Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service vs webMethods.io comparison

Oracle and IBM are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Oracle is ranked #28, while IBM is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.7. Oracle holds a 1.2% mindshare in CDI, compared to IBM’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Oracle Data Integrator Clou...

Read 7 Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service reviews

603 Views
277 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 94 webMethods.io reviews

8,762 Views
1,402 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle Data Integrator Clou...

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service and webMethods.io are prominent contenders in the data integration category. Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service has the edge in complex data transformations and legacy system integration, while webMethods.io excels in providing an agile platform.

Features: Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service offers strong ELT capabilities, comprehensive Oracle database support, and efficient handling of large data volumes. webMethods.io provides pre-built connectors, flexible workflow automation, and cloud-native integration options.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service could enhance its speed of customer support responses, simplify setup and configuration, and provide more intuitive interfaces. webMethods.io may enhance API management capabilities, improve its governance features, and offer more advanced real-time analytics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service requires extensive setup and customization but is suited for large organizations. Its customer service is specialized but slow. webMethods.io offers a streamlined deployment process with quick configuration and a responsive support team.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service involves a significant initial investment with long-term ROI through integration capabilities. webMethods.io provides a cost-effective setup with a quick time-to-value, focusing on rapid ROI through its efficient SaaS model.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Data Integrator Clou...

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (2nd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (10th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service is 1.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 4.4%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	4.4%
Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service	1.2%
Other	94.4%

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Aditya Devaguptapu

Senior Solution Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

A well-established product that meets all our specifications in terms of usability

In the initial stage when we went with Data Integrator Cloud Service it was primarily the nativity factor that was key for us. Having a single vendor supporting the entire suite of applications, and the ability to configure activities and direct integration with various other Oracle products, were the main attractive features within ODI. This is a well-established product that's good to have if you hold an Oracle suite of applications. It meets all our specifications in terms of usability.

Read full review

Yashraj Makwana

Developer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Offers strong integration capabilities and reliable features but needs pricing and scaling improvements

Many things are evolving with the AI buzz in the market. What I would like to see improved or enhanced in webMethods.io in the future is that since webMethods.io is already under IBM, I think IBM will introduce and integrate AI into it. Additionally, regarding what webMethods.io can improve is the license cost. Other cloud players are also providing the same kind of functionality, such as AWS and Azure. webMethods.io is being installed on-premises, but AWS is providing it directly in the cloud. When comparing the license cost and request per minute cost, webMethods.io needs to address that. There are many competitors in the market for this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The data is stored in the cloud, making it easy to download data simultaneously into multiple smaller servers, effectively downsizing the process."

"Oracle Data Integrator helps us build tables and data marts and allows us to schedule them daily, for nearly real-time data warehousing."

"Having a single vendor supporting the entire suite of applications."

"Oracle integration cloud has got the adapters for all their products, which makes integration faster."

"The solution is easy to manage and offers good integration. You can run all the tasks one by one which is really helpful, and pick the day and time to do so."

"The most valuable thing to me is its simplicity. A person with zero knowledge can also develop the integration without having extensive technology knowledgebase. They can also work on creating their own integration."

"It's on the cloud, so it's scalable and quite easy to work with."

"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."

"We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces."

"They are the building blocks of EAI in SAG products, and they offer a very good platform."

"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."

"Application integration, business process integration, and B2B partner integration are valuable. But among these, I feel B2B partner integration is the most valuable. This module integrates two business partners and exchanges data through electronic data interchange messages in the form of specific standards, without any manual process needed."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution."

"I like the solution's policies, transformation, mediation, and routing features."

"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Bulk uploading can be a problem when you hit the upper limit."

"The pricing could be more competitive."

"This is an expensive solution compared to other products on the market."

"I would like to see different cloud adapters or connectors in case of integration. When you have Oracle to Oracle, they are good. They have really good connectors, but if it is a different ERP, like Obsidian, that is where they are faced with problems in OIC."

"I've found technical support not very effective. They should work to improve their services."

"It can be made much easier for users. They should be allowed to easily monitor the data extraction and flow, allowing them to observe real-time data flow within the software, making the process straightforward."

"It's lacking a lot of mapping features that Oracle OSB and SOA have. It needs to evolve a lot."

"It is an expensive solution and not very suitable for smaller businesses."

"The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so."

"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."

"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."

"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"For code version control, you need to use some external software."

"As webMethods Integration Server is expensive, that's its area for improvement."

"The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is competitive compared to Boomi which is much higher."

"I am not involved in the licensing side of things."

"Sometimes we don't have a very clear idea what the licensing will entail at first, because it can be very customizable. On one hand, this can be a good thing, because it can be tailored to a specific customer's needs. But on the other hand it can also be an issue when some customer asks, "What's the cost?" and we can't yet give them an accurate answer."

"The solution’s pricing is too high."

"With our current licensing, it's very easy for us to scale. With our older licensing model, it was very hard. This is definitely something that I would highlight."

"This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

"I would like to see better pricing for the license."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a bit costly compared to others solutions."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service

Compared 52% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service

Compared 19% of the time

Jitterbit Harmony vs Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate Cloud Service vs Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service

Compared 14% of the time

More Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service

January 2026

Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

January 2026

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service provides pushdown data processing; high performance ETL with less data movement which is best for the Cloud. Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service executes data transformations where the data lies without having to copy data unnecessarily to remote locations.

Oracle

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Amplifon

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service vs. webMethods.io

December 2025

Free Report: Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Data Integrator Cloud Service vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.