Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service vs webMethods.io comparison

Oracle and IBM are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Oracle is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.9. Oracle holds a 0.6% mindshare in CDI, compared to IBM’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Oracle Data Integrator Clou...

Read 7 Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service reviews

460 Views
147 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

9,290 Views
1,301 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle Data Integrator Clou...

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service and webMethods.io are prominent contenders in the data integration category. Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service has the edge in complex data transformations and legacy system integration, while webMethods.io excels in providing an agile platform.

Features: Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service offers strong ELT capabilities, comprehensive Oracle database support, and efficient handling of large data volumes. webMethods.io provides pre-built connectors, flexible workflow automation, and cloud-native integration options.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service could enhance its speed of customer support responses, simplify setup and configuration, and provide more intuitive interfaces. webMethods.io may enhance API management capabilities, improve its governance features, and offer more advanced real-time analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service requires extensive setup and customization but is suited for large organizations. Its customer service is specialized but slow. webMethods.io offers a streamlined deployment process with quick configuration and a responsive support team.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service involves a significant initial investment with long-term ROI through integration capabilities. webMethods.io provides a cost-effective setup with a quick time-to-value, focusing on rapid ROI through its efficient SaaS model.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Data Integrator Clou...

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (11th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 5.1%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	5.1%
Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service	0.6%
Other	94.3%

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Peeyush Chouksey

Associate Manager at Accenture

Allows us to integrate different cloud services with different applications

It's lacking a lot of mapping features that Oracle OSB and SOA have. It needs to evolve a lot. When it comes to mapping, you are quite restricted. If you have to use a specific, typical function, you need to do a Java callout or something. OSB has a lot of features they are using like Java APIs because it's on-premises.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Oracle integration cloud has got the adapters for all their products, which makes integration faster."

"The data is stored in the cloud, making it easy to download data simultaneously into multiple smaller servers, effectively downsizing the process."

"Having a single vendor supporting the entire suite of applications."

"The solution is easy to manage and offers good integration. You can run all the tasks one by one which is really helpful, and pick the day and time to do so."

"The most valuable thing to me is its simplicity. A person with zero knowledge can also develop the integration without having extensive technology knowledgebase. They can also work on creating their own integration."

"It's on the cloud, so it's scalable and quite easy to work with."

"Oracle Data Integrator helps us build tables and data marts and allows us to schedule them daily, for nearly real-time data warehousing."

"Broker and UM are the best features."

"The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."

"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."

"The stability is good."

"The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging."

"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."

"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Bulk uploading can be a problem when you hit the upper limit."

"It can be made much easier for users. They should be allowed to easily monitor the data extraction and flow, allowing them to observe real-time data flow within the software, making the process straightforward."

"The pricing could be more competitive."

"This is an expensive solution compared to other products on the market."

"It's lacking a lot of mapping features that Oracle OSB and SOA have. It needs to evolve a lot."

"I would like to see different cloud adapters or connectors in case of integration. When you have Oracle to Oracle, they are good. They have really good connectors, but if it is a different ERP, like Obsidian, that is where they are faced with problems in OIC."

"I've found technical support not very effective. They should work to improve their services."

"For code version control, you need to use some external software."

"webMethods Integration Server could improve on the version control. I'm not sure if Web Method has some kind of inbuilt integration with Bitbucket or GitHub or some kind of version control system. However, that's one area where they can improve."

"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."

"Some things could be improved, especially how ActiveTransfer handles third-party file transfers. It would be nice to have a native file-watching mechanism for when you're scheduling jobs with a third-party scheduler. Currently, we are using an outside file watcher solution to check the files before the file transfer. It checks the location to see if the file is there. If the file is there, it will prepare it for transfer. If the file isn't available, it will send an email it can create a ticket send it now. We recommended adding this file watcher mechanism."

"The configuring of the JWT token would be improved as it is a confusing process. We require more information on this part of the solution."

"With respect to the API gateway, the runtime component, the stability after a new release is something that can be improved."

"Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."

"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is competitive compared to Boomi which is much higher."

"webMethods Integration Server is expensive, and there's no fixed price on it because it has a point pricing model. You can negotiate, which makes it interesting."

"I would like to see better pricing for the license."

"The price of webMethods Integration Server isn't that high from an enterprise context, but open-source ESB solutions will always be the cheapest."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

"I signed a three-year deal with them. It is a yearly locked-in price for the next three years."

"I am not involved in the licensing side of things."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"I do see a lack of capabilities inside of the monetization area for them. They have a cloud infrastructure that is pay per use type of a thing. If you already use 1,000 transactions per se, then you can be charged and billed. I see room for improvement there for their side on that particular capability of the monetization."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	63

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service?

The data is stored in the cloud, making it easy to download data simultaneously into multiple smaller servers, effectively downsizing the process.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service?

It can be made much easier for users. They should be allowed to easily monitor the data extraction and flow, allowing them to observe real-time data flow within the software, making the process str...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service?

I have experience working with Korean Telecom (Katie) on various projects involving data integration, especially with Oracle databases. These projects included tasks such as data collection, ETL (E...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service

Compared 100% of the time

More Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service

August 2025

Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

August 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service provides pushdown data processing; high performance ETL with less data movement which is best for the Cloud. Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service executes data transformations where the data lies without having to copy data unnecessarily to remote locations.

Oracle

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Amplifon

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Free Report: Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.