Planview Portfolios vs Teamwork comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Planview Logo
1,774 views|913 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Teamwork Logo
596 views|390 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Planview Portfolios and Teamwork based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Planview Portfolios vs. Teamwork Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Its view into resource capacity and availability absolutely help us manage work. We can't plan out projects for delivery until we know if we have resources available to deliver them. That's been really critical. We look at our projects and see what availability of resources we have. That helps us to determine when we can start new work.""Its ability to create summary reports across multiple projects is one of the best features. They have very good data warehousing. You can put that out. You can tell that data warehousing from Planview Enterprise One is excellent.""The most valuable features are scheduling, resource management, and, from a project perspective, the functions like issues that change orders. They are valuable because, from a project management perspective, we use the workflows that we build for project management and do active risk management and issue management for the projects that we want for our agencies.""Enterprise One provides end-to-end work management for the full spectrum of types of work in one tool.""It has helped improve governance, mostly. People want to know where their money's going. Projects sponsors need to know what we're spending money on and what our burn rate is. Planview can give that to you straightaway.""The overall interface is very easy to use. It puts together strategy and execution across all your investments.""The solution’s integrated product portfolio has transformed our organization’s delivery because people are a lot more accountable. When you have no accountability, then people don't always deliver the way that you want them to. Once you get accountability, they know that somebody is watching and the way that they manage their work changes quite a bit.""I like that the data that we store is available for everybody. We're not trying to hide anything. Being an administrator, I know a lot about the tool. It is very easy to show somebody how to use the tool and get used to it. Hopefully that user doesn't come back and ask the same question twice is really what it is about. It's a very intuitive product as well. For what we use the tool for today, it's easy to learn and pick up."

More Planview Portfolios Pros →

"Teamwork has made process management easier and much better. It is very robust and improves by making a lot of changes. It is easy to use and has lots of reports.""It is a very stable solution...The initial setup of Teamwork is easy.""The setup was very easy. Deployment was very fast for us. We started using it within two weeks."

More Teamwork Pros →

Cons
"It is a bit of a rigid system.""Their off-shore support is something new that they're laying out and the team just needed some development in terms of skill and experience.""Its support to legacy paying customers is something PlanView is not handling well.​ We were unable to implement due to lack of professional support by PlanView. ​""While Planview Management provides robust reporting and analytics capabilities, further enhancements could include more advanced data visualization options, predictive analytics features, and customizable dashboards to provide deeper insights into project performance and trends.""I would like a bit more flexibility, as far as the configuration, and have additional capabilities to configure, making it more flexible for our use.""Configuring the UI in the content management system is too elaborate and too time-consuming.""There are some issues with how long it takes to load the data to Planview, It just depends on what your setup is. If there was a way Planview could maybe make the loading faster, in case you do have a lot of things going on with your setup.""When it comes to reporting there are some challenges with integration."

More Planview Portfolios Cons →

"The product is expensive. It needs to have a more robust and customizable calendar.""The product could be improved with more integrations and a mobile app.""The screen sharing provided by the solution can be a challenge to a user. Screen sharing is an area that needs improvement in the solution."

More Teamwork Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing part is a bit costly in comparison with the other available PPM tools."
  • "We are on the Flex licenses."
  • "We have unlimited licenses for all of our functionalities. Since we went global, we went with that model."
  • "The cost of other pieces and integrating them in needs improvement."
  • "We have portfolio managers, resource managers, project managers, and time reporting licenses. These are the licenses that we have."
  • "I don't think we have necessarily purchased everything that I would have liked to have seen."
  • "We have several hundred licenses. It costs us several hundred thousand dollars a year."
  • "We overbought our licenses. We looked at our needs three to four years down the road and tried based our contract on that. However, we were over aggressive. We use about a third of the licenses that we have. We're looking to adjust the makeup so we can start utilizing the amount of money that we are spending. Right now, we're overspending, and my organization is not seeing the value in Planview because we are paying so much for licenses that we're not using."
  • More Planview Portfolios Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "My company makes annual payments towards the licensing costs of the solution."
  • "We negotiate on pricing since we are a long-term user."
  • More Teamwork Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Planview Management integrates seamlessly with other tools and systems used within the organization, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, customer relationship management (CRM)… more »
    Top Answer:Planview Portfolios is not too expensive. You get what you paid for.
    Top Answer:Enhancements are needed in: Advanced reporting and analytics: While Planview Management provides robust reporting and analytics capabilities, further enhancements could include more advanced data… more »
    Top Answer:Teamwork has made process management easier and much better. It is very robust and improves by making a lot of changes. It is easy to use and has lots of reports.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. It needs to have a more robust and customizable calendar.
    Top Answer:We use the product to design online courses. It also helps us with media production and marketing.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,774
    Comparisons
    913
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    909
    Rating
    8.3
    23rd
    Views
    596
    Comparisons
    390
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    321
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Planview Enterprise One, Troux
    Learn More
    Overview

    Planview Portfolios enables enterprises to accelerate strategic execution by integrating business and technology planning, optimizing all resources, and delivering breakthrough products, services, and customer experiences to achieve maximum business performance.

    Teamwork is a comprehensive project management and collaboration software that enables teams to work together efficiently and effectively. With its wide range of features and intuitive interface, Teamwork helps streamline workflows, improve communication, and increase productivity.

    One of the key features of Teamwork is its task management capabilities. Users can create tasks, assign them to team members, set due dates, and track progress. This ensures that everyone is on the same page and deadlines are met. Additionally, users can create task dependencies, allowing for better coordination and sequencing of work.

    Teamwork also offers powerful collaboration tools. Users can create and share documents, files, and notes, making it easy for team members to access and collaborate on important information. The software also includes a messaging feature, enabling real-time communication and reducing the need for lengthy email threads.

    Another notable feature of Teamwork is its time-tracking functionality. Users can log their time spent on tasks, providing valuable insights into project progress and resource allocation. This feature is particularly useful for tracking billable hours and ensuring accurate invoicing.

    Teamwork also offers robust project planning and scheduling capabilities. Users can create project timelines, set milestones, and allocate resources. The software provides a visual representation of project progress, allowing teams to easily identify bottlenecks and adjust timelines accordingly.

    Furthermore, Teamwork integrates with a wide range of third-party applications, such as Google Drive, Dropbox, and Slack, enhancing collaboration and streamlining workflows. The software also offers mobile apps, enabling users to stay connected and productive on the go.

    Sample Customers
    UPS, NatWest, Ingram Micro, Canadian Tire, Viessmann, Volvo, NASCO, UNESCO
    PayPal, eBay, Disney, Forbes, Microsoft studios, Spotify Vevo, Lenovo, HP, Honda
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Insurance Company23%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Pharma/Biotech Company8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization51%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise92%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise52%
    Large Enterprise36%
    Buyer's Guide
    Planview Portfolios vs. Teamwork
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Planview Portfolios vs. Teamwork and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Planview Portfolios is ranked 8th in Project Portfolio Management with 63 reviews while Teamwork is ranked 23rd in Project Management Software with 3 reviews. Planview Portfolios is rated 8.0, while Teamwork is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Planview Portfolios writes "Helps prioritize projects, share the big picture with management, and has a great planning capacity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teamwork writes "A flexible, stable, and scalable tool requiring an easy initial setup phase". Planview Portfolios is most compared with Broadcom Clarity , Planview PPM Pro, SAP Portfolio and Project Management, LeanIX and Planview ProjectPlace, whereas Teamwork is most compared with Smartsheet, Jira, monday.com and OpenText Project and portfolio Management. See our Planview Portfolios vs. Teamwork report.

    See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.

    We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.