OmniPeek vs Statseeker comparison

BlueCat and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. BlueCat is ranked #74, while Techniche is ranked #60 with an average rating of 7.0. BlueCat holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BlueCat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

OmniPeek

Read 7 OmniPeek reviews

964 Views
370 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

416 Views
252 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

OmniPeek

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

OmniPeek and Statseeker are competing network monitoring tools. Statseeker appears superior due to its comprehensive features despite OmniPeek's lower pricing and intuitive deployment.

Features: OmniPeek focuses on packet analysis, real-time network troubleshooting, and data flow insights essential for network engineers. Statseeker provides detailed network performance monitoring, expansive device support, and centralized network visibility, appealing to IT departments.

Room for Improvement: OmniPeek may improve by expanding its device support, providing more detailed network performance metrics, and enhancing centralized network visibility. Statseeker could benefit from optimizing its initial setup process, reducing the need for extensive training, and potentially lowering its initial cost.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OmniPeek offers straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, ideal for quick implementation. Statseeker has a robust deployment model with extensive support services, though it may require more initial setup and training.

Pricing and ROI: OmniPeek has a lower setup cost, making it valuable for organizations with tighter budgets. Statseeker, while more expensive initially, provides a higher return on investment through enhanced features and capabilities over time, aligning well for businesses focusing on long-term network efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed OmniPeek vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OmniPeek vs. Statseeker

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OmniPeek

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

74th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (65th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

60th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of OmniPeek is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Kunwar Preet Singh Sodhi

Test lead at Wipro Limited

User-friendly, stable, and scalable

The solution's automation has room for improvement. I have observed that Wireshark is much more commonly used for automation than OmniPeek. This is because when scripts are involved, Wireshark provides a great deal of flexibility for automating the process of packet sniffing. In the case of OmniPeek, its capabilities are limited, which restricts its automation potential. However, it is already user-friendly and compatible with Microsoft, so if it were to become comparable to Wireshark, it could potentially dominate the market. I have seen many new versions of OmniPeek, but I have never seen an automation version. The price of OmniPeek can be improved. Many customers have chosen the solution due to its user-friendly nature, but the cost often prevents them from making a purchase. This means that they may opt for an open-source tool instead. We should look into making the pricing more competitive and consider offering customization options to increase its utility in automation. This could be a game-changer.

Read full review

Jessie Hackney

Network Engineer at West Virginia Department of Education

Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise

The product has improved our organization by simplifying monitoring and giving real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise. If we notice five devices with latency or errors, I wouldn't know that if I didn't command line into 800 devices and check every day. I can see the status on the dashboard and it just makes it easy to know where the problems are. If we didn't have that capability by using Statseeker, then it would be very complex to monitor. We'd need to have another tool or manually log into every device to try to check things. And this product just does it all for us. That streamlines and improves our workload so that we only need to have two people in our office for the network team. It improves availability. If a circuit goes down texts and email alerts get sent out. So, even if it's in the evening or we're not on premises, we'll know if something's down. We use it all the time because it really helps.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I believe the most crucial feature of OmniPeek search is the ability to sniff packets based on channel switching."

"The most valuable feature of OmniPeek was the ability it gave us to see the connection procedure."

"The most valuable feature of OmniPeek is the ability to assign custom color codes to the different packets easily."

"It's a solid piece of software. It's stable."

"The most valuable feature is OmniPeek is user-friendly."

"The most valuable features are the voice bot, which checks the quality of service for voice, and the expert view that gives me insight on what and where to troubleshoot."

"OmniPeek's ability to convert application visibility into flow helps me quickly understand application performance over LAN, WAN, or wireless."

"This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it."

"Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is."

"Key features for us are custom reporting, 95th Percentile, and trend lines."

"The most valuable feature is the dashboard, where you have everything right there on the screen."

"We were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."

"This solution allowed us to track down trouble users."

"If somebody is complaining about slow networking then this solution allows us to see various ports to find out whether they are being overloaded."

"Whether it is a down network switch or a down router, we can get back online faster for the customers."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"I would like to see the saving feature improved. We have had issues if you do not save your progress then you have to start from the beginning."

"Making it more clear on how to configure the filters, or really automating them, would be an improvement."

"I would like to see the tool work in an open environment the same as how it does in a closed environment."

"I don't see a clear roadmap in the future for improving this software."

"I am not using OmniPeek for automation, we only do manual testing. Automation testing is tedious to do. The automation should be more user-friendly. I have exposed some APIs but the usage is not user-friendly."

"The solution's automation has room for improvement."

"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."

"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."

"Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards."

"This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."

"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."

"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."

"The interface could be more user-friendly and it would be nice if there were enhanced options for reporting."

"We haven't seen an ROI."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have only purchased the add-on once and have not paid for any subsequent versions as it was too costly for us."

"There are different types of licenses available."

"The pricing for this solution could be improved, as it is a very expensive product."

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."

"We pay somewhere between $5,000 and $8,000 yearly in licensing fees."

"The yearly cost varies as per the number of devices being monitored. The cost for 25,000 devices is about $4500."

"It's probably $5K a year for the license."

"We pay a yearly maintenance fee of approximately $40,000 USD."

"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Educational Organization

10%

Comms Service Provider

University

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

University

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs OmniPeek

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs OmniPeek

Compared 20% of the time

ThousandEyes vs OmniPeek

Compared 20% of the time

Colasoft Capsa vs OmniPeek

Compared 17% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs OmniPeek

Compared 12% of the time

More OmniPeek Competitors

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 54% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 46% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

April 2025

Download OmniPeek product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

April 2025

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

Savvius OmniPeek

No data available

Overview

Omnipeek is a top-rated suite of network analytics software that offers full transparency and trusted forensics for immediate resolution of application and network performance anomalies and security issues. Omnipeek is part of the LiveAction family of quality trusted products. They specialize in packet intelligence with adaptable workflows and complete visibility throughout numerous network segments to facilitate a better understanding of network performance and dependability concerns in real time.

Omnipeek combines intuitive geolocation, usability, security, and performance to deliver a robust user experience that facilitates immediate discovery and problem-solving of wireless and wired networks.

Omnipeek is user friendly and offers many different intuitive dashboards, display options, graphs, peer maps, and packets. There are several different capture options, such as TCP dump, multiple adapters, local captures, and Capture Assistant. Omnipeek integrates well with Snort and Suricata intrusion and detection prevention solutions, allowing users to import events easily. The comprehensive analysis tools, such as Expert Flow Analysis, Web Traffic Analysis, Multi-Segment Analysis, and Local File Analysis combine to make Omnipeek a solid, complete solution.

Omnipeek is effective for small offices to large enterprise data centers.

Omnipeek Benefits

Omnipeek delivers unmatched transparency into applications, networks, and classification of layer 7 workflows.
Intuitive GUI presents a clear, intuitive view of packet-based analytics by conversation pairs.
Ability to capture and dissect 802.11n and 802.11ac wireless traffic from currently deployed points from third-party vendors such as Aruba, Cisco, and others.
Investigate traffic from all remote network segments, such as voice and video over IP, 802.11,1/10/40/100 Gigabit, Ethernet using the LiveCapture features and appliances.
Audit voice and video over IP traffic in real time using call back play, thorough signaling and media analyses, and high-level multi-media summary statistics.
Improve the average time to resolve failure with super fast intuition and interconnection with packet data, metadata, flows, and files.

Omnipeek Features

WiFi monitoring: Using Omnipeek LiveCapture 1100, users are able to thoroughly monitor wired packet traffic and gather wireless traffic from WLAN controllers. Users can easily monitor, dissect, log, and diagnose multi-Gigabit speed 802.11ac traffic.
Improved LiveAction appliance support: LiveAction update appliances and software uses the innovative Del architectures and Intel capabilities to improve network packet capture-to-disk to 20Gbps in a 2RU system, with up to 128 TB of storage.
Improved VOIP processes: Now offering updates to performance and in synthesizing DTMF audio tones, Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP), and Asserted Identity (caller ID), makes Omnipeek a very robust, complete solution.
Improved financial transaction support: The solution provides updated support for ISO8583 protocol necessary for financial and banking organizations. Users have the ability to dissect critical data more thoroughly than with previous iterations.
Expert improvements: Users have access to several more Expert events, enhanced latency calculations, and many other improvements to the Expert views in Omnipeek.
3rd party authentication improvements: Efficient workflow for 3rd party authentication results in enhanced performance for Access Control Lists (ACL).

BlueCat

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Apcon, Aruba Networks, Avaya Inc., Cisco Systems, Ekahau, Gigamon Systems, HP, IBM, IXIA, Meru Networks, Napatech, NextComputing, Procera Networks, Qualcomm Atheros, Ralink Technology Corporation, Telchemy

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

OmniPeek vs. Statseeker

April 2025

Free Report: OmniPeek vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about OmniPeek vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OmniPeek vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.