Opsview vs Stackify comparison

ITRS and Stackify are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. ITRS is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0, while Stackify is ranked #68. ITRS holds a 1.2% mindshare in IM, compared to Stackify’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Stackify users who would recommend it.

Opsview

Read 25 Opsview reviews

5,615 Views
3,369 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Stackify

Read 6 Stackify reviews

3,563 Views
1,496 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Opsview

Stackify

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Opsview and Stackify are competing in the IT infrastructure monitoring solution category. Opsview seems to have the upper hand in enterprise environments due to its comprehensive features and scalability, while Stackify is preferred by development teams for its integrated application performance management and developer-friendly tools.

Features: Opsview provides extensive monitoring capabilities, includes support for a variety of platforms, and is recognized for its scalability. Stackify is strong in application performance tracking, offers robust logging functionalities, and real-time alerts which are valuable for DevOps teams.

Room for Improvement: Opsview could benefit from enhancements in user interface design, additional third-party integrations, and more straightforward onboarding processes. Stackify may improve by expanding its feature set for infrastructure monitoring, offering better scalability for larger enterprises, and providing more customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Opsview is known for robust on-premise deployment options and effective cloud integration, suiting complex environments. It provides tailored solutions but can be challenging to set up. Stackify offers a seamless deployment experience with its cloud-based solution, emphasizing ease of integration and providing continuous updates that make it more agile.

Pricing and ROI: Opsview's initial costs reflect its enterprise focus and customizable features, which may result in a higher upfront investment but aim for substantial ROI. Stackify offers flexible pricing models allowing for a cost-effective entry point, making it attractive for smaller teams and development-centric environments with quicker returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Opsview vs. Stackify Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Opsview vs. Stackify

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,948 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Opsview

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

33rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (44th), Server Monitoring (21st), Cloud Monitoring Software (24th)

Stackify

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

68th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (62nd), Log Management (58th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Opsview is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stackify is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Opsview	1.2%
Stackify	0.7%
Other	98.1%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

reviewer1898607

Partner Technical Support & Escalation Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Real-time dashboards have improved our deployment monitoring and incident response

We are using Opsview ourselves, rather than being a consultant or a reseller. We do not use its auto-discovery feature. We do not utilize its API driven architecture. I do not know what metrics we use to assess the effectiveness of Opsview's hybrid IT monitoring. Overall, I am pretty satisfied with Opsview as it is good for what it does. I do not know if Grafana has any other advantages besides better stats, as I am not involved in that side. Based on my experience, I would still recommend Opsview to others as it is good for what it does. I gave this review a rating of 8.

Read full review

Idoko Emmanuel

Senior Software Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has good filtering and rating features and helps with resource and load management

I've not used Stackify for a while, and I'm currently using a solution now that's not as good as Stackify. Among the solutions I've been using so far, Stackify has been one of the best for me, but there's always room for improvement. For example, I don't know if it's just me, but when I try to get the log from Stackify, sometimes it doesn't appear in real-time. It takes a few minutes before the logs appear. When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs. I don't know if other customers have a similar experience. It's the wait time for the logs to appear that's a concern for me, could be improved, and is what the Stackify team should be looking into. In terms of any additional feature that I'd like added to the solution, I'm not sure if Stackify has a way to export logs out. I've been trying to do it. On the solution, you can click on a spiral-like icon and it shows you the entire error, and I'd prefer an export button that would let me download the error and save that into a text file, for example, so it'll be available on my local machine for me to reference it, especially because the log keeps going and as you're using the solution, the system keeps pushing messages on to Stackify, so if I'm looking at a particular error at 12:05 PM, for example, by the time I go back to my system and would like to revisit the error at 12:25 PM, on Stackify, the logs would have gone past that level and I won't see it again which makes it difficult. When you now go back to that timestamp, you don't tend to see it immediately, but if the solution had an export feature for me to save that particular error information on my local machine for reference at a later time, I won't have to go back to Stackify. I just go to that log, specifically to that particular export that I've received on my local machine. I can get it and review it, and it would be easier that way versus me going back to Stackify to find that particular error and request that particular information.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a good solution. It covers all aspects of monitoring purposes."

"I am satisfied with the overall product since it works well…It is a stable solution."

"What was very compelling about OpsView was that we could dial out the noise and have meaningful and actionable alerts."

"With the monitoring capabilities, I can tell when things happen and be proactive about them instead of constantly putting out fires."

"We use this solution for internal monitoring our own cloud platform because we are a public cloud provider, and we also use it for monitoring purposes on behalf of our clients."

"Very easy-to-use interface, especially starting from v5 onwards Advanced tweaking possibilities Netflow"

"The fully-extensible event handling has enabled us to reduce on-call incidents by more than 90%."

"As a busy sysadmin that wears many hats, it is a relief to deal with this product and the Opsview staff."

More Opsview pros

"Within few hours of install we've identify the source of issue we've been investigating for few days and couldn't pin point."

"We switched from New Relic and Loggly as it provides us more info at a lower price."

"The deployment is very fast."

"What stood out to us were the metrics and granular details we received."

"The performance dashboard and the accurate level of details are beneficial."

"It is very simple and very easy to configure."

"The filter feature on Stackify is one of the features I found valuable. It's awesome. When I want to get the application logs, the solution gives me many filters. For example, if I want to get logs from my test environment, the option is there for me to select the environment from Stackify, and you can also select the particular application, and you'll see the information you need there. The filter feature alone and the fact that Stackify offers a lot of different filters is what I like the most about the solution because I've used other tools with the filter feature, but the filtering was very difficult, versus Stackify that has good filtering. On Stackify, you can filter the information by the last one hour, or the last four hours, and you can also select the date range and specify the timestamp, then the solution will give you the information based on the date range you specified. Another feature I found valuable on Stackify is its rating feature because it tells you how your application is faring. For example, a rating of A means excellent, while a rating of F means very bad, or that your application is not doing well at all. The ratings are from A to F. I also like that Stackify helps you in terms of load management because the solution gives you information on overutilized resources. These are the most valuable features of the solution."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

More Stackify pros

Cons

"Customized reporting can be improved."

"We're already evaluating v5.0 and to tell the truth, there's a couple of things that we found really useful in previous versions that for some reason they have removed."

"Reload time: Although there have been major gains in the time to process reloads, I think that there is still room for improvement in this area."

"Often the webpage becomes inaccessible and you need to refresh the page."

"Some of the graphics on Opsview could be improved."

"Sometimes Opsview has crashed, but the multiple master/slave solution provides consistent uptime for monitoring."

"Some aspects of the GUI functionality need improvement."

"Large Opsview setups come with high licensing fees."

More Opsview cons

"Another improvement would be the agent memory utilization, which led to our recent reevaluation."

"Better mobile support."

"The search feature could be improved."

"When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs."

"I'm looking to see more performance tools, but heard that they are going to release some."

"It should be easily scalable and configurable in different instances."

"I've not used Stackify for a while, and I'm currently using a solution now that's not as good as Stackify. Among the solutions I've been using so far, Stackify has been one of the best for me, but there's always room for improvement. For example, I don't know if it's just me, but when I try to get the log from Stackify, sometimes it doesn't appear in real-time. It takes a few minutes before the logs appear. When I redeploy my solution and the application starts, I don't see the logs immediately, and it would take two to three minutes before I see the logs. I don't know if other customers have a similar experience. It's the wait time for the logs to appear that's a concern for me, could be improved, and is what the Stackify team should be looking into. In terms of any additional feature that I'd like added to the solution, I'm not sure if Stackify has a way to export logs out. I've been trying to do it. On the solution, you can click on a spiral-like icon and it shows you the entire error, and I'd prefer an export button that would let me download the error and save that into a text file, for example, so it'll be available on my local machine for me to reference it, especially because the log keeps going and as you're using the solution, the system keeps pushing messages on to Stackify, so if I'm looking at a particular error at 12:05 PM, for example, by the time I go back to my system and would like to revisit the error at 12:25 PM, on Stackify, the logs would have gone past that level and I won't see it again which makes it difficult. When you now go back to that timestamp, you don't tend to see it immediately, but if the solution had an export feature for me to save that particular error information on my local machine for reference at a later time, I won't have to go back to Stackify. I just go to that log, specifically to that particular export that I've received on my local machine. I can get it and review it, and it would be easier that way versus me going back to Stackify to find that particular error and request that particular information."

"It's not easy to set up. It's hard especially for juniors to understand."

More Stackify cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is priced similarly to other tools offering similar features."

"The solution is not cheap. I think that the pricing is a little bit on the high side."

"I would rate pricing a seven out of ten, where ten is the highest price."

"The price is variable. It depends on how much data we have received in that particular month. Usually, it goes up to $2,000, or, at times, $3,000 USD per month."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

21%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Outsourcing Company

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Opsview Monitor?

There is always room for improvement, and part of the reason we're looking at Grafana is because there are things it can do that Opsview cannot do as well. Grafana does have features that I think m...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Opsview Monitor?

Our primary use case is monitoring our deployments.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Opsview Monitor?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Nagios XI vs Opsview

Compared 10% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Opsview

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Opsview

Compared 6% of the time

More Opsview Competitors

New Relic vs Stackify

Compared 8% of the time

Dynatrace vs Stackify

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs Stackify

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Stackify

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs Stackify

Compared 5% of the time

More Stackify Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Opsview

August 2026

Download Opsview product report

Buyer's Guide

Stackify

July 2026

Download Stackify product report

Also Known As

Opsview Monitor, Opsview Enterprise

No data available

Overview

Opsview provides advanced monitoring for system availability, service metrics, and resource usage with flexibility and scalability tailored for global networks.

Opsview delivers comprehensive monitoring through its flexible alert framework, web GUI, and integration with Nagios plugins. It facilitates seamless server additions, supports multi-tenancy, and offers scalability with a MySQL backend. Configuring new hosts and services is straightforward, while advanced services like cloning and alert noise reduction enhance user experience. Users mention room for improvement in the API, database support, and features like bulk changes in the GUI. Despite these aspects, Opsview is preferred for cloud and client monitoring across multiple geographical points.

What are Opsview's most important features?

Flexible Alert Framework: Allows customized alerting rules to suit diverse needs.
Web GUI and Dashboard: Intuitive interfaces for real-time monitoring and data visualization.
Integration with Nagios: Compatible with a wide range of plugins for extended functionality.
Multi-Tenancy: Supports multiple users with isolated data views.
API and Automation: Streamlines management and operational workflows.
Distributed Monitoring: Ensures reliable performance across global networks.

What benefits or ROI are users experiencing?

Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructure with ease.
Ease of Configuration: Simplifying initial setup and ongoing adjustments.
Accurate Alerting: Reduces false positives, improving response efficiency.
System Stability: Consistent performance with minimal downtime.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive integration and customization options.

Opsview proves valuable in cloud environments for monitoring resource availability and performance. Organizations deploy it for both internal and client-facing monitoring across global regions, benefiting from enhanced event triggers and automation opportunities, particularly in deployment monitoring and service tracking.

ITRS

Stackify enhances application performance monitoring with features like detailed logging and effective filtering options, integrating capabilities to eliminate the need for multiple tools, and providing rapid deployment and stable performance.

Stackify offers a comprehensive solution for business insight through custom dashboards, error monitoring, load management, and application scoring. Its ability to visualize performance by creating responsive dashboards helps connect business and technical teams. Despite its strengths, users seek improvements such as better mobile support, real-time log appearance, and Docker documentation. Enhanced Linux support and agent memory optimization are also desired, along with better visibility into container and application performance metrics. Integrating more plugins and options would make Stackify a more robust monitoring tool.

What are the key features of Stackify?

Detailed Log and Error Data: Provides in-depth traces and logs for error and data analysis.
Custom Dashboards: Offers business insights and application scoring through tailored dashboards.
Performance Metrics: Monitors application and server performance effectively.
Simple Configuration: Ensures easier setup and deployment without complexities.
Filtering Options: Enables effective management of logs and errors through filters.

What benefits should be expected from using Stackify?

Improved Performance Monitoring: Provides tools to identify root causes and enhance application and server monitoring.
Resource Management: Manages server utilization and handles resource spikes efficiently.
Proactive Alerts: Allows setting up alerts across platforms like AWS and Docker.
Log Aggregation: Compiles logs for testing and analysis to improve system performance.

Organizations across industries use Stackify for extensive application performance monitoring, particularly in testing environments. It is crucial for analyzing database calls, third-party requests, and aggregating logs. Its capabilities in monitoring across AWS and Docker environments make it especially valuable for dynamic and distributed infrastructures.

Stackify

Sample Customers

IBM, BT, Cisco, Sky, UPS, Capgemini, Visolit, Fujitsu Services UK, UKCloud, Massachusetts Insitute of Technology, Cornell University, Incomm

MyRacePass, ClearSale, Newitts, Carbonite, Boston Software, Children's International, Starkwood Media Group, Fewzion

Buyer's Guide

Opsview vs. Stackify

August 2026

Free Report: Opsview vs. Stackify

Find out what your peers are saying about Opsview vs. Stackify and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Opsview vs. Stackify report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.