We performed a comparison between Oracle Enterprise Manager and SCOM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, Quest Software, SolarWinds and others in Database Development and Management."SQL Tuning Advisor, ADDM, Top Activity, ASM Space Manager, Incident Notifications"
"Oracle Enterprise Manager triggers critical alerts."
"The most valuable features are security and speed."
"The single-pane and single interface in the centralized system is the most valuable feature."
"I like that it's stable."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager helps to control servers."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring because it's very useful for checking and troubleshooting compared with other products, like Nagios for example, that have some interaction with Oracle."
"It can also help with capacity planning, sizing, and maximizing overall performance in a large scale environment."
"The ease of deployment, especially on Windows platforms, is valuable."
"They have great integration with the active directory."
"It's easy to use."
"Because it's Windows-based, it actually reports quite well. It reports everything you can think of on the Windows server and allows you to monitor anything. It's excellent for those in the Windows world as it's very good at it."
"It works better than other products I’ve used – namely SolarWinds, which is cumbersome and error prone for web app monitoring. SCOM is not."
"The solution's reporting engine has given me detailed information on which applications or services I've either failed or about to fail in terms of the predictive makeup on Azure cloud."
"The most valuable features in SCOM are Azure monitoring and integration with Azure Monitor for monitoring Azure-hosted servers from SCOM on-premises."
"This is a product that does more generally than any of the competing solutions."
"We have encountered performance issues when the load is huge."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager's scalability is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"It needs to support the Database versions lower than 10.2."
"I would say mostly backup and recovery, through the Enterprise Manager. Or any corruptions, to be able to fix them through Enterprise Manager."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The tool is expensive."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
"The solution is not as simple as people say it is."
"Direct integration with third-party tools, like ticketing systems, is lacking but would be beneficial."
"Non Windows monitoring is fairly weak. Network device monitoring is not reliable."
"I would like more customized reports. People should have some customization option on the dashboards for whenever they put multiple lists into it. Beyond customizing the content, there should be the ability to customize the colors so that they can engage some priority and mark challenges separately."
"The GI is difficult to work with and the reporting servers are also difficult."
"In a future release, they should add email notification alerts."
"It could use some system enhancements, such as better dashboards."
"We didn't know the solution enough, and therefore, it took a while to set everything up correctly. There was a learning curve."
"Stability and some performance issues exist and they need improvement."
Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 123 reviews while SCOM is ranked 3rd in Event Monitoring with 77 reviews. Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4, while SCOM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases, whereas SCOM is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Datadog, Nagios XI and AppDynamics.
We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.