Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs PlanetScale comparison

Oracle and PlanetScale are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Oracle is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5, while PlanetScale is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.2. Additionally, 90% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PlanetScale users who would recommend it.

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Read 20 Oracle MySQL Cloud Service reviews

202 Views
141 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

PlanetScale

Read 6 PlanetScale reviews

114 Views
31 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

PlanetScale

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service and PlanetScale are competing in the cloud-based database services category. While Oracle MySQL Cloud Service seems favorable in terms of support and pricing, PlanetScale often has the upper hand due to its innovative features and user satisfaction.

Features: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service provides robust data management capabilities, extensive support for MySQL databases, and reliable performance for large-scale operations. PlanetScale offers a serverless architecture, seamless scalability, and the ability to handle complex workloads with ease. The essential difference is Oracle's traditional strength in database management versus PlanetScale's modern features and scalability.

Room for Improvement: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service can improve in areas of modernizing interfaces, reducing setup times, and enhancing its pricing models for smaller enterprises. PlanetScale may enhance by offering more comprehensive documentation for beginners, optimizing its integration with more third-party tools, and providing better real-time customer support accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service offers a straightforward deployment process with comprehensive support, ensuring smooth integration. PlanetScale provides a flexible, fast deployment model that allows quick scaling as needed. Both platforms deliver distinctive customer service: Oracle focusing on traditional methods and PlanetScale on agile solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service generally has higher setup costs but offers consistent ROI for large enterprises through scalable solutions. PlanetScale is often more cost-effective, appealing to businesses seeking quick ROI via scalable, serverless infrastructure. Oracle’s approach suits extensive database environments, while PlanetScale attracts those needing flexibility and modern efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PlanetScale Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PlanetScale

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (7th)

PlanetScale

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Raghuram K M

Chief Technology Officer at Prognosys Medical Systems

Ideal, stable, good support and it helps with the developer console

I have used MongoDB, MySQL, and Oracle. MongoDB is entirely different. It's a NoSQL platform database, so it's totally different. It is a little bit hard to work with. The way it is organized and structured is different. But between Microsoft Azure MySQL and Oracle, they are pretty similar. * Cost: Microsoft is not a preferred platform. Their licensing is very complex and expensive. Oracle is much better. * AI: In terms of data analytics and AI, Microsoft is better. Certain complex transformations are easier to do in MSSQL. So, if you have to analyze data from a lot of different data sources, it becomes much easier. However, the usage of the particular product depends on the project. Personally, I would like to work on MySQL. But in certain cases where the application scale is very large, and custom models from certain regions of the globe prefer Microsoft, then we have to go with MSSQL. But technically, there is not much difference.

Read full review

Neeraj Sameer Allu

Founder at Tuft

Manages databases in serverless environments and easy to get started with

The main thing I didn't like about PlanetScale was that we couldn't run analytical queries on it. They bill based on the number of rows read, so even a simple count query could easily use up our allocated resources. Apart from that, I actually loved it. It's based on MySQL, so it doesn't have foreign key constraints or cascades. We have to delete manually or use an ORM. As it's based on MySQL, we can use log posters for complex queries, but it only supports MySQL. I feel like Postgres is more useful for custom or complex queries.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service is easy to use and implement."

"MySQL is very stable and works beautifully with large amounts of data."

"It's easy to use."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The solution's performance is good."

"It is very easy to start working with the product."

"The product is good for tuning."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service pros

"The solution is beginner-friendly. Like any new platform, it can be a bit confusing at first. But after spending about an hour with it, you can get a clear idea of what everything is for. It's not very confusing; I think they've improved it recently."

"I did not face any downtime when using the product."

"The database is accessible 24/7, ensuring my project runs smoothly without interruptions."

"The branching feature is also good for developer experience."

"I like the solution's developer experience. When you deploy changes to the database in the portal, you can use different deployment strategies and see how things work. You can put changes into different branches, like deployment and staging. This is built into the product, allowing you to navigate changes through different branches."

Cons

"Integrating business intelligence or NLP solutions would help us save time and would prevent us from having to take a deep dive. Data problems seem to multiply on the system when you interact with it. Automation would save a lot of man-hours."

"Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions."

"Sometimes MySQL does upgrades on the server. When we are still using the old server and when they integrate the upgrade, they don't carry along some of the old syntaxes. The versions don't sync."

"It requires a significant amount of expertise and effort to manage, especially when dealing with substantial volumes of data."

"MySQL should have some kind of native query browser. If it could come with a built-in connector."

"The tool’s stability must be improved."

"They could include more advanced features like clustering and replication in the Oracle databases."

"The product has many bugs."

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service cons

"The main thing I didn't like about PlanetScale was that we couldn't run analytical queries on it."

"I used PlanetScale for hobby projects, so my perspective differs from someone using it commercially. Unfortunately, they've removed the free tier in recent months and pivoted to a business-to-business model. This is sad for hobby developers like me because it's a great product, but I understand they have costs to cover."

"When I tried to integrate the solution with Firebase for authentication, I faced some interruptions. Also, when using it with Next.js and NextAuth.js for Google and social logins, I had some troubles."

"We encountered some initial issues during the product deployment, which required me to search for solutions on forums."

"I am not sure, but I think recently, the tool removed the free version."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is free since it is an open-source tool."

"The solution’s paid plans are expensive."

"The product is expensive."

"The license is expensive."

"While the core solution itself is not exorbitant, the support services are associated with a significant maintenance fee, often ranging from twenty to thirty percent."

"Oracle has a better licensing model compared to its competitors."

"It is an open-source product."

"Last time, when I wanted to use the tool in a project, I could see it was only paid, so I didn't use the service."

"I am currently using the product's free version, which has been sufficient for my portfolio project."

"The solution is expensive for beginners. That's why I wasn't motivated to use it more. But they were already providing many features for free for beginners, which was great."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service handles data easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

I have never paid for the full version of Oracle MySQL Cloud Service. We use the free version or the version available in RDS ( /products/amazon-rds-reviews ) from AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-review...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle MySQL Cloud Service?

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service should be easier to replicate and integrate into further solutions. Although it targets Linux and UNIX environments, its performance is not as optimized on Windows platfo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PlanetScale?

I am currently using the product's free version, which has been sufficient for my portfolio project. The paid version ranges from $39 to $1,000, depending on the features and scale required.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PlanetScale?

I would like PlanetScale to have a feature where the database can be accessed in the cloud with a link, allowing for a more user-friendly interface compared to the terminal. This would make it easi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PlanetScale?

I have used PlanetScale as it is an advanced version of MySQL. It functions as a platform where MySQL is live, similar to AWS. I use PlanetScale to store data in a live environment where queries ca...

See all answers

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 57% of the time

MySQL vs Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

Compared 43% of the time

More Oracle MySQL Cloud Service Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service

April 2025

Download Oracle MySQL Cloud Service product report

Buyer's Guide

Relational Databases Tools

May 2025

Download PlanetScale product report

Overview

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service delivers a secure, cost-effective and enterprise-grade MySQL database service. Built on MySQL Enterprise Edition and powered by the Oracle Cloud, it provides a simple, automated, integrated and enterprise ready MySQL cloud service, enabling organizations to increase business agility and reduce costs.

Oracle

PlanetScale offers seamless database management with features tailored for modern development environments, enabling enhanced project operations through efficient integration and ease of use.

PlanetScale is designed to support modern developer workflows through features like automated connection pooling and constant availability, making it ideal for serverless applications. Its integration with tools like GitHub and Prisma enhances the developer experience, allowing fast setup and effortless database interactions. However, users note challenges with analytical queries due to row-based billing and the absence of foreign key constraints. Integration with platforms such as Firebase and Next.js presents additional hurdles. Recent changes, such as the removal of the free tier, have impacted adoption by hobby developers, highlighting a need for more accessible pricing plans.

What are the most important features of PlanetScale?

Automated Connection Pooling: Optimizes database connections for serverless environments.
Constant Availability: Ensures uninterrupted operations and workflow efficiency.
Developer-Friendly: Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and Prisma for enhanced project management.
Quick Setup: Simplifies setup processes in corporate environments, allowing immediate use.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating PlanetScale?

Uninterrupted Project Operations: Facilitates constant availability for high-performance applications.
Enhanced Developer Experience: Offers intuitive integrations and project management capabilities.
Ease of Integration: Works well with popular tools like Prisma and MySQL for efficient workflows.

PlanetScale finds significant use in hosting databases for portfolios, company websites, and academic projects. Its compatibility with Prisma facilitates seamless MySQL database management online. Users leverage its capabilities for analytical queries and manage data environments effectively. Teams value the platform for specialized tasks such as URL shortening and social media automation, which are crucial in rapidly evolving digital industries.

PlanetScale

Sample Customers

Omnis, Naveex, Rehash Technologies

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PlanetScale

April 2025

Free Report: Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PlanetScale

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PlanetScale and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle MySQL Cloud Service vs. PlanetScale report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.