Ping Identity Platform vs Zilla Security comparison

Ping Identity Platform and Zilla Security compete in identity and access management solutions. Ping holds an advantage in user satisfaction due to its comprehensive support offerings, while Zilla is recognized for its feature set, positioning it as a worthwhile investment.

Features: Ping Identity Platform provides robust authentication, single sign-on, and multi-factor authentication with a focus on security and integration. Zilla Security stands out with granular access controls and robust compliance tracking, giving it an edge through its security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ping Identity Platform ensures a streamlined deployment process with extensive support, facilitating seamless integration with existing systems. Zilla Security also supports efficient deployment but is distinguished by its proactive support team, enhancing post-deployment optimization and slightly outshining Ping in this area.

Pricing and ROI: Ping Identity Platform has a higher setup cost, reflecting its extensive features, but delivers substantial ROI through enhanced security capabilities. Zilla Security offers a cost-effective option with an attractive feature-to-cost ratio, achieving quicker ROI. Despite Ping's robust features, Zilla Security's balance of cost and features provides a favorable ROI advantage.