No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

OpenVINO vs UiPath AI Center comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenVINO
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
14th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath AI Center
Ranking in AI Development Platforms
23rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
4.9
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Mahender Reddy Pokala - PeerSpot reviewer
AI Developer at University of Chicago
Improved model deployment on edge devices, but compatibility and scalability present challenges
I found OpenVINO's ability to convert custom models into its format particularly beneficial, as businesses sometimes require unique models specific to their use cases. Utilizing OpenVINO allowed me to run these custom models on devices directly, which I found quite impressive. Additionally, the Model Zoo offered by OpenVINO added value to the product.
reviewer2894310 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Consultant at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees
Automated invoice workflows have transformed our document processing and reduced manual effort
UiPath AI Center offers several great features, including the ability to create datasets manually and automate the pipeline for retraining ML models. I can easily set a default timing or create a recurring pipeline to train the documents from Action Center, which provides me with a variety of features, with the easy user interface being one of the best aspects.The recurring pipeline scheduling has saved me a lot of time because I usually have to manually train and mark documents, but when users utilize my bot, they contribute to the data, marking approximately 50% of invoice extraction fields from Action Center. This allows the existing marked data to be automatically retrained, significantly saving me time as a developer and improving the training efficiency since multiple users are validating the invoices, generating a lot of data for training. UiPath AI Center has positively impacted my organization, particularly in automating the invoice extraction process, leading to significant cost savings and time reduction. Manually reading and posting invoices in SAP involves considerable time and effort, but by automating invoice extraction and posting, we now only require users to flag low-confidence fields, allowing for major cycle time reduction and cost savings in invoice processing. I estimate a 50 to 70% reduction in cycle time and roughly a 60% reduction in the required manual effort. Some humans still need to validate the extracted data, so it may be around 60 to 75%.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The inferencing and processing capabilities are quite beneficial for our requirements."
"Intel's support team is very good."
"The features for model comparison, the feature for model testing, evaluation, and deployment are very nice, and it can work almost with all the models."
"The solution's ability to stream data directly from camera inputs is the most valuable aspect for us."
"The runtime of OpenVINO is highly valuable for running different computer vision models."
"One positive aspect about OpenVINO is that it supports more frameworks than the Google Coral TPU."
"The initial setup is quite simple."
"Compared to Jetson Nano or Jetson TX2, or Jetson Xavier, OpenVINO is a much more cost-effective solution."
"UiPath AI Center is found to be very valuable because it has improved significantly in extracting information from each invoice."
"UiPath AI Center has positively impacted my organization, particularly in automating the invoice extraction process, leading to significant cost savings and time reduction."
 

Cons

"The model optimization is a little bit slow — it could be improved."
"Scalability is a challenge with OpenVINO, particularly when I try to connect multiple streams of input or run multiple edge devices consecutively."
"At this point, the product could probably just use a greater integration with more machine learning model tools."
"It has some disadvantages because when you're working with very complex models, neural networks, if OpenVINO cannot convert them automatically and you have to do a custom layer and later add it to the model, it is difficult."
"It would be great if OpenVINO could convert new models into its format more quickly."
"I think that it's not properly designed for scalability. It's designed for other purposes, specifically to be able to use Intel hardware and run inference using generative models or deep learning models in Intel hardware."
"I couldn't get it to run on my Raspberry Pi 4 because the software packages to download were no longer available."
"One improvement I would like to see in UiPath AI Center is the addition of more ML models."
"To improve UiPath AI Center, clients need to be convinced to purchase a separate Document Understanding license because it is quite costly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We didn't have to pay for any licensing with Intel OpenVINO. Everything is available on their site and easily downloadable for free."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with OpenVINO?
I have heard good things about OpenVINO. It doesn't consume much current for external GPU usage. However, it has some downsides because I couldn't get it to run on my Raspberry Pi 4. While not spec...
What is your primary use case for OpenVINO?
I wanted to use OpenVINO for my Raspberry Pi to analyze my sleep with a night vision camera and to improve GPU performance on my Raspberry Pi. I would have used OpenVINO's Model Optimizer feature t...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath AI Center?
The pricing for UiPath AI Center is generally acceptable. If pricing could be broken down into simpler parts, such as offering a trial on extracting a specific number of invoices, it would help cli...
What needs improvement with UiPath AI Center?
One improvement I would like to see in UiPath AI Center is the addition of more ML models. Although it currently offers a variety, integrating with Hugging Face to access and deploy their models in...
What is your primary use case for UiPath AI Center?
The major use case I built using UiPath AI Center was for automated invoice extraction, where I created an ML model that extracts all the required fields from invoices. This helped me automate the ...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVINO vs. UiPath AI Center and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.