features of Planview ProjectPlace?

Workspace Navigation: Offers intuitive navigation to manage multiple project components efficiently.
Kanban Boards: Enhance team collaboration through visual task management.
Document Sharing: Simplify team collaboration with secure and efficient document management.
Integration Capabilities: Integrate seamlessly with JIRA and Enterprise One for streamlined workflow.
Risk Management: Boosts overall project assurance and control.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Visibility: Real-time updates facilitate better project tracking and management.
Customizability: Features can be tailored to meet team-specific needs for greater efficiency.
Collaboration: Improved cooperation with tools designed for team interaction.
Efficient Tracking: Command features on cards assist in detailed task monitoring.
Adaptability: Flexible to various project scopes and processes.

Organizations across industries like healthcare, information systems, and R&D utilize Planview ProjectPlace for its robust project management capabilities. Healthcare teams manage compliance improvement projects, while IT departments focus on planning and tracking. R&D teams benefit from improved task management and document sharing, ensuring project alignment with strategic goals.

Planview

SAP Jam provides a collaborative platform designed to enhance communication and streamline processes within organizations, offering tools to boost efficiency and facilitate knowledge sharing.

This comprehensive platform supports seamless collaboration, helping teams connect by integrating social networking capabilities and enterprise resource planning. Its features are tailored to meet the demands of fast-paced environments that value flexibility and connectivity.

What are the key features of SAP Jam?

Social Collaboration: Enhance team interactions with collaboration tools.
Content Management: Efficiently manage and share documents.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrate with SAP and third-party applications.
Mobile Access: Work is accessible through mobile applications.
Analytics and Reporting: Gain insights with robust analytics tools.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Productivity: Streamline work processes for higher output.
Enhanced Communication: Reduce silos with improved information flow.
Cost Efficiency: Decrease expenses associated with traditional communication tools.
Flexibility: Adapt to evolving business needs with versatile features.

SAP Jam is implemented in industries like healthcare and manufacturing, where real-time collaboration and efficient information dissemination are critical. In healthcare, it supports clinical teams with patient data sharing, while in manufacturing, it aids in aligning operations and supply chain management.

SAP

Sample Customers

Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Florida Virtual Campus, Amazing.com, 2degrees NZ, Kendrick Content & Consulting

INEOS Melamines GmbH, Medtronic, Schaidt Innovations GmbH & Co. KG, Plan International, Sailing Team Germany, Australian Department of Immigration and Border Protection, SHORE Solutions Inc., TranSystems Corporation, Day & Zimmerman, Serco Group, Harlequi

Buyer's Guide

Planview ProjectPlace vs. SAP Build Work Zone

May 2026

Free Report: Planview ProjectPlace vs. SAP Build Work Zone

Find out what your peers are saying about Planview ProjectPlace vs. SAP Build Work Zone and other solutions. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Planview ProjectPlace vs. SAP Build Work Zone report.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.