No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Nimesa Backup and Recovery for AWS vs Precisely Assure QuickEDD comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nimesa Backup and Recovery ...
Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
24th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (45th)
Precisely Assure QuickEDD
Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
31st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of Nimesa Backup and Recovery for AWS is 0.3%. The mindshare of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nimesa Backup and Recovery for AWS0.3%
Precisely Assure QuickEDD1.6%
Other98.1%
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software
 

Featured Reviews

Sumanth Chowdary - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Technical Consultant
Centralized automation has improved cloud backups and strengthens disaster recovery readiness
One area where Nimesa Backup and Recovery for AWS could improve is expanding advanced analytics and predictive monitoring capabilities, especially for identifying backup risks, storage optimization opportunities, and recovery readiness trends more proactively. The platform could also benefit from deeper automation around recovery orchestration and policy-based remediation workflows for large-scale enterprise environments. Another improvement area is more granular customization in reporting and dashboard views to support different operational and compliance requirements. I also think broader integrations with security monitoring, ITSM, and DevSecOps ecosystems would further enhance operational visibility and workflow efficiency. Overall, the core backup and recovery capabilities are strong, but continued enhancements around automation, analytics, and ecosystem integration would make the platform even more effective. In my day-to-day operation, I have found that in larger or more complex AWS environments, deeper filtering and more granular reporting customization would be helpful for operational teams managing multiple workloads and accounts. More advanced automation for recovery orchestration and proactive alerting around backup anomalies would also improve efficiency further. Expanding predictive insights around storage growth, backup optimization, and recovery readiness would add a lot of value for long-term cloud resilience planning. Overall, the platform works effectively operationally, but these enhancements would make large-scale management even smoother and more proactive.
reviewer2325741 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Information Technology at a construction company with 1-10 employees
Trustworthy and provides good availability
Our administrator found the solution easy to use, but once that administrator left, it felt very overwhelming to the individual who took it over. It could be more of a knowledge transfer situation that didn't happen, but we didn't know if it was easy to use. Precisely Assure QuickEDD is deployed on the cloud in our organization. The implementation of QLED helped us with our recovery time objective and was a seamless transition. In order to utilize the product to its fullest potential, users should be knowledgeable of what it offers. They should also form a relationship with the person who is their representative. Overall, I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Overall, these features make day-to-day backup operations more structured, reduce operational overhead, and improve confidence around recovery preparedness and cloud resilience."
"Nimesa Backup and Recovery for AWS helped us automate backup scheduling and policy management, gave us centralized visibility with a dashboard across AWS workloads of multiple accounts, helped us with a faster recovery process, and majorly reduced our operational overhead while improving our ransomware and data protection."
"Previously, if we had any disaster or any issue, it would take days to bring the environment back up to the original state, and with Nimesa Backup and Recovery for AWS, we can do that within a couple of hours, which greatly reduces downtime in the case of disaster recovery."
"Synchronous applications are valuable."
"Its initial setup is fine; it is straightforward and easy."
"The most valuable feature of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is the backup system."
 

Cons

"Regarding customer support, as this is a very new product and relatively new in the market, I am not sure how long they have been around, but there seems to be a lack of understanding with the support team."
"One area where Nimesa Backup and Recovery for AWS could improve is expanding advanced analytics and predictive monitoring capabilities, especially for identifying backup risks, storage optimization opportunities, and recovery readiness trends more proactively."
"Nimesa Backup and Recovery for AWS has a fairly small market presence."
"It is expensive. The cost varies based on your requirements."
"Our administrator found the solution easy to use, but once that administrator left, it felt very overwhelming to the individual who took it over."
"There should be more interactive dashboards."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is expensive. The cost varies based on your requirements. If you want to manage it, there is an extra cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.
900,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
53%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Nimesa Backup and Recovery for AWS?
One area where Nimesa Backup and Recovery for AWS could improve is expanding advanced analytics and predictive monitoring capabilities, especially for identifying backup risks, storage optimization...
What is your primary use case for Nimesa Backup and Recovery for AWS?
The main use case has been improving backup automation, disaster recovery readiness, and centralized protection for AWS-hosted workloads. I mainly use Nimesa Backup and Recovery for AWS to protect ...
What advice do you have for others considering Nimesa Backup and Recovery for AWS?
One piece of advice that I would give is to clearly define specific backup, recovery, and disaster recovery objectives before implementation so that backup policies and retention strategies align p...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Syncsort Assure QuickEDD, Syncsort Quick-EDD/HA, Quick-EDD/HA
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Toyota Material Handling Australia, Westpac Pacific Banking, Symphony Health, Wimbledon, OCBC Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Veeam Software, Broadcom and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Updated: May 2026.
900,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.