OpenText Functional Testing and ZAPTEST are competing products in the software testing tools category. OpenText has the upper hand in pricing and integration, while ZAPTEST is favored for its advanced features and user satisfaction.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing offers substantial integration capabilities, comprehensive test coverage, and seamless tech environment adaptation. ZAPTEST provides automated testing across platforms, streamlined scripting processes, and feature-rich versatility for modernization.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its feature set and agility, refine its scripting, and expand platform adaptability. ZAPTEST should focus on lowering initial costs, improving comprehensive support, and expanding integration capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText supports a straightforward deployment model with extensive support, easing team transitions. ZAPTEST offers flexible cloud-based deployment, appealing for adaptability, and is noted for its agile and responsive customer service.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText is recognized for competitive pricing, offering a favorable ROI over time. ZAPTEST, though commanding a higher initial cost, is perceived as yielding a higher ROI due to its robust features.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
